Note what I said and the context in which I said it. "...or say 'You're acting like a little kid.'" followed by the crucial line, "You all are, without exception.".Exactly. You all are, as in you are all acting like kids. You misread the post, you misinterpreted the post, you dropped the ball and you owe an apology.
He does it yet again . . .
Okay, read what I am SAYING this time, AC.
You said everyone was acting like a little kid.
^ That is what you said. Do you understand that yet?
If we all are (According to you only, of course) Then by you this means I am as well, which I wasn't. Your opinion was bullshit and I didn't misread anything. Stop swerving into irrelevancy and except the following:
A) I was not acting childish, I was defending myself and my friends.
B) I didn't misread shit-all.
You can sit there and say "I'm not acting like a kid" and I can sit here saying "You are". We'd go back and forth all day long, but the fact of the matter is: I knew you were older than me, so it would be pointless in me calling YOU a literal child wouldn't it? Yes. I said you are all acting like kids because in my opinion, you are. You were wrong in claiming that I called you a literal child, and now you're clutching at straws.
Ugh, fool.
I would like you (In your retort which I will obviously be seeing) to show me where I exactly said "Do not call me a child, literally, AC!"
^ Show me that. Show me where I thought you called me a literal child. Or wait . . .
If I didn't say that, could it be that you assumed I thought you were speaking literally because I said I was older than you? It looks like the only one who misread around here was you, and you refuse to accept that fact, AC.
Be the mature one that you claim you are, and apologise. I've flat out proven you to have misread what I said.
Oh, but I didn't. By me posting in defense that I wasn't ACTING like a child is active proof I got what you meant. Are you completely blind to that fact? You sat there and assumed I didn't because I said I was older than you, yet I've been sitting here defending the fact that I wasn't acting like a child.
Wouldn't that mean I read what you meant? That you thought I was acting like a child and wasn't literally one? If you don't catch that, maybe you're misunderstanding entirely, AC.
Loud? Loud text? I've never actually heard of that.
^ Loud = Caps Lock.
Your sarcasm is irrelevant and applies to nothing, AC. You know what I meant.
It doesn't matter what you think of my logic, I think you're acting like a little kid and I said so. Naturally you don't agree, but thankfully my claim doesn't need you to, it's my opinion.
What you think sucks because you have no idea what you're talking about.
If someone bashed your friend and you stood for them while being accused for something that is false and someone came along and called you a child out of the blue, you wouldn't be too happy yourself, AC. Be aware of that.
The fact is, I wasn't wrong. That's an actual fact, and I can prove that. The first time I got banned was because I gave a certain member a compliment, she took it the wrong way, attempted to bash the hell out of me, to which I continually asked for an apology (along with many members and a few mods noticably saying that I wasn't in the wrong, even a mod who doesn't like me) and was banned, with the basher not even receiving a warning, despite committing actual bannable offenses. So no, you are wrong.The second was a mod bumping a thread to tell me to drop an issue that was already dead, so I defended myself, rightfully so, and was banned. Once again I had everyone backing me up, including your buddy.
I was referring to the more recent issue . . .
And the topic was not left for ages when Ushgarak noticed you pulling an Ad Hominem out of nowhere. You randomly insulted that member during the debate and you got in a hissy fit because A mod warned you for starting a fight. You rose the tempo and began to try to correct Ush, who was in the right, and you were banned.
You know nothing, apparantly. I have facts, you don't.
Facts? You use that word loosely.
I'm not asking you to apologise for defending anyone, I'm asking you to apologise for flying off when you misinterpreted my post, which you factually did.
I didn't "fly off", AC. What is wrong with you? You came in here and decided to call everyone childish. You should be apologising for being rude.
If you don't want me to apologise for defending people, why did you call me childish when I was doing so? Hello?!
Whether you agree or not with me saying you acted LIKE a little kid, that's up to you, but I did not claim you were an actual child, since I am well aware that you are not. So in light of this, you have two choices; Admit you were wrong, or display a huge slice of willing ignorance.
I wasn't wrong about anything because that never happened! I never thought you called me an actual child! Hell, I never said that YOU called me a child literally or actually. It's totally flying by you, AC.
The only ignorance I see around here is you being ignorant to the fact that you made an error based on an assumption.
Flaunting? There you go misinterpreting. I spoke fact, people did used to do that. I never once said I valued it, that it was good or that it was just to me, I merely said it happened. You're crumbling.
Heh . . .
If you didn't like the fact that people thought you were older, I'm sure you wouldn't bring it up to your aid.
You crumbled long ago.
I can do exactly as I wish. You don't think you acted like a kid, I don't think I did, so it works both ways doesn't it?
Of course, but the circumstances were different. Know that.
The crux of my point was that in my opinion you were all ACTING like children, I said such and my closing line was implying that. You misread it and I have factually, undeniably clarified it. Denying and continuing to claim otherwise will just make you look ignorant now.
You've said this already and I've replied to it. Read above.
You did.
Read above.