Is Jesus a Buddhist?

Started by lord xyz10 pages

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
This was an interesting page I found one night. So I thought I would share it with you.

Is Jesus a Buddhist?

Message sent by Dr. Tin Htut

The following issues may support the view that Jesus is a Buddhist:

1. Jesus had expounded his doctrine of patience, non-violence and compassion which was seemingly an opposite view to that of the God according to the Old Testament. Jesus preached and asked his followers to turn the other cheek when somebody slapped you, whist an eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth in the Mosaic Law clearly denoted retaliation and vengeance which were regarded as justice.

2. In the Revelation of St John, a Christian scripture written down in Greek in the Eastern Mediterranean (v. 1) it refers to a book closely sealed with seven seals. St John weeps bitterly (v. 4) because he sees no one worthy to open the book and to break its seals. This can be done by the Lamb alone, slaughtered in sacrifice (v. 9). There is a similar book in Mahayana Buddhism, The Perfection of Wisdom sealed with seven seals, written in Sanskrit in South India. The book has 8000 lines and in chapters 30 and 31 it describes in detail how Everweeping Bodhisattva slaughtered himself in sacrifice, and how he thereby became worthy of the Perfection of Wisdom. This parallel is remarkable not only for the similarities of the religious logic, but also for the fact that both have seven seals. (1)

3. A parable from the Gospels, the teachings or revelations of Christ, (Matthew 13, 1-23; Mark 4, 1-20; Luke 8, 4-15) has a similarity to that of the Buddha’s teachings. “People hear my words: a farmer goes to sow his fields. The birds come and eat the seeds. Other seed falls on the path. And behold, some seed falls on the rock where there is no earth, and withers away. Some falls under the thorns and cannot grow. The seed that falls on good earth, however, sprouts and brings forth fruit. The farmer is Jesus and the seeds are his words of wisdom. The seeds which are eaten by the birds means people who do not understand the words. The seeds that falls onto the rocks are the words of wisdom that go in one ear and come out of the other. The seeds that land under the thorns means those who hear and see, but do not act accordingly. The seeds which land on the good earth means those that hear the words of wisdom and act accordingly. (2)

4. Jesus life-history between the ages of 13-30 is missing. It is explained that Jesus was attending to his father’s livelihood during that period which seemed to be unlikely. Jesus was a wise and an active child and was given a high place in a temple before that missing-period. Why did he have to be in a low profile at the most active period of one’s lifetime?

5. An account of Jesus’ expedition to Tibet and his subsequent practice of Samatha meditation was described by scholars. He was supposed to have obtained supernatural powers (Jhana and Abhina) and went back to Palestine to teach his skills. (3, 4)

Is Jesus a Bodhisatta?

The following propositions may support the view of Jesus as Bodhisattava (Sanskrit).

1. Theoretically, everyone can become a Bodhisatta if enough effort and determination is present. A bodhisatta does not necessarily have to be a Buddhist in his previous life before his final life as a buddha.

2. Jesus’ commitment to sacrifice his own life in order to save others was a hard evidence for being a bodhisatta.

3. His doctrine may be compatible to that of a bodhisatta and his prediction of his second coming to this world to save people clearly supports the view of a bodhisatta since buddhas have to be humans.

Is Jesus and Metteyya, the next would-be buddha the same person ?

There are reasons to believe this supposition of Jesus as Maitreya (Sanskrit), viz.

1. The second coming of Jesus and the appearance of Metteyya before this world ends is a strong coincidence.

2. Jesus is believed to be in Heaven at present and Metteyya is also in Tushita heaven awaiting for his final life as a buddha.

3. Jesus has a determination to become a saviour which may be of an equal calibre to that of a bodhisatta.

4. The practice of meditation of the next would-be buddha and that of Jesus is extra-ordinarily similar; Metta Bhavana which in essence is loving kindness and compassion to all sentient beings.

The Null Hypothesis or to disprove the hypothesis of Jesus being the next Bodhisatta

In research we usually analyse data to disprove that there is a difference or the hypothesis is untrue. It is called Null hypothesis, like in the law that a person is not guilty until and unless proved to be guilty.

In this context we shall try to prove the Null hypothesis that Jesus and Metteyya are not the same person. If we can find any evidence of Metteyya being predicted as a would-be buddha, was already in Tushita awaiting for his final life as a buddha, and it was proclaimed during the lifetime of Gottama Buddha, then it will serve as a Null hypothesis to our investigation. Jesus was born approximately 500 years after Gottama Buddha and if the former hypothesis that Metteyya was already in Heaven during the time of Gottama Buddha this will nullify the theory.

