Originally posted by EPIIIBITESJust to tell you, the antique shop owner does have to sign a release form, so this leads me to believe that either he didn't care about Borat breaking his stuff, Borat had permission to break his stuff, or the stuff was already bought by the movie company.
What a find!!!This is for you people out there without a conscience or who are incapable of standing back and saying "this is in fact not cool or funny", because the thought of even saying something like that doesn't even pass your mind, since it would in itself be extremely uncool...
...yeah I'm sure you don't get what I mean...
So here's a review of an intelligent critic who saw in Borat EXACTLY what I've been talking about...Interestingly enough, I was able to pick up this essence of the movie after only watching a few snippets.
...yes I'm that good.
- "The point is that the movie's funniest laughs come from people and their reactions, not the material written by Cohen and his crew. Their humor is mean, not funny. Cohen spends the movie gladly accepting the kindness of the strangers who accept him despite his strange looks and demeanor, then takes advantage of their good graces by turning them into laughing stocks for his audience. Cohen sometimes goes too far to get those laughs, like when he starts breaking things in a Mom 'n' Pop shop "by accident." Tom Green has been doing this same schtick for years and been attacked by critics for it. The only difference is that Borat uses a funny foreign accent, which apparently makes it "more intelligent." Certainly Andy Kaufman had a stellar career doing a similar character without resorting to racial epithets, and Eugene Hutz of New York band Gogol Bordello, an actual Eastern European, plays a similar cartoon character onstage--one slightly modified for Liev Schreiber's "Everything Is Illuminated"--without it being so offensive.
And then there's the anti-Semitism, something so ridiculously flagrant that I would seriously question anyone who finds the jokes funny. The Jewish people have had to face very real oppression and racism for thousands of years. "Borat" makes it seem like it's okay to laugh at that, starting with his town's tradition of "The Running of the Jews," as ridiculous caricatures with giant paper maché heads being chased down the street by kids. This idea is reintroduced when Borat and his producer find themselves "trapped" in a bed and breakfast run by a kindly Jewish couple, and they start throwing money at cockroaches to fend them off. The fact that Cohen is himself Jewish doesn't make it any better than Mel Gibson's more subtle anti-Semitism, nor does it make it any less irresponsible to release a movie that makes light of racism purely in the name of comedy."
It's unbelievable, the difference between him/myslef and the one-dimensional audience like you who doesn't have the capacity to see the difference between something funny and something wrong...you just group it all together...and at the end of the day, you're just a fan of the genre and not of what's in front of you.
...yes again, I'm sure you don't get what I mean...
And I’m betting the responses to this post will be the same as all the responses people have been giving all this time, the argument essentially being "you don't get it, 'cause if you got it you'd find it funny"...Wow.
So yeah. The critic and I don't get it. You guys get it because you're clearly more intelligent, laid back, unpretentious…and, oh yeah, cool.
BTW. This last post just seriously pwnd you!