Semptember the 11th

Originally posted by mentalguy
"pull it" is a term fire-fighters use when the fire is too dangerous to have people inside.

actually there is this video out there where someone called up a demolition firm and asked the secretary there if they ever use the term pull it and demolitions and she said yes it was well known there but she didnt know what it meant,she then asked the caller to hold on for a minute and she would check that information for her by asking a demolition expert there what it meant,and he told the caller it meant bringing a building down.This weekend I will post that link for where you can listen to that call.

Originally posted by Katsu
So, what you mean to say is that the death of about 3000 people and a couple of thousand more in the war that followed in Afghanistan do not matter anymore because it was 6 years ago?

Ouch, you do have feelings do you?

I dont like seeing innocent people get killed but i guess im the evil one HEY!

I know its unreal how some people think,sad really that their attitide is-Geez that was 6 years ago why are you still talking about it? so the government murders 3000 of its own citizens and were just like not suppose to care about it at all.okay I see. 🙄 that is why they get away with so many autrocities is because the american people only care about their own little pity problems like paying their bills on time,how their kids are doing in school.ect.even most the people who agree that it was an inside job,their attitide is -that was a long time ago,time to move on.pretty sad but true.

Originally posted by Mr Parker
actually there is this video out there where someone called up a demolition firm and asked the secretary there if they ever use the term pull it and demolitions and she said yes it was well known there but she didnt know what it meant,she then asked the caller to hold on for a minute and she would check that information for her by asking a demolition expert there what it meant,and he told the caller it meant bringing a building down.This weekend I will post that link for where you can listen to that call.

I'd like to here that, because "pull it" in the demolitions industry means to use a vehicle to literaly pull the structure down. That would only be for smaller things that would have a lot of room beside it. If they wanted to take the towers down they would have said "blow it" instead.

I know what he meant when he said "pull it" and its a damn good thing he said it when he did otherwise more people would have been killed. That would have included some of my crewmates.

Dont talk like you know all that shit because I have firsthand experiance with it, and I can tell you that what you were saying is idiotic.

http://www.debunking911.com/pull.htm

Here is sone stuff that shows what I am talking about.

Silverstein Answers WTC Building 7 Charges

http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/january2006/050106silversteinanswers.htm

"We know that the term 'pull it' means to bring the building down by means of explosives because in the same documentary a cleanup worker (in December 2001) refers to the demolition of WTC Building 6 when he says, "...we're getting ready to pull the building six." The term is INDUSTRY JARGON FOR PLANNED DEMOLITION."

AND

Some defenders of the official 9/11 story say that the term "pull" is not demolition lingo for "bring down by controlled demolition". However, the same PBS video in which Silverstein makes his admission, contains the following exchange:

(unidentified construction worker): "Hello? Oh, we're getting ready to pull building six." Luis Mendes, NYC Dept of Design and Construction: "We had to be very careful how we demolished building six. We were worried about the building six coming down and then damaging the slurry walls, so we wanted that particular building to fall within a certain area."

Originally posted by mentalguy
"pull it" is a term fire-fighters use when the fire is too dangerous to have people inside.

Originally posted by mentalguy
I'd like to here that, because "pull it" in the demolitions industry means to use a vehicle to literaly pull the structure down. That would only be for smaller things that would have a lot of room beside it. If they wanted to take the towers down they would have said "blow it" instead.

I know what he meant when he said "pull it" and its a damn good thing he said it when he did otherwise more people would have been killed. That would have included some of my crewmates.

Dont talk like you know all that shit because I have firsthand experiance with it, and I can tell you that what you were saying is idiotic.

Originally posted by mentalguy
http://www.debunking911.com/pull.htm

Here is sone stuff that shows what I am talking about.

Originally posted by lord xyz
That seems like a logical explanation. Give me a reference and you would have proved that video absolutely wrong.

http://www.firefightersforums.com/cgi/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=8;t=001134;p=0

4th and 5th posts down.

