I remember reading a issue stating that She-Hulk can lift 75 tons. There was also a issue showing Thing lifting 85 tons awhile back in a FF issue. And in a 90's X-Men book a Sentinel scanned Doc Samson and stated he could lift 25 tons but in Doc's defence he had short hair at the time. And these are all in actuall comics rather than handbooks.
I haven't seen it being stated that the Thing lifting 85 tons as his limit but I do recall it being stated that the Thing was lifting 85 tons however that doesn't mean anything . Even back when Marvel claimed the Thing could lift 5 tons (The Skrulls even referenced that according to their scans the Thing lifted that much.) he was doing shit way beyond that class.
I haven't read enough of Samson to try and dispute that. I haven't seen the She-Hulk thing. At least I don't remember.
Originally posted by snoopdogg
I believe it was stated that She-Thing could lift 85 tons or some sh!t also. And Rogue was shown lifting 50 tons once iirc. Also in a X-Men issue Colossus was stated to lift hundreds of tons.
Well lifting something doesn't really mean shit. I've seen Thor lift a few tons. It doesn't mean anything unless it was stated that this was near a character's limit or something similar.
And the Thing has supported an oil rig.
Originally posted by Rage.Of.OlympusMarvel Two in-one I think. He was having a hard time lifting one of Wonderman's dumbells and I think it was 2 tons.
Do you know whether it was a Fantastic Four issue or a guest appearance in an other comic?I've read most of the Fantastic Four, and I don't remember the incident.
Originally posted by Colossus-Big C
colossus is more durable, he tanked an attack that killed thor and hulk.
I take it you didn't actually read that issue.
I find it asinine how anyone can use that as a durability feat for Colossus. He was dead and decimated like all of the heroes. He just wasn't as decimated as the others because he transformed the instant before the attack. And him being less ravaged is not a durability feat clearly because it was revealed that Reed Richards was less damaged than the other heroes. All of this happened because Doom subconsciously helped it happen on top of everything as I recall. Otherwise it was basically impossible.
Originally posted by Rage.Of.Olympusi read the issue, it is a durability feat, reed is elastic so he wasnt that badly injured, the others were in worst shape then him
I take it you didn't actually read that issue.I find it asinine how anyone can use that as a durability feat for Colossus. He was dead and decimated like all of the heroes. He just wasn't as decimated as the others because he transformed the instant before the attack. And him being less ravaged is not a durability feat clearly because it was revealed that Reed Richards was less damaged than the other heroes. All of this happened because Doom subconsciously helped it happen on top of everything as I recall. Otherwise it was basically impossible.
Originally posted by Colossus-Big C
i read the issue, it is a durability feat, reed is elastic so he wasnt that badly injured, the others were in worst shape then him
Like I said, Reed proved that you don't have to be more durable or anything to survive the blast in a better condition. A different make up physically saved him just like it saved Colossus along with transforming right before it hit.
