its just a little hard to take your point seriously because like i said its a stupid one. no one was denying that there isnt bias on both sides of the court. you can bring up the bias in alimony/custody cases and i can bring up the double standards that exist between men who cheat or women who cheat or how women are tried more harshly for child murder than men are, but why? no one said anything to the contrary. youre just being an ass because other people have the nerve to voice their appreciation for something that you disagree with on some fundamental level.
Originally posted by AthenasTrgrFngr
its just a little hard to take your point seriously because like i said its a stupid one. no one was denying that there isnt bias on both sides of the court. you can bring up the bias in alimony/custody cases and i can bring up the double standards that exist between men who cheat or women who cheat or how women are tried more harshly for child murder than men are, but why? no one said anything to the contrary.
I think it's hard to take anything you say seriously at all because 10 minutes later and you are on a completely different wavelength. Nobody was talking about bias on both sides of the court because the bias is only on one side of the court in divorce proceedings. You then start comparing men and women regarding murder when the comparison is a man vs. a woman in the same case. Please refrain from typing to me until you learn to use common sense.
Originally posted by Dr McBeefington
I think it's hard to take anything you say seriously at all because 10 minutes later and you are on a completely different wavelength. Nobody was talking about bias on both sides of the court because the bias is only on one side of the court in divorce proceedings. You then start comparing men and women regarding murder when the comparison is a man vs. a woman in the same case. Please refrain from typing to me until you learn to use common sense.
Originally posted by AthenasTrgrFngr
i dont care to only discuss alimony and custody because my point is on a larger scale. im saying that ins society there is a definite bias toward both genders depending on the situation. if you want to narrow it down to one specific instance to prove your point, go ahead. no one is saying that youre wrong about divorce court judges being privvy toward women.
Then please humor me and explain the bias towards the men in other proceedings? If you're referring to criminal law, the bias is justified and is therefore not really a bias. Stastically, since men commit the majority of crimes, they are going to be judged more harshly. Such a statistic doesn't exist in divorce proceedings.
really? statistically children are cared for better by their mothers then they are by their fathers. in terms of things such as abuse the last time i checked, even after adjusting for the ratios of men who take care of children to women who take care of children, men are like ten times more likely to physically abuse children under their custody. so theres your stastic. . also, considering that 90% of physical abuse crimes invovle a man beating up on a women, its obvious that the fact of the matter, is that from a statistical point of view, men tend to be violent ****s toward other people. so it makes sense for a judge to be biased against the gender that is overwhelmingly more likely to hurt a defensless child.
but regardless the entire argument about stastics is meaningless. just because a stastic supports a bias doesn't mean its not a bias. i know that that wasnt what you were trying to say, but it doesnt contradict my point that the biases are there.
"How about you do your ****ing job and close this ****ing thread, retard?" -- Letum Lettow
Thanks REXXXX
Also, misandry much?
The only reason boys today eschew atheltics and fun is because theya have been consistently raised by women, who are week and start teaching crap like crying is okay being storng on the inside is wqhat counts.
the america of the 40s was built on manliness, this america is built on libtarded gayness and neo-feminism.
And it shows.
Originally posted by AthenasTrgrFngr
really? statistically children are cared for better by their mothers then they are by their fathers. in terms of things such as abuse the last time i checked, even after adjusting for the ratios of men who take care of children to women who take care of children, men are like [b]ten times more likely to physically abuse children under their custody. so theres your stastic. . also, considering that 90% of physical abuse crimes invovle a man beating up on a women, its obvious that the fact of the matter, is that from a statistical point of view, men tend to be violent ****s toward other people. so it makes sense for a judge to be biased against the gender that is overwhelmingly more likely to hurt a defensless child.
Please show me these made up statistics and if they even exist, how they relate to things such as divorce proceedings. Your entire argument is pointless.
Lucius
It really is a shame, I mean damn, nowadays a good honest man can't beat his wife without the law getting in his way.And those damn women, thinking they can hold real jobs instead of taking care of the kids and the house. Why, they're all gonna turn into lesbians before we know it.
REXXXX
As for the rest of you...There is absolutely zero need for me to log on and read through two to three pages of tearing down one person, no matter how much you dislike him. Next time I see something like this happening, you are ALL getting warnings.
LL
Le gasp!EDIT: By the by, can Gideon or someone with the appropriate sources give me the official line of the Empire's 25,000 ISDs? Jaden's gonna want proof and I don't own those books.
The figure originates with Grand Admiral Pellaeon in the Hand of Thrawn duology, specifically Specter of the Past (I believe). The figure was confirmed in the Complete Star Wars Encyclopedia: "all told, the Empire built more than 25,000 Star Destroyers."
Originally posted by Dr McBeefington
Please show me these made up statistics and if they even exist, how they relate to things such as divorce proceedings. Your entire argument is pointless.
yeah i was wrong about the statistics. apparently things have gotten worse since i last looked at them.
Children are at astronomically greater risk of physical abuse in the care of a man than in the care of a woman."
and also not 90%.
if you cant see how thats relevant to bias in child custody cases then youre beyond help.
oh i see youre doing what you did earlier by further specifying to dodge my points and affirm your opinion. it started off with talking about bias in favor of women in courts in general, then after i smashed that you narrowed it down to just men vs. women in court cases, and now that ive smashed that you want to narrow it down futher and pretend that you were only referring to the asset distribution after divorce. let me guess, you were never talking about custody battles in the first place amirite!?!?
no matter my points been made very clearly. there are definitely biases on both sides of the gender spectrum. i win 😄