Originally posted by Bardock42
****I just realized how hilarious it is that all those religious people think they will go to heaven.....and when they die...they don't. Haha. Really, that's funny as hell when you think about it.
I know, probably as funny as the people who have near death experiences, or are actualy clinicaly dead for a few minutes, that report seeing either heaven or hell.
Hilarious, just like you claiming that there is nothing after death when you have no way to know that.
Originally posted by Bardock42
****I just realized how hilarious it is that all those religious people think they will go to heaven.....and when they die...they don't. Haha. Really, that's funny as hell when you think about it.
All those suckers wasting their times praying in church. I am busy doing more important things then praying..like taking a shit.
Originally posted by sithsaber408
I know, probably as funny as the people who have near death experiences, or are actualy clinicaly dead for a few minutes, that report seeing either heaven or hell.Hilarious, just like you claiming that there is nothing after death when you have no way to know that.
I can say I railed pam anderson..that doesnt mean it actually happened.
Originally posted by BackFire
Funny - Haha or Funny - Queer?
I find queer things haha...
But it's more funny 'Oh my god, I'm dead' (TM YK'dF)
Think about it, they Think they will go to heaven and be happy and then...bam..they don't..just nothing....I understand they won't notice, but it's just ....funny.
Originally posted by sithsaber408
I know, probably as funny as the people who have near death experiences, or are actualy clinicaly dead for a few minutes, that report seeing either heaven or hell.Hilarious, just like you claiming that there is nothing after death when you have no way to know that.
Why would you trust someone who was near death? Their brains are going crazy during the moments near death, you can't trust their judgement. They know they're dying, and they know the concept of heaven and hell, so their brain starts relaying that information to them, making them think that they're actually there.
Originally posted by sithsaber408
I know, probably as funny as the people who have near death experiences, or are actualy clinicaly dead for a few minutes, that report seeing either heaven or hell.Hilarious, just like you claiming that there is nothing after death when you have no way to know that.
Nah, I'm not that shallow, I also realize how ****ing unfunny it would be when I die and instead of being gone I get lead to the sixth circle of hell and be tortured forever.....well, at the moment the hilariousness still outweighs the scared to shitness.
[edit] I just realized how funny it would be, if that would happen to me, to you...haha...that's quite funny.
Originally posted by sithsaber408
Do you really feel the need to find whatever post I make and attack it?
Good for you little fella, next week you may catch a fish. 🙂
I've certainly found a flip-flopping flounder in you, that's for sure.
Second, welcome to KMC, home of debates. I saw a post I wished to reply to, I did so. Problem? Tell it to someone who will care.
Originally posted by sithsaber408
1.) The people who "just don't need to be here" (rapists, murderers, child molestors) are grown adults making choices that hurt other people, while aborted babies haven't made any choices, nor are they allowed any.
The very fact that you believe a foetus should be allowed a choice, despite its inability to make one, says it all.
Originally posted by sithsaber408
Don't be stupid enough to take my comments on the death penalty, and foolishly try to connect them with my views on abortion, and somehow make a weaker conncetion than Michael Jackson and Lisa Marie Presley.
I didn't foolishly connect them, I made a valid point. You just sat there and decided it was foolish. People see what they want, though, right?
Originally posted by sithsaber408
2.) You prove your stupidity by trying to lump those that don't support killing of babies for selfish sex, or homosexuality that is un-natural, against biology and the "natural selection" that you yourself believe in, with people who rape, molest, or kill.
1) When did selfish sex become a bad thing? Sex is natural, taking care of your human needs is also natural. Doing the two in one is not a bad thing. I know your a Christian, sex is a sin if nor for procreation and such, but you've got to understand that those of us not bound (though you don't appear to be either) by the believe or die rules of Christianity, don't believe that. Abortion is selfishly used as birth control, I disagree with this as you do, but I'm not out to stop it, because the worse evil is lots of babies being born into a world where they are not wanted, or needed, really.
We're not running out.
Originally posted by sithsaber408
2) People like me merely give our opinons and voice our views.
As I'm doing, only mine is called an attack.
Originally posted by sithsaber408
Seems as though its you who is "intolerant." 😬
One of my closest friends is a devoted believer in God, though they also realise that it's their choice to believe in God, and putting laws on people as a result of your religious beliefs is remarkable stupid.
Originally posted by sithsaber408
3.)You are taking the ball and running the wrong way with it like O.J. Simpson in a white Ford Bronco.
He drove the Bronco, he didn't run in it.
Originally posted by sithsaber408
I don't support leaving your spouse for unhappy feelings, or to get a new bed-mate.
