Originally posted by PVS
you cant possibly mean that 😑
or are you just baiting the next EMOTIONAL RANT MEMBER!!!!!!!!!11111
Bardock, you realize what you're about to do here. One more comment like that, and we're going to start seeing the mocking ZOMG! ROFL!!!1111's from PVS. We've already got the "111"'s.
Originally posted by botankus
Bardock, you realize what you're about to do here. One more comment like that, and we're going to start seeing the mocking ZOMG! ROFL!!!1111's from PVS. We've already got the "111"'s.
ok, im going to do an impression of a particular member's response to the freedom of speech point:
how can you POSSIBLY support CHILD MOLESTERS!?!??!??!??!?!?!?!?
why not just let MURDERERS and RAPISTS have their own party???!?!?!?
im sorry, but kiddie porn is just WRONG and if you disagree then your INSANE!!!!!!!!!
Originally posted by PVS
ok, im going to do an impression of a particular member's response to the freedom of speech point:how can you POSSIBLY support CHILD MOLESTERS!?!??!??!??!?!?!?!?
why not just let MURDERERS and RAPISTS have their own party???!?!?!?
im sorry, but kiddie porn is just WRONG and if you disagree then your INSANE!!!!!!!!!
😂
Originally posted by PVS
you cant possibly mean that 😑
or are you just baiting the next EMOTIONAL RANT MEMBER!!!!!!!!!11111
Hmm, well, I actually think some of the things they say are reasonable:
"The party said it wanted to cut the legal age for sexual relations to 12 and eventually scrap the limit altogether."
I believe that there is not just one line for legal consent. There might be 12 year olds that are emotionally strong enough to decide it, while there are 16 year olds that just shouldn't hve sex.
"It also supports allowing pornography to be broadcast on daytime television, with only violent pornography limited to the late evening."
I see nothing wrong with that at all.
"youths aged 16 and up should be allowed to appear in pornographic films and prostitute themselves."
Sure, whatever floats their boat.
"Sex with animals should be allowed although abuse of animals should remain illegal"
Also, why not, we can slaughter animals but not have sex with them....weird.
"The party also said everybody should be allowed to go naked in public and promotes legalizing all soft and hard drugs "
FREEDOM
"free train travel for all"
****ing socialists....
Now, I realize they do that for selfish reasons and most their ideas are oretty ridiculous, but with some mI do indeed agree.
Originally posted by botankus
Bardock, you realize what you're about to do here. One more comment like that, and we're going to start seeing the mocking ZOMG! ROFL!!!1111's from PVS. We've already got the "111"'s.
Hehe....that will be fun.
Wow...okay this is a tough one.
You guys know there is a difference between a non-active Pedophile and an active Pedophile.
Active Pedophiles have already molested children, while non-active pedophiles simply HAVE the desire but never acted on it.
Anyways,
Personally, i don't see anything wrong with a 16 year old having a sexual relation with someone above 18, as long as its mutually consentual. Most Sixteen year olds are perfectly fine having sexual relationships, its not like they are going to be traumatized by sexual encounters, nor is it like they don't have the ability to give consent.
But a 12 year old ? Most 12 year olds are just STARTING to become sexual beings, not fully aware of what sex is really about..they usually go by thier own impulses and by influences from freinds, TV, etc.
I don't beleive 12 year olds have the FULL ability to give consent to a sexual relation with an adult who is so much smarter, simply because most 12 year olds don't even know who they are yet, they are just starting to get thier own idenitities....they'll usually say YES to any sexual advance from someone they find attractive.
(Not to stereotype....but the decision to be responsible for sexual activity is almost an impossibility for 12 year olds to handle)
I still think a 12 year old is too young, sorry guys.
Should Pedilfiles be BARRED from trying to push some rights? Ofcourse not, they should be heard.....but they should also understand that any relationship they take should be that of absolute mutual consent.
12 is too low.
But PVS is right; we cannot muzzle someone calling for a change in the law.
It is also worth noting that screaming out that they are encouraging child abuse and paedophilia is a very relative thing. I suspect people would say the same if their target age was 14, yet that already IS the age in a lot of countries, including Canada. 13 in Spain, I believe.
So you cannot pretend this is something the human race is universal on. It is cultural attitude. I also seem to remember the age was 12 in the Netherlands not so long ago, though the particulars of how that worked escape me. So in their culture it is not so foreign.
Originally posted by Slay
I heard about it today while eating breakfast.
Most people wave it away,but here you American people are,making a COMPLETE thread about it.
What a surprise.
half the people posting in it are not american. nice job, frikin eletist.
nice avatar btw. anthrax rules. although they are just stupid americans.
Originally posted by PVS
half the people posting in it are not american. nice job, frikin eletist.nice avatar btw. anthrax rules. although they are just stupid americans.
But as you sad half the people posting here are not American meaning the other half are.
That is why I posted it like that.
Again,no harm meant.