I' keeping my team fairly same-ish through week 1. Not perfect, but I'm pleased with my draft. ESPN's RB-happy system makes things tricky occasionally. So offer trades if you want, and I'll consider them, but I'm not actively looking for anything.
Originally posted by DanZeke25
anybody want Maroney or McGahee?
😂
Originally posted by chithappens
I want McGahee
😐
Me neither.
I'm not messing up my starting lineup, but seeing if I could improve depth at RB because I only Felix Jones as a reliable backup, while Pierre Thomas, Kevin Jones are projects.
But it dont matter, I just traded Jerry Porter for Leon Washington and Thomas Jones. Jones is much better backup than those three, and I already have Andre Johnson, Reggie Wayne, Chris Chambers, Berrian as my starters. So Porter isnt a big deal to me.
Originally posted by Smasandian
Me neither.I'm not messing up my starting lineup, but seeing if I could improve depth at RB because I only Felix Jones as a reliable backup, while Pierre Thomas, Kevin Jones are projects.
But it dont matter, I just traded Jerry Porter for Leon Washington and Thomas Jones. Jones is much better backup than those three, and I already have Andre Johnson, Reggie Wayne, Chris Chambers, Berrian as my starters. So Porter isnt a big deal to me.
honestly i dont like the veto but if people protest it i might have too. There is already one so gonna give this one a bit to see i mean a top 50 player for a guy ranked in the 300's...
Originally posted by Smasandian
You can protest trades?I think I might have done that by accident because I didnt read the email that was sent after I okayed the trade, and I hit the link with out reading it, and then noticed just after I read your post that I could protest it.
So it might be my protest by accident.
yea if it gives owners the option to protest something they feel is unfair. ultimately i have the power to allow or deny it in the end. itwasnt you who hit it.
Originally posted by DigiMark007
Porter for Jones?! Whoever's making the deal with Smas, a 1-for-1 is not always equal. Especially when you're talking about a team's 3rd WR for a starting RB on an expected playoff contender.Jesus, maybe i should be trading. Who wants Steve Smith for a top 5 RB?
the funny part is he turned down getting marshall so he could get porter...
Update on who is who:
Bullucks Gunners - Forumcrew
Go Smasandian - Smasandian
Cornbread Mangler - Botankus
Fluffy Puppies -DigiMark
Team Zeke - DanZeke
Sydney Dingoes - Celestialdemon
Houston Wolverines - Rogue Jedi
Rocas 49ers - RocasAtoll
Drowning Fishes - Chithappens
Cleveland Crush - Kram3r
Snow Canyon Warriors - Barker
Please correcrt me if I miss-remembered who was who.
Originally posted by DigiMark007
Porter for Jones?! Whoever's making the deal with Smas, a 1-for-1 is not always equal. Especially when you're talking about a team's 3rd WR for a starting RB on an expected playoff contender.Jesus, maybe i should be trading. Who wants Steve Smith for a top 5 RB?
He preposed it, I just accepted.
Porter isnt going to be the third WR. He's in competition with Northcutt, Matt Jones (if he plays) and Troy Williamson. He has a chance to becoming pretty good player again.
Originally posted by forumcrew
the funny part is he turned down getting marshall so he could get porter...
*slaps forehead*
My entire team's on the trading block. Make me offers. Unless you're Smas or forum.
😖hifty:
Originally posted by Smasandian
He preposed it, I just accepted.Porter isnt going to be the third WR. He's in competition with Northcutt, Matt Jones (if he plays) and Troy Williamson. He has a chance to becoming pretty good player again.
Still for a top 25 RB. You made out like a bandit dude. Kudos.
Originally posted by Smasandian
He preposed it, I just accepted.Porter isnt going to be the third WR. He's in competition with Northcutt, Matt Jones (if he plays) and Troy Williamson. He has a chance to becoming pretty good player again.
lol even worse, i figured you just low balled him as a starting point. the guy clearly doesnt know football.