God loves all of you even if no one else does

Started by lord xyz47 pages

Re: Re: Re: God loves all of you even if no one else does

Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
The Father, Son Jesus, and the Holy Spirit care for you.
Ha, you said care for him/her, not cares for him/her, meaning the father, son and holy spirit are all different and not the same. Also, in other threads you have said they are all god, meaning you believe in 3 gods. Not very monotheistic if you ask me.
Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
If you have asked Jesus Christ to save you from your sins then you now have a family in Heaven and on earth.
Jesus, please save me from my sins.
Okay, now I have a place in Heaven and sinse you already said, God loves me even if no one else does (and they don't) there's no point in my living on Earth. *commits suicide*
Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
The Lord understands everything that you feel and go through. The Lord puts your tears in His bottle. The Lord carefully watches over you as a shepherd keeps his eye on his sheep to protect them, guide them, and lead them to green pastures and still waters. The Lord's hold on you is so secure and safe that no one is able to snatch you from His loving hands.
Yes, and John Edwards isn't a douche.
Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
[B]1 Peter 5:7
casting all your care upon Him [God], for He [God] cares for you .

Ephesians 3:14-16
For this reason I bow my knees to the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ,from whom the whole family in heaven and earth is named, that He would grant you, according to the riches of His glory, to be strengthened with might through His Spirit in the inner man,

Psalm 56:8
You number my wanderings; Put my tears into Your bottle; Are they not in Your book?

Revelation 7:17
for the Lamb [Jesus] who is in the midst of the throne will shepherd them and lead them to living fountains of waters. And God [the Father]will wipe away every tear from their eyes.”

Revelation 21:4
And God [the Father] will wipe away every tear from their eyes; there shall be no more death, nor sorrow, nor crying. There shall be no more pain, for the former things have passed away.”

Psalm 68:5
A father of the fatherless, a defender of widows, Is God in His holy habitation.

John 10:29
My Father, who has given them to Me, is greater than all; and no one is able to snatch them out of My Father’s hand.

1 John 4:8
He who does not love does not know God, for God is love.

1 John 4:16
And we have known and believed the love that God has for us. God is love., and he who abides in love abides in God, and God in him.

Psalm 23:1-6
The LORD is your Shepherd [Charmed_Phoebe];
you shall not want [i.e. lack].
The LORD makes you [Charmed_Phoebe] to lie down in green pastures;
He leads you beside the still waters.
The LORD restores your soul;
He leads you in the paths of righteousness
For His name’s sake.
Yea, though you [Charmed_Phoebe] walk through the valley of the shadow of death,
you will fear no evil;
For [the Father, Son Jesus, and Holy Spirit] are with you;
His rod [i.e. shepherd's rod] and His staff
[i.e. shepherd's staff], they comfort you.
The LORD prepares a table before [Charmed_Phoebe] in the presence
of your enemies;
He anoints your head with oil;
Your cup runs over.
Surely goodness and mercy shall follow you
All the days of your life;
And you will dwell in the house of the LORD
Forever. [/B]

I would like to ask where you copy and paste these bible quotes from. You don't make it up, I can tell by how it's been written when I quote it. So please JesusIsAlive, show me the link. Or do you have a word document with the Bible written on it and you copy n paste from there?

Re: God loves all of you even if no one else does

Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
Why does God love us so much? Well, the Word of God--the Holy Bible--tells us that God is love. Love is a Person, His Name is Jesus Christ.
God has concern for humanity but no one in particular. Trust me.

Re: Re: God loves all of you even if no one else does

Originally posted by redcaped
God has concern for humanity but no one in particular. Trust me.

That is where you are wrong. God does have concern for people in particular as well as collectively. Trust you? I don't even know you.

Re: Re: Re: God loves all of you even if no one else does

Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
That is where you are wrong. God does have concern for people in particular as well as collectively. Trust you? I don't even know you.

None of us know you either...why should any of us trust you ?

Hypocrit...

