Originally posted by Rampant ox
Why the f**k is everyone saying that Mace is above the Count. In saber skills the Count is better by a reasonably large margin (purely because his Makashi style is made for lightsaber comat). And then in force abilities they are on par with the Count possibly having a very marginal lead. I say this because he has around 80 years of knowledge of both the light and dark side whereas Mace has had only around 40 years of experience with the light side.
And I am sure that your considerable bias in Dooku's favor would have nothing to do with that. This coming from the man who labeled him as "the greatest Dark Lord of the Sith ever". Dooku was a pawn. A talented one, but a pawn nonetheless.
Count Dooku is an incredibly powerful Force-user. But his usage of Makashi doesn't guarentee him a victory at all.
Anakin defeated him in a contest of sabers, despite Dooku's proficiency in Makashi - and Yoda was able to overwhelm Count Dooku in a saber fight in both AotC and Dark Rendezvous - despite his Makashi proficiency.
Your point? Moot.
Count Dooku isn't ahead of Mace by a considerable margin. Consider: Only three years prior to RotS, Dooku was able to own Anakin and Kenobi at the same time, and yet in RotS, Anakin overcame him. So, in the span of thirteen years, I am positive that Mace improved dramatically - as he was already described as a lightsaber prodigy - like Count Dooku.
Your point? Moot.
We can only speculate about who would win. But your crap about experience means nothing. Yoda has 900 years of experience, but he didn't WTFpwn Sidious - who only had 60 years worth. Sidious has more experience than Mace, but he didn't WTFpwn Mace. Dooku has 70 years of experience, compared to Anakin's 13, and he didn't pwn Anakin by the time of RotS.