Originally posted by Lord Lucien
Where?
At my shul. And my arguments were solid.. Way too much time spent arguing on here and getting the "other side" which definitely did wonders for me. People were trying to tell me that they know for a fact God exists while I was trying to tell them "no you don't". That's the gist of it.
Originally posted by Dr McBeefington
At my shul. And my arguments were solid.. Way too much time spent arguing on here and getting the "other side" which definitely did wonders for me. People were trying to tell me that they know for a fact God exists while I was trying to tell them "no you don't". That's the gist of it.
What's their proof?
Originally posted by Dr McBeefingtonI've had those arguments. My targets eventually conceded that it was faith, not fact. But at the same time, faith=fact for them. Idiots.
At my shul. And my arguments were solid.. Way too much time spent arguing on here and getting the "other side" which definitely did wonders for me. People were trying to tell me that they know for a fact God exists while I was trying to tell them "no you don't". That's the gist of it.
They continuously argue that every major religion excepts the revelation at Sinai, that every Jew was present at Sinai, and to make up a story like that would be impossible if every original Jew told the exact same story and the exact same story passed through the ages. My response to that was "yea, it gives more credence to Judaism being correct or a truth but that doesn't ultimately prove anything." They even use the concept of preponderance of evidence and I keep trying to tell them that that concept doesn't constitute fact, especially since it's weaker than "beyond a reasonable doubt."
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/dd140d16-e2c2-11df-8a58-00144feabdc0.html
I always enjoy reading articles written by clueless morons. I wonder if anyone here has read "Vision of the Annointed". It's always cute to see a politician enact something, have it go wrong, and then claim it would have been a lot worse had his "provision" not been enacted.
Originally posted by Nephthys
Man, TROLL REPRODUCTION SURE IS WEIRD!
Have you played through Alterniabound yet?
Also, NOTICE: THIS PRODUCT IS EXCEPTIONAL IN MANY WAYS, ONE OF WHICH IS THAT IT HAS PUSHED GLENN BECK SLIGHTLY CLOSER TOWARD RECOGNITION AS A |00n
LOL WUT
Wave Existence
Junior MemberRegistered: Oct 2010
Question Evening.
Good morning. I have a proposition for you. A mutually beneficial proposition that if agreed by you will propel the two of us into the two most powerful members on this forum.
I used to be a member here, that frequented the video game forum. I cannot create a new account and have it post there with the same views, as it will be swiftly banned every time I try. A combination of the age of the account, being a new one, and the similar views to that of a banned member, is all that they will deem is required in thinking the accounts are the same and banning it.
Which is where you come in. A long time and well established member of a different forum, that the moderators will clearly not identify as me, even if sharing the same views that I did, you are not someone that will be suspected as being me. What I propose is that I occasionally get to send you stuff via private message which you can then post publicly in the forums.
What do you get out of this, you ask? You may use my account in the same manner. While you may use your account in whatever manner you wish I'm sure there are a few things you might want to say, but wouldn't be willing to, in case it damages your reputation or possibly puts your account in danger of being banned. I will allow you to do the same thing that I plan to be doing.
This proposition will give the two of us unparalleled power on these boards, beyond even the moderators themselves. The ability to use two accounts as you wish with absolutely no risk of being caught is a powerful thing.
A freakin PM I got.