You can trust me but I would never trust you...word back.

Re: Re: Re: God loves all of you even if no one else does

Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
The Father, Son Jesus, and the Holy Spirit care for you. If you have asked Jesus Christ to save you from your sins then you now have a family in Heaven and on earth. The Lord understands everything that you feel and go through. The Lord puts your tears in His bottle. The Lord carefully watches over you as a shepherd keeps his eye on his sheep to protect them, guide them, and lead them to green pastures and still waters. The Lord's hold on you is so secure and safe that no one is able to snatch you from His loving hands.

[B]1 Peter 5:7
casting all your care upon Him [God], for He [God] cares for you .

Ephesians 3:14-16
For this reason I bow my knees to the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ,from whom the whole family in heaven and earth is named, that He would grant you, according to the riches of His glory, to be strengthened with might through His Spirit in the inner man,

Psalm 56:8
You number my wanderings; Put my tears into Your bottle; Are they not in Your book?

Revelation 7:17
for the Lamb [Jesus] who is in the midst of the throne will shepherd them and lead them to living fountains of waters. And God [the Father]will wipe away every tear from their eyes.”

Revelation 21:4
And God [the Father] will wipe away every tear from their eyes; there shall be no more death, nor sorrow, nor crying. There shall be no more pain, for the former things have passed away.”

Psalm 68:5
A father of the fatherless, a defender of widows, Is God in His holy habitation.

John 10:29
My Father, who has given them to Me, is greater than all; and no one is able to snatch them out of My Father’s hand.

1 John 4:8
He who does not love does not know God, for God is love.

1 John 4:16
And we have known and believed the love that God has for us. God is love., and he who abides in love abides in God, and God in him.

Psalm 23:1-6
The LORD is your Shepherd [Charmed_Phoebe];
you shall not want [i.e. lack].
The LORD makes you [Charmed_Phoebe] to lie down in green pastures;
He leads you beside the still waters.
The LORD restores your soul;
He leads you in the paths of righteousness
For His name’s sake.
Yea, though you [Charmed_Phoebe] walk through the valley of the shadow of death,
you will fear no evil;
For [the Father, Son Jesus, and Holy Spirit] are with you;
His rod [i.e. shepherd's rod] and His staff
[i.e. shepherd's staff], they comfort you.
The LORD prepares a table before [Charmed_Phoebe] in the presence
of your enemies;
He anoints your head with oil;
Your cup runs over.
Surely goodness and mercy shall follow you
All the days of your life;
And you will dwell in the house of the LORD
Forever. [/B]

Thank you that really cheered me up!!! 🙂

Re: Re: Re: Re: God loves all of you even if no one else does

Originally posted by Charmed_Phoebe
Thank you that really cheered me up!!! 🙂

You are welcome. God bless you.

🙂

Originally posted by debbiejo
This is what reading those chick tracts do to a person......

I happen to like and enjoy chick tracts.

"For 41 years, soul-winners worldwide have used Chick cartoon tracts to witness because CHICK TRACTS GET READ! Each one grabs the reader's attention, then clearly presents the gospel, ending with an invitation to receive Christ...."
--Jack Chick

Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
I happen to like and enjoy chick tracts.

"For 41 years, soul-winners worldwide have used Chick cartoon tracts to witness because CHICK TRACTS GET READ! Each one grabs the reader's attention, then clearly presents the gospel, ending with an invitation to receive Christ...."
--Jack Chick

Sadly while they get read that doesn't equate with conversion. And since most people agree Chick Tracts are inaccurate and insulting to the intelligence it seems far more likely people turn away from any message contained within.

Don't make me start asking the tough questions again about the content. I'm sure you don't want to be seen dodging them a second time.

Originally posted by Imperial_Samura
Sadly while they get read that doesn't equate with conversion. And since most people agree Chick Tracts are inaccurate and insulting to the intelligence it seems far more likely people turn away from any message contained within.

Don't make me start asking the tough questions again about the content. I'm sure you don't want to be seen dodging them a second time.