In search for the evidence

There is an account in the Buddhist texts of an young novice who came forward to accept a spare robe of the two that were offered to the Buddha. The audience was taken aback by the brave behaviour of the novice when the rest of the order of the monks that were present did not come forward. The Buddha told the audience that he was the would-be Metteyya who would become the next buddha one day.

This account comes from the scriptures which are direct words of Gottama Buddha and can be taken for granted as authentic. This evidence will support the view that Mettaya was not already in Tushita at the time of the Buddha. However, it will not support the theory nor will it nullify completely the Null hypothesis that we have put forward. We will need to make further enquiries.

1. When is it known to us that Metteyya is in Tushita ?

2. Who gave that statement and how authentic is it ?

3. How reliable was that person who gave the statement ?

So far, we have not disproved the hypothesis that Jesus and Metteyya are the same. There is a possibility that Jesus is the Metteyya, but there are still sequential questions that we need to resolve. It is traditional for a would-be buddha to come from Tushita which is the last abode for Bodhissatas. But, we do not know from which source did the statement that Metteyya was presently awaiting in Tushita come from. We will need to do further research and will require scholars that can explore the original Pali texts as well as scholars that have wide knowledge about Mahaya Buddhism. The Mahayanists are regarded to be more nearer to Christianity as the two faiths have similarities and developed more or less during the same era and from the locality that had contacts between the two religions. We will leave this as an open discussion and would like to invite scholars to join us in the quest.

REFERENCES

1) BUDDHISM: THE MAHAYANA by Edward Conze. The Hutchinson Encyclopedia of living Faiths, Ed. R.C. Zaehner. Helicon Pub, Oxford OX1 2EP.

2) Jesus’ Tomb in Srinagar by Holger Kersten 1986. GPO Box 961, D-7800 Freiburg, W. Germany.

3) The untold teachings of the Christ by Prof. Goldricke 1925. (Quoted from the Questions and Answers of Buddhism, by Ashin Ariya Dhamma, a Burmese translation)

4) Jesus’ two journeys to India and his demise as Yuz Asaf in Kashmir in the Ikmal-ud-Din by Shaik Al-Sa’id-us-Sadiq. A.D. 962 ca. Translated into German by Max Muller in 1882.

You know what I like about you Shakya, you don't talk bullshit. 🙂 I respect that.

Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
How? You haven't furnished one verse.

Because there isn't verse for either side of the debate. That is my point. There is not support for your view, no matter how badly you would like there to be. I am just stating that there is no statement as to the fact, either way. Yet, for some reason you won't admit that. I view that as pride, and I am trying to aid you in understanding that.

Originally posted by Regret
The term Christ came into existence after Jesus. Your logic against Buddhist states that since Jesus was in the beginning before Buddhist he obviously was not Buddhist. If you apply logic as an argument it has to also support a claim that you make. Your logic did not support your claim. I believe in many ways as you do, I am not attacking your view, I am merely explaining that you cannot argue something and then state that the argument is invalid when applied to your belief. If the argument is invalid when applied to your belief the argument is flawed.

No, here is what I said

The word Buddhism or Buddhist is nowhere in the Bible. Jesus never once mentioned anything about any other religion. Jesus said that He spoke the words of God (His Father) and not even once did He talk about nirvana etc. Besides Jesus pre-existed all Buddhas any way so if Buddhism was the way to attain salvation from sin so that we could go to where God is, then Jesus would have told us. Jesus and a Buddah are day and night different. Jesus is God; Jesus is Creator; Jesus is God in human flesh; Jesus came to save humanity from their sins; Jesus was crucified (He did not practice Buddhist customs); Jesus body was placed in a sepulcher (tomb); Jesus was resurrected by God (Buddhist don't believe in God, right?); Jesus is the only (and I loath and am reluctant to use this term) "religious" figure to ever rise from the dead. I hate to associate Jesus with religion because He and religion are two separate things. Nevertheless, all of the other religious ring-leaders bones are still buried.

Jesus and Buddhism are diametrically opposed.

Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
No, here is what I said

The word Buddhism or Buddhist is nowhere in the Bible. Jesus never once mentioned anything about any other religion. Jesus said that He spoke the words of God (His Father) and not even once did He talk about nirvana etc. Besides Jesus pre-existed all Buddhas any way so if Buddhism was the way to attain salvation from sin so that we could go to where God is, then Jesus would have told us. Jesus and a Buddah are day and night different. Jesus is God; Jesus is Creator; Jesus is God in human flesh; Jesus came to save humanity from their sins; Jesus was crucified (He did not practice Buddhist customs); Jesus body was placed in a sepulcher (tomb); Jesus was resurrected by God (Buddhist don't believe in God, right?); Jesus is the only (and I loath and am reluctant to use this term) "religious" figure to ever rise from the dead. I hate to associate Jesus with religion because He and religion are two separate things. Nevertheless, all of the other religious ring-leaders bones are still buried.

