Selenial
I Choose Violence
Originally posted by DarthAnt66
Granted China's not including in the polling, but unless you want to argue they'd be considered #1, that's irrelevant.SO MANY Ls.
Not to mention unless you provide a margin of error for your poll, it doesn't fall under, since we're using the 2015 stats which was 54.
But I thought you could do math?
And if your margin of error does fall under, it's still blatant you're taking the highest of your poll and the lowest of mine to make it work.
If you keep taking Ls, the Donald might not have any left to give to his enemies.
Did you seriously just pick a poll that China isn't even included in? And no, that's not how polling works, lmfao. Every polling company uses different terminology, has different requirements for allowing people to be polled etc.
You cannot say there is a 3% discrepancy between two different polling agencies potentially asking a different question and act as if one is invalidated as a result. Do you have legitimately no idea how this works, or what? One poll isn't more valid than another, that's precisely why so many different polling agencies cover U.S. Elections, it's so insanely easy to skew a poll one way or the other. Therefore, using a poll that China doesn't register on, and looking at the US's numbers (which are not drastically different) in an attempt to invalidate a poll that proves your point incorrect, is ridiculously fallacious.
You keep acting as if you're winning this sweetie, you're really not. Not to mention you're arguing against a strawman.
Here's a list of things I want you to address:
[list][*]Quote me anywhere I said comparing the patriotism of China and the US was worthwhile
[*]Address the previous posts on China's status as an economic powerhouse
[*]Admit defeat on the discussion centered around the military, since you're apparently refusing to reply to it
[*]Concede in general, you're wasting my time ✅
[/list]
Thanks babycakes 🙂