I have yet to dodge anyone's questions. What you dub as "dodging" I call deliberately choosing not to respond to (I am smarter than you give me credit for being pal). There are questions that I willfully decide not to answer for reasons that will stay in my counsel. But trust me, I have my reasons and they are far more wiser than you will ever know.

p.s. don't you just hate it when I talk like this? (Your probably thinking
"what did he just say?" or "what is he talking about?"

😆

Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
I have yet to dodge anyone's questions. What you dub as "dodging" I call deliberately choosing not to respond to (I am smarter than you give me credit for being pal). There are questions that I willfully decide not to answer for reasons that will stay in my counsel. But trust me, I have my reasons and they are far more wiser than you will ever know.

Actually you first made the attempt to doge by going "I believe with the overall message etc." after making the statement about how you see no lies in Chick and people that do are likely paranoid.

When pressed you just out and out refused. The ultimate dodge - "I don't like this game anymore because I am loosing so I'm taking my ball and going home" - funny, its easy to claim victory when one refuses to play.

And its interesting the questions you "chose not to answer" - I wonder why you, who are so happy to extrapolate on your beliefs and do so in such a open and comprehensive fashion decided you would refrain from answering those questions.

If you like I could go back to the tracts and come up with some more, give you a second chance...

p.s. don't you just hate it when I talk like this? (Your probably thinking
"what did he just say?" or "what is he talking about?"

😆

Strangely enough no, I wasn't thinking anything along those lines. Good try though.

Originally posted by Imperial_Samura
Actually you first made the attempt to doge by going "I believe with the overall message etc." after making the statement about how you see no lies in Chick and people that do are likely paranoid.

When pressed you just out and out refused. The ultimate dodge - "I don't like this game anymore because I am loosing so I'm taking my ball and going home" - funny, its easy to claim victory when one refuses to play.

And its interesting the questions you "chose not to answer" - I wonder why you, who are so happy to extrapolate on your beliefs and do so in such a open and comprehensive fashion decided you would refrain from answering those questions.

If you like I could go back to the tracts and come up with some more, give you a second chance...

Strangely enough no, I wasn't thinking anything along those lines. Good try though.

Ok buddy ole pal, the reason that I (willfully) chose not to answer your questions about the content of Jack Chick's tracts is because I am not his personal attorney or public defender. This is truthfully why I did not bother defending him. I don't even know the man for crying out loud. If you have any axe to grind, bone to pick, or malice to bear--contact Jack personally. Why don't you ask Jack Chick yourself. It is that simple.

Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
Ok buddy ole pal, the reason that I (willfully) chose not to answer your questions about the content of Jack Chick's tracts is because I am not his personal attorney or public defender. This is truthfully why I did not bother defending him. I don't even know the man for crying out loud. If you have any axe to grind, bone to pick, or malice to bear--contact Jack personally. Why don't you ask Jack Chick yourself. It is that simple.

Ah, but it was never about the man, it was about the fact you made the statement, essentially:

"I like Chick tracts and see no lies/propaganda in them, those that do are probably paranoid."

Now, you can defend the Bible as a perfect and valid bit of evidence for your beliefs, yet when it comes to a series of cartoons that were being debated about (in a thread you started asking why people have a problem with them) you are suddenly not there to do anything.

I will stop going on about it if you here and now unconditionally retract the statement where you said people who think of them as lie filled propaganda are paranoid. Since you aren't prepared to defend the statement you should not have made it, and really you can't have your cake and eat it to. Either you stand by the statement in which case you should answer the specific examples I gave as being true of false in your mind or you don't in which case you can retract it.

The Reality? We are talking about YOUR view on Chick Tracts. YOU made a statement questioning the legitimacy of people arguments against the tracts. YOU are the one who then refused to justify your statement. YOU dodged.

Originally posted by Imperial_Samura
Ah, but it was never about the man, it was about the fact you made the statement, essentially:

"I like Chick tracts and see no lies/propaganda in them, those that do are probably paranoid."