Jesus and Buddhism are diametrically opposed.

Then perhaps I misunderstood what you were stating and apologize if I was offensive. Although I believe the idea that they are night and day is in error.

Originally posted by Regret
Because there isn't verse for either side of the debate. That is my point. There is not support for your view, no matter how badly you would like there to be. I am just stating that there is no statement as to the fact, either way. Yet, for some reason you won't admit that. I view that as pride, and I am trying to aid you in understanding that.

Here are my Scriptures that I believe refute that God used the hypothesis of evolution to create life. You can continue to discount them all you want. But you have yet to provide any Scriptures yourself in support that God used evolution to create life.

Hebrews 11:3
By faith we understand that the worlds were framed by the word of God, so that the things which are seen were not made of things which are visible.

Psalm 33:6
By the word of the LORD the heavens were made, And all the host of them by the breath of His mouth.

Genesis 1:3
Then God said , “Let there be light”; and there was light.

Genesis 1:6
Then God said , “Let there be a firmament in the midst of the waters, and let it divide the waters from the waters.”

Genesis 1:9
Then God said , “Let the waters under the heavens be gathered together into one place, and let the dry land appear”; and it was so.

Genesis 1:11
Then God said , “Let the earth bring forth grass, the herb that yields seed, and the fruit tree that yields fruit according to its kind, whose seed is in itself, on the earth”; and it was so.

Genesis 1:14
Then God said , “Let there be lights in the firmament of the heavens to divide the day from the night; and let them be for signs and seasons, and for days and years;

Genesis 1:20
Then God said , “Let the waters abound with an abundance of living creatures, and let birds fly above the earth across the face of the firmament of the heavens.”

Genesis 1:24
Then God said , “Let the earth bring forth the living creature according to its kind: cattle and creeping thing and beast of the earth, each according to its kind”; and it was so.

God "speaks" things into existence, this is his modus operandi, not the hypothesis of evolution.

I believe that this Scripture refutes the hypothesis of evolution.

Romans 1:20-25
20 For since the creation of the world His invisible attributes are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even His eternal power and Godhead, so that they are without excuse, 21 because, although they knew God, they did not glorify Him as God, nor were thankful, but became futile in their thoughts, and their foolish hearts were darkened. 22 Professing to be wise, they became fools, 23 and changed the glory of the incorruptible God into an image made like corruptible man—and birds and four-footed animals and creeping things. 24 Therefore God also gave them up to uncleanness, in the lusts of their hearts, to dishonor their bodies among themselves, 25 who exchanged the truth of God for the lie, and worshiped and served the creature rather than the Creator, who is blessed forever. Amen.

Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
No, here is what I said

The word Buddhism or Buddhist is nowhere in the Bible. Jesus never once mentioned anything about any other religion. Jesus said that He spoke the words of God (His Father) and not even once did He talk about nirvana etc. Besides Jesus pre-existed all Buddhas any way so if Buddhism was the way to attain salvation from sin so that we could go to where God is, then Jesus would have told us. Jesus and a Buddah are day and night different. Jesus is God; Jesus is Creator; Jesus is God in human flesh; Jesus came to save humanity from their sins; Jesus was crucified (He did not practice Buddhist customs); Jesus body was placed in a sepulcher (tomb); Jesus was resurrected by God (Buddhist don't believe in God, right?); Jesus is the only (and I loath and am reluctant to use this term) "religious" figure to ever rise from the dead. I hate to associate Jesus with religion because He and religion are two separate things. Nevertheless, all of the other religious ring-leaders bones are still buried.

Jesus and Buddhism are diametrically opposed.

Buddha lived 1500 years before Jesus.

Jesus and Buddhism are not diametrically opposed. I should know, I have studied both of them, and you have never studied Buddhism.

You believe that a man is god, I believe that all things are God.

Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
Here are my Scriptures that I believe refute that God used the hypothesis of evolution to create life. You can continue to discount them all you want. But you have yet to provide any Scriptures yourself in support that God used evolution to create life.

[B]Hebrews 11:3
By faith we understand that the worlds were framed by the word of God, so that the things which are seen were not made of things which are visible.

Psalm 33:6
By the word of the LORD the heavens were made, And all the host of them by the breath of His mouth.

