Originally posted by Regret
I looked over the post you used as quote prior to this comment. There was one misspelling which occurs due to the lack of a space between the words even and though. His grammar is not poor, he has not made more than one or two mistakes. He has a number of punctuation errors, but nothing that causes the post to be distorted or difficult to read. It would seem you are just unable to understand his view because it conflicts heavily with your own.I believe the perceived contradictions occur due to the nature of Peejayd's belief. This belief is very dissimilar to your own and as such translation to your view is impossible without very lengthy explanation. Which I do not think would aid in your replies to his posts.
I tend to like Peejayd's posts. His responses are consistent in their form. Typically he responds with quotes followed by what I consider most times decent and succinct explanations of his view on their meaning. Also, he tends to respond mainly to posts from people that believe the Bible, while avoiding much response to others. Typically it seems he responds mainly to posts referring to Bible quotation in support.
* wow, thanks, man... i'm touched... 😮
Originally posted by Regret
Now, as to format, I think his posts are slightly annoying at times. I dislike the asterisks use, and feel that his Bible quotes would be better separated from his interpretation by using the quote tags.I find his posts at times to not be extremely cohesive, I think this is probably more as to what you are referring to? Either this, or perhaps he is speaking to Bible followers and as such he is not being explanatory enough for understanding?
* hey! dots 😆