Originally posted by Mr Parker
actually there is this video out there where someone called up a demolition firm and asked the secretary there if they ever use the term pull it and demolitions and she said yes it was well known there but she didnt know what it meant,she then asked the caller to hold on for a minute and she would check that information for her by asking a demolition expert there what it meant,and he told the caller it meant bringing a building down.This weekend I will post that link for where you can listen to that call.

so we've proved that "pull it" to a demolition company means to demolish a building...and "pull it" to a firefighter means to withdraw a firefighter team....wasn't silverstein's discussion with a fire chief?

i guess "pull it" means alot of things to alot of people

Originally posted by mentalguy
http://www.debunking911.com/pull.htm

Here is sone stuff that shows what I am talking about.

ah that old pathetic disinformation site.countless numbers of people have debunked and proved that site is full of lies and disinformation many times before in the past.all you got to do is view some of the DVDS out there and they prove how that site is full of lies.

Originally posted by mentalguy
I'd like to here that, because "pull it" in the demolitions industry means to use a vehicle to literaly pull the structure down. That would only be for smaller things that would have a lot of room beside it. If they wanted to take the towers down they would have said "blow it" instead.

I know what he meant when he said "pull it" and its a damn good thing he said it when he did otherwise more people would have been killed. That would have included some of my crewmates.

Dont talk like you know all that shit because I have firsthand experiance with it, and I can tell you that what you were saying is idiotic.

seeing that you use that pathetic debunking 9/11 site shows your clueless on what your talking about.I can refer you to several books out there that prove that site is full of lies but I know from experience from net posters,you wont read them so it would be a waste of time.that site for one,conveintly leaves out facts that the nov 2002 issue of fire engineering magazine called the 9/11 investigation a half baked farce.They leave out those little important details. the videos show those men had prior knowledge that building was coming down.

Originally posted by Mr Parker
seeing that you use that pathetic debunking 9/11 site shows your clueless on what your talking about.I can refer you to several books out there that prove that site is full of lies but I know from experience from net posters,you wont read them so it would be a waste of time.that site for one,conveintly leaves out facts that the nov 2002 issue of fire engineering magazine called the 9/11 investigation a half baked farce.They leave out those little important details. the videos show those men had prior knowledge that building was coming down.

i like how you always mention that you'll refer people to books but never do...then say that people wont read them...when you are by far the most guilty person on this forum for not reading what people present to you

Originally posted by Mr Parker
ah that old pathetic disinformation site.countless numbers of people have debunked and proved that site is full of lies and disinformation many times before in the past.all you got to do is view some of the DVDS out there and they prove how that site is full of lies.

Matter of fact here is the link to that site now.
http://canadawantsthetruth911vidoes.blogspot.com

as you can see from this link under the heading title of 47 VIDEOS DEALING WITH THE COVERUP OF 9/11. here it is.go down to the 35th link there called POPULAR MECHANICS DEBUNKED.click that on and watch the first two minutes of that video,it talks about the pull term on that video.the rest of the 6 minutes is about something else.as you can see from that video,that was a radio show host talking about 9/11 and he called and interviewed the editor of popular mechanics and that guy lied his ass off.as you can hear for yourself,one of the listeners of that show,then called CONTROLLED DEMOLITIONS and as you can hear from yourself,just like i said,that secretary for that company verified it for him that the term PULL IT "IS" used in demolitions. If you listen to the rest of the 6 minutes of that video,its about the highjackers being alive and how he evades the question by the radio host there as well and cant back up anything he says.

also,after you watch that first video,watch the second video.you can hear with your own ears from that video there of the people there that day saying about bld 7-its about to come down and one of them in charge that day,even goes so far as saying -ITS GOING TO BLOW UP.yeah like a bld thats going to collapse due to just fire,someone is going to say-its going to blow up.yeah right. 🙄 they only say that when they have prior knowledge its going to be blown up by explosives.that video you hear the witnesses also saying-we were told get back,were going to bring it down.
the live footage says it all and counters everything that pathetic disinformation site you posted says and what popular mechanics say.

