Originally posted by TheKahn
Well, at least given the lengths of the "official" posts the judges should be able to tell which ones are non-official and can be ignored fairly quickly when they look back through the debate. 😬
Originally posted by Adam Warlock
I understand what your saying, but multiple non official posts start sounding like arguments to me.
Agreed.
Let's try and remove them unless they're direct responses to a specific question. Even then, you can often deal with the question in an official response. The non-official posts are beginning to bug me.
For the best explaination/answer your gonna have to ask Validus
For my part: Lobo had to chop Jack T Chance's hand to get the ring and it still wouldnt come off his finger 😬
The rings auto defenses (which the user does not need to control) should be able to handle that. 😬
besides the ring doesnt even need to be on the users hand for the user to use it.....
Quoted from battle 4:
Originally posted by leonidas
ps--bw, i think digi eliminated non-official posts. sorry bro, but the above is gonna count . . . 🙁
I didn't eliminate them...I just got angry with them. Let's cut it out, and quick looking for 'loophole-type' ways of getting around the post limit. Deal with questions and concerns in your 9 posts, or don't deal with them at all.
I've also asked that the peanut gallery be silenced a bit (i.e. whoever isn't in the match). Questions and rule-clarifications are one thing, but anything that could be construed as an argument should not come from observers...judges included.
I realize, to this extent, that Ill's comments have come under some attention. We should remember that he's showing an amazing amount of interest in the matches and trying to help things run smoothly. I've asked him (and any others) to hold off the comments a bit, not because I'm upset but because I think the battles should be pretty much dominated by the participants. The less anyone has to interject, the better.
Going back to edit a bunch of it would be to eliminate potentially valid discussion. But I'd like it to stop as much as possible.
Thank you.
Originally posted by DigiMark007
Quoted from battle 4:I didn't eliminate them...I just got angry with them. Let's cut it out, and quick looking for 'loophole-type' ways of getting around the post limit. Deal with questions and concerns in your 9 posts, or don't deal with them at all.
I've also asked that the peanut gallery be silenced a bit (i.e. whoever isn't in the match). Questions and rule-clarifications are one thing, but anything that could be construed as an argument should not come from observers...judges included.
I realize, to this extent, that Ill's comments have come under some attention. We should remember that he's showing an amazing amount of interest in the matches and trying to help things run smoothly. I've asked him (and any others) to hold off the comments a bit, not because I'm upset but because I think the battles should be pretty much dominated by the participants. The less anyone has to interject, the better.
Going back to edit a bunch of it would be to eliminate potentially valid discussion. But I'd like it to stop as much as possible.
Thank you.
er, i was kidding . . . 😕