Originally posted by Slash_KMC
I want to quote a lot of things from that article too, except he really underpowers Revan, he just calls him "an incredibly powerful Jedi".A lot of what he says seems to be pointed at Legend though:
"Let’s set the record straight right now: games and books are NOT the same thing. In a game, we have to constantly progress the power level of a character to keep things interesting. In a book, any character progression is slow and arduous – it often makes up the character arc, which is the whole point of the book. The two mediums are meant to convey different experiences and the two representations of the character cannot simply be laid overtop of each other.
I think his main concern is people arguing game mechanics instead of feats which is prohibited by canon anyways. So rather than underpowering Revan (who he created) he's likely acting out against those who argue Revan wins because he killed a hundred Sith.