Re: Unfortunately, Superman Returns Is Just Super-Bad. Here's Why.
Originally posted by Dr. Zaius
OK. Everyone release their collective breath. This movie is absolutely unforgivable! Not just disappointing, not just average, but terrible! As expected, the CGI was great--good thing too, because the story was nonexistent. Nonetheless, an iconic screen shot here and there does not a movie make. Here are but a few of the problems:1. The need for Superman's return is necessitated by the hero's 5 year leave of absence from earth, during which time, he presumably travels to Krypton in order to confirm its destruction. I say "presumably" since we never get to see any of this search, only a rehashed CGI effect of Krypton exploding. If you're going to use a return to Krypton as a plot device--and its an intriguing idea--develop it! Dont' leave it hanging there like an unzipped fly.
2. Lex Luthor is about as threatening as Star Jones in a verbal joust with Barbara Walters. The movie opens with him swindling an old widow out of her fortune. Are you shaking in your boots yet? Isn't this guy supposed to be the smartest guy on the planet? Sigh...I suppose the screenwriters, out of some misguided desire to one-up Hackman's original performance, decided complete emasculation of Superman's nemesis was the only route to go. Kudos on that guys! Oh yeah, and in case you missed the point that this guy has no penis, the movie made sure to show Parker Posey literally dump his "crystals" into the ocean. At least that was less painful than witnessing the relentless zinging of the movie's villain with "you're bald" jokes.
3. Lois Lane and Routh are as flat as pancakes. There is no emotional depth to the characters at all. I guess the writers realized this when they were penning the script because, a la "Family Ties", "The Cosby Show", "Phantom Menace", or "Full House", they decided to hide their faltering story by turning Lois Lane's 5 year old kid into a major character. As expected, this was typical bait and switch. Bring out the kid everytime we need a tear. And, for extra effect, lets make him speech impaired and only utter things like "Mommy, will he get better? I want him to get better."
Get my gun.4. Luthor's plan to destroy Superman starts off well--steal Kryptonian technology and use it to conquer the world and kill Superman--but leaves something to be desired in the execution. Luthor uses a crystal from the Fortress of Solitude to create a new continent--one based on the crystaline geology of Krypton. OK, so far. What now? Build some kick-ass Kryptonian weapons? Revive some long-dormant Kryptonian A.I. that runs amok? Build a suit of Kryptonian battle armor to give Supes a run for his money? None of the above. If you said, kick back, smoke a cigar and play a couple of hands of No-Limit Texas Hold-Em, you'd be more on the right track. Yawn...
5. What else? Oh yeah. Lois has a live-in boyfriend played by X-Men's James Marsden. If only they had let Marsden unleash a well-placed optic blast to eleviate the mind-numbing boredom of watching him squirm from one insecurity complex to the next. I guess I can't blame the guy. If I knew my girlfriend's ex was the last son of Krypton, I'd probably be a little uneasy too. However, all sympathy for the character quickly evaporates as he is remorselessly turned into a Women's Sensitivity Seminar Poster Boy.
6. In the end, I didn't know what to be irritated by the most--the film's inability to engage me in any way by the story, or its heavy-handed attempts to endorse some limp-d--k vision of the sensitive, modern man.
There has been some recent attention surrounding the question, "Is Superman Returns a gay film"? I don't think "gay" quite hits the mark on this one. Rather, terms like "limp", "flacid",and "impotent" come to mind.
I couldn't agree with you more. Bring in Darkside or Doomsday or someone to actually FIGHT Superman. Not OMG Lex is AGAIN using Kryptonite! Oh goodie, Lex is thinking! No wait now he's plotting! Hurray! Now he's explaining the plot!
At least Batman actually FIGHTS in his movies. Heck even in Batman and Robin (worse comic movie ever) he actually fights Mr. Freeze, Poison Ivy, and Bain. Spider-man has battled the Green Golbin, Doc Oct, Sandman, Venom, and the New Goblin. The Fantasic Four fought Doctor Doom and are now about to battle the Silver Surfer. The X-Men had Magnetio and Dark Phoenix. Bring on Doomsday! Bring on Darkside! Bring on ANYBODY! JUST NOT LEX AGAIN!!!
Originally posted by sithsaber408WTF are you talking about?! SR sucked! No chemistry between said love couple, same old villain, pretty much contradicts itself a few times(IE; Superman's costume doesn't sustain any damage when reentering the atmosphere or machine gun fire, yet it just takes one nurse to rip it which brings us back to the point of SUPERMAN HAS TO GO TO THE HOSPITAL? WTF?!). It's nowhere near as good DD Director's cut, the first two Blade movies, the first two X-men movies or the Spiderman Trilogy. If this is the future of the Superman movie franchise, I'd suggest Brian Singer get his head out of his ass, quit now and go back to the X-men series, which, unlike Superman, STILL HAS potential, regardless of the third movie.
Why?Superman Returns was awesome.
It's better than xmen or spiderman and comparable with Spiderman 2 and X2.
All other Marvel films (Fantastic Four, Daredevil, Elektra) are fricken jokes.