Genesis 1:3
Then God said , “Let there be light”; and there was light.

Genesis 1:6
Then God said , “Let there be a firmament in the midst of the waters, and let it divide the waters from the waters.”

Genesis 1:9
Then God said , “Let the waters under the heavens be gathered together into one place, and let the dry land appear”; and it was so.

Genesis 1:11
Then God said , “Let the earth bring forth grass, the herb that yields seed, and the fruit tree that yields fruit according to its kind, whose seed is in itself, on the earth”; and it was so.

Genesis 1:14
Then God said , “Let there be lights in the firmament of the heavens to divide the day from the night; and let them be for signs and seasons, and for days and years;

Genesis 1:20
Then God said , “Let the waters abound with an abundance of living creatures, and let birds fly above the earth across the face of the firmament of the heavens.”

Genesis 1:24
Then God said , “Let the earth bring forth the living creature according to its kind: cattle and creeping thing and beast of the earth, each according to its kind”; and it was so.

I believe that this Scripture refutes the hypothesis of evolution.

Romans 1:20-25
20 For since the creation of the world His invisible attributes are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even His eternal power and Godhead, so that they are without excuse, 21 because, although they knew God, they did not glorify Him as God, nor were thankful, but became futile in their thoughts, and their foolish hearts were darkened. 22 Professing to be wise, they became fools, 23 and changed the glory of the incorruptible God into an image made like corruptible man—and birds and four-footed animals and creeping things. 24 Therefore God also gave them up to uncleanness, in the lusts of their hearts, to dishonor their bodies among themselves, 25 who exchanged the truth of God for the lie, and worshiped and served the creature rather than the Creator, who is blessed forever. Amen.
[/B]

Yes, you believe that, and I can respect that. It is your belief, and that is what it is. I believe you may be right, I do not claim to know one way or the other. I accept though that I may be wrong in my interpretations and so I do not find as threatening the interpretations that disagree. It is important to remain open to truth, we are not perfect, and we will make errors, it is important in my opinion to acknowledge the possibility that we might make errors in our beliefs, especially in regards to unimportant topics such as the method of creation, the exact nature of spirit, exactly what occurs following this life. The Gospel is not about these things, it is about love. Love is the only principle in the Gospel that is stated absolutely, for Christ is Love. You seem unable to be open to the possibility of error on your part, this to me is pride, I hope you can someday overcome this.

John 1:1
In the beginning was the Word [Jesus Christ pre-existed time itself], and the Word was with God [Jesus Christ was with the Father God before time existed], and the Word was God [Jesus Christ is God, God the Son].

But Gautama Buddha on the other hand was just a man. Gautama Buddha was a spiritual teacher in the ancient Indian subcontinent and the historical founder of Buddhism. He is universally recognised by Buddhists as the Supreme Buddha of our age.The time of his birth and death are unclear, most modern books still date his lifetime between 563 BCE and 483 BCE, but more recent research points to a date about a century later than this. By tradition, he was born with the name Siddhârtha Gautama

Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
[b]John 1:1
In the beginning was the Word [Jesus Christ pre-existed time itself], and the Word was with God [Jesus Christ was with the Father God before time existed], and the Word was God [Jesus Christ is God, God the Son].

But Gautama Buddha on the other hand was just a man. Gautama Buddha was a spiritual teacher in the ancient Indian subcontinent and the historical founder of Buddhism. He is universally recognised by Buddhists as the Supreme Buddha of our age.The time of his birth and death are unclear, most modern books still date his lifetime between 563 BCE and 483 BCE, but more recent research points to a date about a century later than this. By tradition, he was born with the name Siddhârtha Gautama [/B]

Thank you for doing some research.

It is your belief that Jesus was before time, but it is not my belief.

Originally posted by Regret
Yes, [b]you believe that, and I can respect that. It is your belief, and that is what it is. I believe you may be right, I do not claim to know one way or the other. I accept though that I may be wrong in my interpretations and so I do not find as threatening the interpretations that disagree. It is important to remain open to truth, we are not perfect, and we will make errors, it is important in my opinion to acknowledge the possibility that we might make errors in our beliefs, especially in regards to unimportant topics such as the method of creation, the exact nature of spirit, exactly what occurs following this life. The Gospel is not about these things, it is about love. Love is the only principle in the Gospel that is stated absolutely, for Christ is Love. You seem unable to be open to the possibility of error on your part, this to me is pride, I hope you can someday overcome this. [/B]

Saying what God says is pride? Not hardly. It is saying something other than what God says that is pride. That is what caused Adam and Eve to sin and fall from glory. They became "open-minded" to a lie, an untruth. That is why I do not lend my ear to certain things. I keep myself grounded in God's Word, which is Truth. That way when the devil comes along saying that there are many paths to God, or Jesus was just a great, moral teacher, or Jesus was a Buddhist, or God may have used evolution to create life, so on and so forth, I go back to the Word to see if that is true. I don't sit there an entertain the lie like Eve did.

