The Battle Bar, Our Wretched Hive of Scum and Villainy

Started by Dr McBeefington3,287 pages

Originally posted by AthenasTrgrFngr
[B]yeah i was wrong about the statistics. apparently things have gotten worse since i last looked at them.

not ten times. to paraphrase, "men are not "12 times as likely as women to perpetrate child abuse" but some multiplier significantly greater even than that. In other words:

Children are at astronomically greater risk of physical abuse in the care of a man than in the care of a woman."

and also not 90%.

Of the almost 3.5 million violent crimes committed against family members, 49% of these were crimes against spouses.
84% of spouse abuse victims were females, and 86% of victims of dating partner abuse were female.
Males were 83% of spouse murderers and 75% of dating partner murderers
87% of stalkers are men.

if you cant see how thats relevant to bias in child custody cases then youre beyond help.


You're wasting my time with your stupidity. You just equated criminal cases with civil divorce proceedings. You lose.

oh i see youre doing what you did earlier by further specifying to dodge my points and affirm your opinion. it started off with talking about bias in favor of women in courts in general, then after i smashed that you narrowed it down to just men vs. women in court cases, and now that ive smashed that you want to narrow it down futher and pretend that you were only referring to the asset distribution after divorce. let me guess, you were never talking about custody battles in the first place amirite!?!?

Oh right, by posting irrelevant data and then making an incorrect comparison, you've smashed something. I love the delusions of the unintelligent.

Your argument is weak, your comparisons are weak, perhaps you should just stop posting. When you can show me how specific abuse crimes against the spouse factor in to those specific divorce proceedings, I'll be inclined to listen. Meanwhile stop embarrassing yourself..


The only reason boys today eschew atheltics and fun is because theya have been consistently raised by women, who are week and start teaching crap like crying is okay being storng on the inside is wqhat counts.

the america of the 40s was built on manliness, this america is built on libtarded gayness and neo-feminism.

And it shows.

Eat paint and retard yourself dead Wow. You suck.

Also, Men are mostly scum.

Edit: I also find it ironic that the 'we need to get back to being manly men!' bullshit is coming from 2 guys who frequent a Star Wars debating forum. Wow, butch.


You're wasting my time with your stupidity. You just equated criminal cases with civil divorce proceedings. You lose.
if you cant see how thats relevant to bias in child custody cases then youre beyond help.

Originally posted by Nephthys
Eat paint and retard yourself dead Wow. You suck.

Also, Men are mostly scum.

Edit: I also find it ironic that the 'we need to get back to being manly men!' bullshit is coming from 2 guys who frequent a Star Wars debating forum. Wow, butch.

The problem is that I'm TOO much man and I have to tone it down a bit, so I frequent the Star Wars forum.

Of course, why didn't I see it!!1!

Meh

I do think that guys raised by only their mothers are less inclined toward sports, etc..... And cry WAY to much......

However, they are more inclined to reading, studying, etc, making them still contributing members of society

And yes, alot of guys are bastards that need a punch in the face, but hey, dont count ALL of us in ONE category

yay for dads!

Sorry, you're not right or wrong because there is no right or wrong. Everything is relative! Also if you don't agree with the death penalty, you're a murder. If you don't like Obama, you're racist, and if you don't agree with same sex marriages, you're a bigot/religious fanatic!

Well you are a bigot. Truth sucks doesn't it?

Originally posted by Lucius
Well you are a bigot. Truth sucks doesn't it?

I rest my case🙂

I've yet to meet a liberal who doesn't address his arguments and rebuttals with extremes or emotions. Just in case, here's the definition of "bigot".

Main Entry: big·ot
Pronunciation: \ˈbi-gət\
Function: noun
Etymology: French, hypocrite, bigot
Date: 1660
: a person obstinately or intolerantly devoted to his or her own opinions and prejudices; especially : one who regards or treats the members of a group (as a racial or ethnic group) with hatred and intolerance

I bolded certain portions of this definition as I'm convinced you have no idea how to use the word and probably overheard somebody else say it so you thought it was cool and you would get people to believe that you apparently think for yourself...Or something.

Originally posted by Letum Lettow
Also, misandry much?

The only reason boys today eschew atheltics and fun is because theya have been consistently raised by women, who are week and start teaching crap like crying is okay being storng on the inside is wqhat counts.

the america of the 40s was built on manliness, this america is built on libtarded gayness and neo-feminism.

And it shows.

I hope that this post isn't serious...

Anyway, remember that everyone needs to be civil in here, as you do everywhere else on the boards.

Originally posted by Letum Lettow
"How about you do your ****ing job and close this ****ing thread, retard?" -- Letum Lettow

Thanks REXXXX

Also, misandry much?

The only reason boys today eschew atheltics and fun is because theya have been consistently raised by women, who are week and start teaching crap like crying is okay being storng on the inside is wqhat counts.

the america of the 40s was built on manliness, this america is built on libtarded gayness and neo-feminism.

And it shows.


Yeah, back before we let the women out of the kitchen and gave the niggahs the vote everything was great.

If you ask me, though, our first mistake was allowing girls to go to school.

Seriously, we let the women-folk get their edumacation and everything got thrown into a downward spiral. Goddamn *****.

...

It hurt me to write that.

Originally posted by REXXXX
I hope that this post isn't serious...

Anyway, remember that everyone needs to be civil in here, as you do everywhere else on the boards.

He's partially right. Our one big mistake was segregation. In the 40s and 50s, we achieved our economic peak as the greatest economic power of all time. We were more educated and people did things that were more "appropriate". We had real musicians back in those times. Everyone was more prosperous. Now our society is dominated by social networks, reality tv, and porn.

DS
Our one big mistake was segregation.

😐

Originally posted by Gideon
😐

This is the one thing liberals or anyone who claims that as time moves on, progression automatically does as well, use as an example of how our society has progressed beyond the 40s and 50s. Mind you, they have nothing else. Our society dicked this one up bad but that doesn't negate all the positives that occured in the 40s and 50s. It only started going downhill at the dawn of the counterculture.

Anyway, banned Hewhoknowsall permanently. He socked to avoid the ban that he had the last couple days, and had had three bans total. No need to keep that guy around.

Btw, the Sorgo sock a few pages back was Moriarty/Knightfall socking.

Lucius
Well you are a bigot. Truth sucks doesn't it?

Well you are a pseudointellectual liberal pussy douchebag who denies his homosexuality as a defense mechanism.

We were economic, moral, and artistic bastions back in the fifties. No one really cares about segregation or womens' rights or yellows anymore. Get over your weak, fat, antisocial, womanly black self. I hate your generation.

*phew*

REXXXX, unless HK was secretly a student of Nebaris, I'm pretty sure The Contact wasn't him.

The Contact made a bunch of reports attacking people who were debating with HKWA. Highly suspicious.

Either way, HKWA had outstayed his welcome; I banned him recently without realizing that he had been banned two times prior. It is intended that the third time be the charm of the permanent variety.

I wish I could make money off of socks registering on KMC somehow...

Somehow? Charge $10 per sock. Problem solved.