Darth Revan Vs Palpatine

Started by Sin Harvest10 pages

Maybe, maybe not. There was a field around the Star Forge that prevented ships from getting near it but then again it could have been deactivated at the time or it doesn't work on all ships because the Sith Fleet wouldn't be able to leave the Star Forge then.

It's unlikely. He would have had to be able to work with the ship with perfect precision and cohesion after he gained the Rakata's trust and worked his way through the Temple...

Their isn't a clear record on what happened that day. So it's a huge unknown and shouldn't be considered to be from Revan until it has been proven like with KoToR III

got a question for u guys. For the ppl that said that Revan could beat Palpatine, then why did most of u guys vote Palpatine in "the best overall sith"?

Best =/= most powerful.

Originally posted by Razielim
Confirmed (sith) kills for Revan:

- Dark Jedi master on Taris
- Three Dark Jedi
- Bandon
- Bastila (Defeated)
- Malak

That was a Sith Governer not Dark Jedi Master.

He also killed :

Dark Jedi Master on Manan Killed 4 of them on the Leviathan, killed two Sith Head Masters of the Academy on Korriban and killed the Sith Master in the Rakatan Empire who was the third Most Powerful in the entire Empire 1st Malak 2nd Bastila 3rd Sith Master.

i'd say revan is better with the force but with a saber i'd say palptine it would be close but revan would win

Originally posted by mikester
got a question for u guys. For the ppl that said that Revan could beat Palpatine, then why did most of u guys vote Palpatine in "the best overall sith"?

Because Palpatine is the best in the fact that he did something no other Sith did, he destroyed the Jedi and took control of the entire galaxy.

Ehh . . . I think that Revan would defeat any PT Jedi or Sith Lord in single combat. Not WTFpwn, but soundly defeat - and that includes Sidious. But that is my personal opinion.

Still good points are offered -

- Palpatine's electrocuted dozens of Stormtroopers (killing them instantly) in a single blast.

- Palpatine's Force Lightning has also have dealt mortal wounds to several Jedi before.

If this is RotS - Sidious stands a chance, but I think Revan beats him.

If this is anything after RotS, like ANH, I think Revan has a great chance of losing.

If this is Dark Empire, Revan gets his ass handed to him.

Also, "best" (I have to assume) is indicative of achievements.

In terms of achievements, Palpatine is above any other Sith Lord. But this is a versus mode where his political/military achievements bear nothing on the argument.

I think that RotS Sidious would lose to Revan . . . but it's just my opinion. 😖

[QUOTE=6728153]Originally posted by Razielim
[B]Confirmed (sith) kills for Revan:

- Dark Jedi master on Taris
- Three Dark Jedi
- Bandon
- Bastila (Defeated)
- Malak

well, when you think about it Palpatine didn't kill much

-Agen Kolar
-Sassee Tiin
-Kit Fisto

and thats it.. i didnt count mace because tekincally, he didnt kill him

Yes,he did.Anakin may have sliced Mace's hand off,but it was Palpatine who dealt the final blow.

Revan is in no way defeating Palpatine or Yoda, or Mace for that matter. the PT was the Jedi golden age for a reason

Was the PT era actually stated as the 'golden age of the jedi'? If it was, that does not necessarily mean that it was the time when the jedi were strongest, but more so a time where there is relative peace. That would be a golden age for the jedi, as relative peace is the jedi order's ultimate goal and hope.

George Lucas was specifically referring to lightsaber combat...

WOW that's incredibly hard. hmm, I'd have to say Revan though. Barely. Sidous took complete control of the galaxy making him the greatest sith ever in my respect, but not he most powerful.

I believe that the power of force users in the star wars galaxy have greatly diminished due to the fact that there are constant wars and battles. Knowledge is lost. Palpatine derived most of his power from the extremely potent Kyber crystal he wielded.

Judging from the fact that there is a 3,000 year gap between the rule of Marka Ragnos and Reven, concurrently there is a 4,000 year gap between Reven and Sidous. I believe The most powerful force users 4000 years ago greatly surpasses the greatest force user of ROTS.

I just wish we had more to go on in terms of proof of revans power, as i am sure KOTOR has played down his skills for a more viable gaming experience.

WOW that's incredibly hard. hmm, I'd have to say Revan though. Barely. Sidous took complete control of the galaxy making him the greatest sith ever in my respect, but not he most powerful.

I agree. Though PT Sidious could possibly take him - and DE Sidious would waste him.

I believe that the power of force users in the star wars galaxy have greatly diminished due to the fact that there are constant wars and battles. Knowledge is lost. Palpatine derived most of his power from the extremely potent Kyber crystal he wielded.

Firstly, this makes no sense. Wars and battles would allow them sufficient environments and situations to practice the Force and use it often. Knowledge could also be gained in wars as well.

Secondly, erm . . . did you read "Supershadow"?

Judging from the fact that there is a 3,000 year gap between the rule of Marka Ragnos and Reven, concurrently there is a 4,000 year gap between Reven and Sidous. I believe The most powerful force users 4000 years ago greatly surpasses the greatest force user of ROTS.

This also doesn't make sense. Why would the "ancient Sith" have more knowledge about the Force when - much like technology and civilization - the older something gets, the more refined and experienced it gets. It expands.

Do people still actually believe SS about the Kaiburr Crystal?

The Kaliburr crystal is canon but the Kyber crystal isn't. . .

Originally posted by Razielim
George Lucas was specifically referring to lightsaber combat...

Well I heard him state that the PT era is the golden age of saber dueling , however IIRC he was saying that it was the golden age of saber dueling in comparison to the OT era and solely relative to the movies.