Now, you can defend the Bible as a perfect and valid bit of evidence for your beliefs, yet when it comes to a series of cartoons that were being debated about (in a thread you started asking why people have a problem with them) you are suddenly not there to do anything.

I will stop going on about it if you here and now unconditionally retract the statement where you said people who think of them as lie filled propaganda are paranoid. Since you aren't prepared to defend the statement you should not have made it, and really you can't have your cake and eat it to. Either you stand by the statement in which case you should answer the specific examples I gave as being true of false in your mind or you don't in which case you can retract it.

The Reality? We are talking about YOUR view on Chick Tracts. YOU made a statement questioning the legitimacy of people arguments against the tracts. YOU are the one who then refused to justify your statement. YOU dodged.

Buddy...ole...pal, I don't recall ever calling anyone paranoid. I have a faint memory of saying something to the effect that maybe you or those under discussion are paranoid. But I think my statement was contingent on something else that I said. Track down the post so we can know for certain what I said. I have told you a hundred times what I think about chick tracts, in fact here is my most recent comment:

Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
I happen to like and enjoy chick tracts.

"For 41 years, soul-winners worldwide have used Chick cartoon tracts to witness because CHICK TRACTS GET READ! Each one grabs the reader's attention, then clearly presents the gospel, ending with an invitation to receive Christ...."
--Jack Chick

Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
Buddy...ole...pal, I don't recall ever calling anyone paranoid. I have a faint memory of saying something to the effect that maybe you or those under discussion are paranoid. But I think my statement was contingent on something else that I said. Track down the post so we can know for certain what I said. I have told you a hundred times what I think about chick tracts, in fact here is my most recent comment:

What a coincidence - I was talking in regards to your other post, as I pointed out. You know full well it wasn't that post I was referring to... And how fortunate I have it right here:

Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
Well, I personally happen to like Chick Tracts. I could care less for all of the conspiracy theories accusing Jack Chick of spreading his propaganda. Could it be paranoia?

Weeeeeeeell. Look at that.

I believe my problem with that was the fact "You couldn't care less that they are proven to rely on faulty evidence, intimidation tactics and proven lies? You couldn't care less that many of them contain actual conspiracy theories (the Catholic one being a prime example) that have been debunked so many times its not funny?"

It was that I was referring to, since once again you are extolling the virtues of Chick Tracts and how they "get read" and I pointed out that it doesn't matter if they get read when they do so much more damage to the claims of Jesus and the rest, and asked if you would like me to ask those questions again - the ones that when, push came to shove, you avoided answering. So either you should retract the "Could it be Paranoia?" statement or defend it.

Originally posted by Imperial_Samura
What a coincidence - I was talking in regards to your other post, as I pointed out. You know full well it wasn't that post I was referring to... And how fortunate I have it right here:

Weeeeeeeell. Look at that.

I believe my problem with that was the fact "You couldn't care less that they are proven to rely on faulty evidence, intimidation tactics and proven lies? You couldn't care less that many of them contain actual conspiracy theories (the Catholic one being a prime example) that have been debunked so many times its not funny?"

It was that I was referring to, since once again you are extolling the virtues of Chick Tracts and how they "get read" and I pointed out that it doesn't matter if they get read when they do so much more damage to the claims of Jesus and the rest, and asked if you would like me to ask those questions again - the ones that when, push came to shove, you avoided answering. So either you should retract the "Could it be Paranoia?" statement or defend it.

Could it be paranoia? That is not calling someone paranoid as you alleged that I did sir. You are the only one that thinks that they do damage. I don't think that and the myriads of Christians who disseminate them don't think that either.

Many Christians, including many mainstream Protestants and evangelicals, consider many of Chick Publications' views to be misrepresentations or distortions of general Christian or evangelical views, and as such find them offensive and embarrassing.

And the word "paranoia" hardly suffices to describe Jack Chick' s general attitude towards events around us.

Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
Could it be paranoia? That is not calling someone paranoid as you alleged that I did sir. You are the only one that thinks that they do damage. I don't think that and the myriads of Christians who disseminate them don't think that either.

Ummm... do you actually believe what you just wrote. And way to suddenly say "Oh, I didn't actually mean to imply paranoia" - funny, you think you'd have tried to use that at the time the quote was debated, but you didn't.

Shame on you for dodging with the classic "I didn't actually mean that" line.

And you are in fact. People accuse Chick of using conspiracies and propaganda. You say you don't see it - could it be paranoia? It is only paranoia if it isn't true. As said at the time there is a veritable truck load of proof that most examples and sources he draws on in his Tracts are false, pseudo history, conspiracy theory and so on.

How could it be paranoia when the arguments against the things Chick says in his Tracts are correct? Deal with that JIA - you stated you didn't see the problems others do with Chick Tracts, and you said it could be paranoia on the part of the non-Chick Tract supporters when you yourself lacked the commitment to actually support them when the push came to the shove.

I am going to repost the examples I gave at the time of the things Chick mentioned - do you want to dodge them again or admit that Chick uses falsity and misleading tactics in his Tracts? He might actually believe the garbage he spews, but that doesn't make something fact.

Originally posted by Imperial_Samura
Ummm... do you actually believe what you just wrote. And way to suddenly say "Oh, I didn't actually mean to imply paranoia" - funny, you think you'd have tried to use that at the time the quote was debated, but you didn't.

Shame on you for dodging with the classic "I didn't actually mean that" line.

And you are in fact. People accuse Chick of using conspiracies and propaganda. You say you don't see it - could it be paranoia? It is only paranoia if it isn't true. As said at the time there is a veritable truck load of proof that most examples and sources he draws on in his Tracts are false, pseudo history, conspiracy theory and so on.

How could it be paranoia when the arguments against the things Chick says in his Tracts are correct? Deal with that JIA - you stated you didn't see the problems others do with Chick Tracts, and you said it could be paranoia on the part of the non-Chick Tract supporters when you yourself lacked the commitment to actually support them when the push came to the shove.

I am going to repost the examples I gave at the time of the things Chick mentioned - do you want to dodge them again or admit that Chick uses falsity and misleading tactics in his Tracts? He might actually believe the garbage he spews, but that doesn't make something fact.

"...Oh, I didn't actually mean to imply paranoia...."

I didn't say anything of the sort about not meaning to imply anything. I just simply asked a hypothetical question based on the things that you said about chick tracts. What you said was out there and extreme.

I believe everything that I write buddy, pal.

Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
"...Oh, I didn't actually mean to imply paranoia...."

I didn't say anything of the sort about not meaning to imply anything. I just simply asked a hypothetical question based on the things that you said about chick tracts. What you said was out there and extreme.

I believe everything that I write buddy, pal.

You are jumping from position to position like a Mexican jumping bean.

You say you weren't calling people paranoid, now you are claiming it was all hypothetical despite the fact it was about you and the people in the thread who had put forward valid objections to Chick tracts which you had failed to deal with.

The things I said about Chick Tracts -

1 - Present absurd situations that don't exist in the world to try and make people think "Oh my God, that might happen to us. We better convert."

2 - Draw upon sources that have been debunked time and time again by actual reputable historians.

3 - Use fear tactics.

4 - Use falsities and non-truths

5 - Use actual conspiracy theories

6 - Make attempts to demonise people of other faiths or philosophical standings

7 - Once again - mistruths, incorrectly interpreted FACTS, makes claims which aren't supported scientifically, or statistically.

Those are the claims I and others made, and which you "hypothetically" said could be paranoia.

So support yourself or reaffirm you stance as dodger.

Is it correct what we say about Chick tracts in regard to the above problems? YES/NO

Are we paranoid for having problems with Chick Tracts based on these tactics? YES/NO

NOTHING TO DODGE JIA.