also, when you're going to argue that you don't believe in god because he does horrible things, don't turn around and ad hominem the opposition to death because "they're idiot's for believing at all."
I thought we assumed, for argument's sake, that he is real.
Originally posted by Autokrat
[b]Translation: I am unable to think for myself and require an imaginary superbeing to provide for my basis of morality. Even when this imaginary superbeing reportedly does horrible things, it must be good since he "works in mysterious ways" and it would be too difficult to think for myself and maybe realize that believing in a primitive book written by primitive men just might be a stupid idea. I fully admit that I cannot prove that this superbeing exists and that I have no logical basis for anything I believe; however, I still expect the atheist to quit being an arrogant fool and realize that my beliefs are right because only an arrogant fool would challenge the rules of the superbeing that I worship even though I cannot prove that he exists and have no empirical reason for doing so. [/B]
see this? This is just juveneile.
Originally posted by One Free Man
also, when you're going to argue that you don't believe in god because he does horrible things, don't turn around and ad hominem the opposition to death because "they're idiot's for believing at all."I thought we assumed, for argument's sake, that he is real.
see this? This is just juveneile.
This is what you get when you try and debate ignorant, insecure children who just want people to acknowledge their intelligence. No objectivity, just a bunch of crying. It's hilarious, really.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XXJY3vjxz70
Absolutely priceless.