So you support being married and suffering unhappiness? It's one or the other. Oh, unless you're one of those who invents positions, such as "Then don't get married if you're not sure it'll last.".
Originally posted by sithsaber408
I believe that married couples are only justified in divorce if there has been adultery, and even then its up to them if they want to try to work it out through counseling.
Why is it up to them? This should be decent, seeing as the Catholic church is against divorce, historically.
Originally posted by sithsaber408
Since most Christians believe that anyway, I'm not focusing on them.We're talking about married non-believers, or boyfriend/girlfriend situations here.
Boyfriend/girlfriend is easier, as another poster mentioned they are not married, have not committed to each other yet, and should just end the relationship if they are going to cheat.
As for the married couples, if they are so fed-up that they can't stand it, or are so sexually attracted to someone else that they will cheat (not just thinking about it), then they should just leave.
In any event, the point is that cheating is wrong, not "Oooh, looky-looky, sithsaber is promoting divorce and sex for all." 👀
You are in a relationship if you have a partner, so cheating is breaking a commitment. Lots of couples spend a great many years together without marrying, there's no reason to believe married couples are more in love than non-married, and therefore cheating is less of a problem.
You are promoting the idea that it's better to get a divorce, you're saying it yourself.
Originally posted by sithsaber408
4.) Am I to take it now that you think I believe in ALL stealing since I said that a poor person who was stealing food for himself or for family isn't wrong? (provided there is not charity/welfare to help them)
I'm referring specifically to that situation, it's understandable, but it's still stealing. You either believe the concept of stealing is wrong or you do not.
Originally posted by sithsaber408
Go jerk yourself off and leave me alone. (stand if front of a mirror or something, a person like you who has such a high opinion of his opinion would probably enjoy that.)
To paraphrase Jack Sparrow; For someone who hates homosexuals, you're well on your way to becoming one, mate.
Originally posted by sithsaber408
5.) You are connecting my belief that lying is wrong and my support for the Bush Administration.... why?
I'm going to assume this is a trick question.
Originally posted by sithsaber408
Just kidding.
I'm psychic.
Originally posted by sithsaber408
While nothing is proved yet, I know that it's safe to say that it appears as though the president lied.
He said there were WMD in Iraq, right? It's been revealed that there was no intelligence to suggest there was, right? Done then.
He did lie, but you still support him. You just ignore the lie.
Originally posted by sithsaber408
My support of the president and me believing that lying is wrong are not a contradiction.
You support a liar and ignore the blatant fact that he lied because to admit it would be to contradict yourself further. So yes, it is.
Originally posted by sithsaber408
I supported Clinton becuase he was my President, my authority, whether I liked him or not, whether he lied or not.
Arguably the worst political logic ever, also a contradiction.
Didn't God give you free will? Yes, you believe he did, right? Why then, are you bound to follow, obey and accept/support a President when you have the choice not to? The free will, so to speak.
Originally posted by sithsaber408
It's still wrong, but it doesn't change my politics.
It does, because if you supported Bush all the way and Kerry won, you'd be supporting someone who has opposing beliefs.
Originally posted by sithsaber408
Now if you have no further drivel to throw around, I've got a few things to do at work, and I'd appreciate it if you'd kindly jump off my d*ck.
It was one reply, stop being so insecure.
-AC
Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
Even if all that were true, which it's not, at least they are going against the grain in their cries for attention. As opposed to being a conspiracy theorist homophobe retard.-AC
I agree, thank god I'm an open-minded Liberal and not some homosexual going through my periods pretender...
Re: Right or Wrong?
Originally posted by badabing
This is just a thread to see where people draw the line between right and wrong. Please don't turn it into a bash fest.Abortion
Death Penalty
Rape
Murder
Incest
Child Molestation
Cheating on a spouse or boyfriend/girlfriend
Homosexuality
Stealing
Lying
You said it shouldn't matter unless they are flaunting it, correct?
Why? What does flaunting it change? Moreover, a gay man could come up to you and attempt to kiss you, it wouldn't mean homosexuality is bad or wrong, it would mean that he's just a disrespectful homosexual, as there are disrespectful heterosexuals.
You make no sense.
-AC
Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
You said it shouldn't matter unless they are flaunting it, correct?Why? What does flaunting it change? Moreover, a gay man could come up to you and attempt to kiss you, it wouldn't mean homosexuality is bad or wrong, it would mean that he's just a disrespectful homosexual, as there are disrespectful heterosexuals.
You make no sense.
-AC
In my opinion that isn't flaunting it, flaunting it is shouting from the rooftops to all who will listen that they are gay, proud and we should all f**k off for being homophobic. Or when they tell you that they are gay then keep asking if it's a problem, and make up like you have been avoiding them or whatever.