Darth Traya, Darth Nihilus, and Sion vers ROTS Sidious, Count Dooku, and ROTS Anakin

BTW, do you still want me to send you the rots novelisation?

Then it's true? What is your point besides constant irrelevant misdirection?

Originally posted by GM Nebaris
BTW, do you still want me to send you the rots novelisation?

Yes please what was the link

Nebaris, that's REALLY damn illegal

Wikipeda= not a valid source on its own

So is downloading and pirating movies lightsnake, don't act so innocent.

Originally posted by Lightsnake
Wikipeda= not a valid source on its own

ANd sorry, if its the only source, then its the only valid source.. Common sense lightsnake.. Please use it

Your e-mail's [email protected] right? 😛

Oh I forgot, it was a stupid joke in order for others to continue the ridicule..

Oh, and what have I downloaded and pirated?

And why the **** is WIKI a valid source if it appears in nothing else? ANYONE can add their fanon to Wiki and it's not approved by LFL

Are you retarded? It's the only source of Nihilus to state that he even exists, besides the KOTOR game itself. With your logic he doesn't even exist. You keep switching points in the same dead argument that ended hours ago.

Unseen, Unheard, Evil Never Dies, the Sith Dynasties, the NEC...all state Nihilius exists.

Wikipedia is not valid or canon. It is not Lucasfilm approved and thus means nothing. Kueller isn't mentioned to exist besides The New Rebellion, does he not exist?

Guess what lightsnake.. Nothing contradicts it so it exists whether you like it or not. You can spew out whatever the hell you want I don't care.. Apparently Wikipedia is a canon source only when YOU want it to be.. But considering the fact that nothing contradicts wikipedia, and the game that SUPPORTS it(which is obvious), you are wrong for the millionth time..

It's built on established canon, so it means nothing.

Show me one time where I used Wiki as my only argument, now. I've always cited my sources and anyone who uses JUST Wiki in this is an idiot. I'm afraid it's not valid. Just explain to me how a website that is not approved by LFL is valid on its own at all

#1. Why would LFL have to approve EU?
#2. What does it matter whether he approves it or not? The game and Wikipedia state the same. And as many times as you argue this and as many different ridiculous points you bring up, you will be wrong. I'm glad you're afraid that it isn't valid but as I said before, I don't have to convince you for something to be valid.

Because LFL is the company that PUBLISHES EVERYTHING STAR WARS maybe?

The Wiki article on its own is useless and just restates what the game states in most cases. Fanon's dealt with. wiki= not a valid source unless produced and made by LFL

Wikipedia is a valid source if it is the only source and it backs up the main source(the game), and there are no contradictions. Now for the last time lightsnake, you are wrong.. AGAIN..

No, it isn't. Without another source, it's nothing. It's not approved by Lucas's company at all

Lucas and his Co. Do NOT control EU, they do NOT have to approve it. The only way EU could be wrong is if it directly contradicts anything Lucas has a part of.. Now shut up, you're getting annoying with your nonsense. Accept defeat and move on, or sit here and wait while others say the same thing. You're very persisent, I give you that.. Wrong but persistent. I'll be back later to see your rebuttal and the rebuttals of others telling you you're wrong.

Originally posted by Darth Sexy
Wikipedia is a valid source if it is the only source and it backs up the main source(the game), and there are no contradictions. Now for the last time lightsnake, you are wrong.. AGAIN..

By your logic, I can go to wikipedia and edit the Nihilus article and claim that he is 30 years old for example, and it would be canon.