Be a patriot and spread the word to people to view those videos of those links and give them this link I provided to this site.this site has the truth,all those links to those videos are the truth and they counter everything that pathetic link you posted says and proves popular mechanics is a con job full of lies and propaganda.dont be like jaden the disinfo specialist,or lord xyz -both who never view these tapes to this link I have provided jadenmany times but he ignored which proves 9/11 was an inside job and explosives were used to bring down the towers.again this is the site to view if you want to the truth about 9/11.

you asked for it,I gave it to you.maybe its YOU who doesnt know what your talking about? ever consider that?

Originally posted by mentalguy
http://www.firefightersforums.com/cgi/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=8;t=001134;p=0

4th and 5th posts down.

That poster there named Rapt that posted there is the smartest and most intelligent poster on there by leaps and bounds.He knows his stuff and has done his homework. 👆Like he said,,it sure didnt seem like utter lunacy to peter jennings and dan rather and many others who assessed the collapses of all 3 blds that day were the result of controlled demolitions.I have heard the tapes myself of dan rather and peter jennings that day saying that day-this is defenetely the work of controlled demolitions.or something very similiar to that effect.

Originally posted by Mr Parker
Matter of fact here is the link to that site now.
http://canadawantsthetruth911vidoes.blogspot.com

You know what you see when you click on that link?

Blog not found

Sorry, the blog you were looking for does not exist. However, the name canadawantsthetruth911vidoes is available to register!

Parker, your constant endeavours to appear moronic never cease to amaze.

Originally posted by Mr Parker
you asked for it,I gave it to you.maybe its YOU who doesnt know what your talking about? ever consider that?

No...it's definitely you. Most definitely you.

Originally posted by Mr Parker
That poster there named Rapt that posted there is the smartest and most intelligent poster on there by leaps and bounds.He knows his stuff and has done his homework.

As opposed to all the actual fire fighters who know nothing about fighting fires...argh... I say...ARRGGHH!

okay someone just sent me a pm that the link I gave out doesnt work do lets try it again.here goes. http://canadawantsthetruth911videos.blogspot.com

okay here it is.this one works.

Originally posted by Mr Parker
okay someone just sent me a pm that the link I gave out doesnt work do lets try it again.here goes. http://canadawantsthetruth911videos.blogspot.com

okay here it is.this one works.

You can't admit that you're not ignoring my posts...you slay me.
hysterical

That website by no means represents many (if any) Canadians Whatsoever. However, the idiot holding up the picture of Rosie O'Donnell, the Sheens, Willie Nelson and Woody Harrelson as pillars of truth Kills me. As much as I love willie, dudes smoked a little too much loco weed to take politically seriously.

Originally posted by Mr Parker
That poster there named Rapt that posted there is the smartest and most intelligent poster on there by leaps and bounds.He knows his stuff and has done his homework. 👆Like he said,,it sure didnt seem like utter lunacy to peter jennings and dan rather and many others who assessed the collapses of all 3 blds that day were the result of controlled demolitions.I have heard the tapes myself of dan rather and peter jennings that day saying that day-this is defenetely the work of controlled demolitions.or something very similiar to that effect.

Originally posted by mentalguy
http://www.firefightersforums.com/cgi/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=8;t=001134;p=0

4th and 5th posts down.

Originally posted by Mr Parker
That poster there named Rapt that posted there is the smartest and most intelligent poster on there by leaps and bounds.He knows his stuff and has done his homework. 👆Like he said,,it sure didnt seem like utter lunacy to peter jennings and dan rather and many others who assessed the collapses of all 3 blds that day were the result of controlled demolitions.I have heard the tapes myself of dan rather and peter jennings that day saying that day-this is defenetely the work of controlled demolitions.or something very similiar to that effect.

That Rapt guy has been proven to be a fraud. The closest thing to an actual fire he has been to was watching one on TV.

I still refuse to beleve that you are stupid enough to discard firefighter's qoutes on what happened and what can happen when a plane hits a building. I was a firefigher for 2 years before i joined the millitary and I have had experiance with firefighting and I was an on-site EMT during many structural demolitions.

http://www.informationliberation.com/?id=24942

Funny.