Yeah thats what you can look at to get the against government version,if you want the version that supports the official fairy tale version by the government,that it was Bin Laden and Muslims behind it,just go to the library and check out the book the 9-11 commission report.Its the version of the warren commission report which supported the lone gunman theory that oswald was the lone assassian and if you like want to read a book that toots the horn of the government like Case Closed - a book that supports the lone gunman theory that Oswald did it,just check out that book that popular mechanics propagates by the corrupted Senater of Arizona John McCain called Debunking the 9-11 myths.
Captain REX, wrong place. This place is full loonies and they can't give you a fact with it assraped them twice. Try wikipedia, if your paper doesn't allow wikipedia here:
http://americanhistory.about.com/library/fastfacts/blffterrorism1.htm
Scroll down.
Well, prisonplanet is a pretty biased source. Luckily it's not the only one.
websites supporting the official story:
www.lolinfowars.co.nr
www.lolloosechange.co.nr
www.9/11myths.com
as far as I know.
Originally posted by Spartan005
Wow we have to do a research paper for English and I couldn't think of a topic until now! "Idiots who believe that the US government was behind the 9/11 attacks." Perfect!And I did Not have buttsecks!
yeh sorry, you know it all dont you? now go and lick the governments ass you ignorant slave
Intersting webpage http://www.apfn.org/apfn/WTC.htm
Originally posted by DeanoYour name calling is neither funny or clever. Your logic is "lol they say I'm wrong so they must have sex with da government, or follow there every word!!!1", pretty childish if you ask me.
yeh sorry, you know it all dont you? now go and lick the governments ass you ignorant slave
Where's the official explanation for this
By far, the most abundant nonfibrous particles in all samples are gypsum and concrete. Particle size distributions for these components (Figs. 8 and 9) suggest relationships to distance and elevation. Percent frequency is compared to area and maximum diameter, as measured on the SEM. The majority of these nonfibrous particles in each sample have similar particle area distributions with the majority of particles in the range from 0.3 to 3 µm (micron). Sample L18-2, collected adjacent to the WTC site, is characterized by a somewhat higher concentration of particles in the 3 to 300 µm2size range. Particles in samples USGS 4 and 6 fall at slightly higher values of total area, between 1 and 300 µm2, than in the other outdoor samples
http://www.epa.gov/wtc/panel/pdfs/meeker-20041115.pdf#search=
The entire 110 story structure weighed 500,000 tonnes and the plane hit between the 94th and 98th floors according to the FEMA report.
That's around 4545 tonnes per floor, if we take damage from the 90th floor upwards, that amounts to around 99090 tonnes traveling at 10m/s with an arrest in that velocity not long after, before a continuation of the collapse.
, it is not enough to create a "mushroom" effect, as the force is distributed over a wide area and what is being ejected is 30-700 micron particles of concrete. The gravitational energy, of a single tower, would be around 400,000 KWH, in excess of 1,400,000 KWH is required to produce particles of this magnitude.
That's 1,000,000 KWH of energy unaccounted for.
30 micron dust particles, requires over 1,000,000 KWH, that's more energy than available in the collapse of both buildings
The first year of operation of the Goodyear Lake small-scale hydro plant near Oneonta, NY is reported with monthly data for August 1980 through July 1981 on power generated, operating costs, income generated, and maintenance requirements.^Due to the dryest year in living memory in the area with an average flow of 60% of the mean flow for the past 20 years, the plant produced on 3,886,050 kWh versus an estimated 7,500,000 kWh.^Actual operating costs were $89,011 as compared with an estimate of $99,840.^(LCL)
http://www.osti.gov/energycitations/product.biblio.jsp?osti_id=6676571
Originally posted by Deano
yeh sorry, you know it all dont you? now go and lick the governments ass you ignorant slave
Ah, this is THE classic example of a thread on these boards. Deano says something (of course containing the term ignorant and accusing someone of being a slave to the government) and then Mr. Parker coming in with the clutch and fully expect "well said Deano. Will you sign my ass please?"
Parker is a pathetic follower who rarely comes up with his own ideas. Hell, even if he did have them, he would have an immensely difficult time getting his point across as his syntax and grammar are simply awful; you can barely understand his posts.
Originally posted by Black Dalek
It was the Death Star that destroyed WTC, *sigh*
EDIT:The bottom line is this...
-The gravitational energy, of a single tower collapsing, would be around 400,000 KWH.
-To achieve particle sizes of 60 microns, energies of at least 900,000 KWH are required.
-That's more than both towers put together.
-To achieve 30 microns, energies of somewhere between 1,500,000 KWH and 1,800,000 KWH are required.
-The energy of both towers collapsing is around 800,000 KWH.
-That 1,000,000 KWH unaccounted for, at least
Picture of particles from 911.
The majority of particles of concrete were 3 microns...that's from the EPA.