God said,

Genesis 2:17
but of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil you shall not eat, for in the day that you eat of it you shall surely die.”

But the devil said,

Genesis 3:4
Then the serpent said to the woman, “You will not surely die.

Eve should have reminded herself what the Word of God was on that matter instead of being "open-minded" because then she started rationalizing and using logic and all of the other things that people do. She should have kept her mind on the Word of God. She didn't have a Bible like we do, but she had the Word of God nonetheless. She had the "spoken" Word of God. But we have the written Word of God. It is all the same. Being open-minded is the devil's gateway into your life. That is his inroad into your mind and heart. But the Word of God says,

Ephesians 4:27
nor give place to the devil.

Don't give satan any attention. Not the person but what the person is saying. If it does not agree with God's Word--don't accept it. Reject it. That is what I have done all along. As a result I have been accused among many other things of being intolerant, a bigot, dogmatic, blind, having no mind of my own, a robot, and so forth. Folks, I will not give the devil a place in my life. I am not going to accept something if it does not agree with God's Word. Call me whatever you wish. If Eve had done the same she would never have sinned. It was Eve who was deceived, not Adam. But Adam was held responsible. I think he ate for a different reason than Eve did. She ate out of deception (the devil managed to deceive) her. But Adam was not deceived. The Bible does not reveal why Adam ate.

1 Timothy 2:14
And Adam was not deceived, but the woman being deceived, fell into transgression .

Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
Saying what God says is pride? Not hardly. It is saying something other than what God says that is pride.

You make statements as to your interpretation of the Word of God, which is a man's interpretation. You then deny the possibility that you, being imperfect man, are wrong. This is pride.

Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
That is what caused Adam and Eve to sin and fall from glory. They became "open-minded" to a lie, an untruth. That is why I do not lend my ear to certain things. I keep myself grounded in God's Word, which is Truth. That way when the devil comes along saying that there are many paths to God, or Jesus was just a great, moral teacher, or Jesus was a Buddhist, or God may have used evolution to create life, so on and so forth, I go back to the Word to see if that is true. I don't sit there an entertain the lie like Eve did.

Being open-minded is the devil's gateway into your life. That is his inroad into your mind and heart.

No, the Bible does not support this idea. Yes, open mindedness can lead a person in the wrong way, if he follows that leading, but it is also Christ's gateway into your life. That is his inroad into your mind and heart.

Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
But the Word of God says,

[B]Ephesians 4:27
nor give place to the devil.

Don't give satan any attention. Not the person but what the person is saying. If it does not agree with God's Word--don't accept it. Reject it. [/B]

I agree. God's Word being the term of import here. You do not test it against God's Word, you test it against your interpretation of God's Word. I have said naught that is in conflict with God's Word, I have made statements that are in conflict with your interpretation of God's Word.

Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
That is what I have done all along.

No, you have only judged what people say by your interpretation of the Word of God, not by the Word of God. The too are not the same, your interpretation is that of a man, and can be in error.

Ezek. 3: 7
7 But the house of Israel will not hearken unto thee; for they will not hearken unto me: for all the house of Israel are impudent and hardhearted.

Hardhearted is the same as not being open minded. It was the sin of the Jews that denied Christ, and it appears that you follow their lead and not Christ's.

Originally posted by Regret
You make statements as to your interpretation of the Word of God, which is a man's interpretation. You then deny the possibility that you, being imperfect man, are wrong. This is pride.

satan got thrown out of Heaven for saying the opposite of what God had said, that is pride.

No, the Bible does not support this idea. Yes, open mindedness can lead a person in the wrong way, if he follows that leading, but it is also Christ's gateway into your life. That is his inroad into your mind and heart.

All people's mind is blinded by satan; therefore, as far as Jesus is concerned it is not open-minded. The blindness has to be dealt with in order for that person to be saved. The Holy Spirit has a part in dealing with this as well as the Father God.

I agree. God's Word being the term of import here. You do not test it against God's Word, you test it against your interpretation of God's Word. I have said naught that is in conflict with God's Word , I have made statements that are in conflict with your interpretation of God's Word.

Here is what you said:

Originally posted by Regret
"Show me Biblical support contradicting the possibility of evolution. There is nothing in the Bible to deny the possibility...it is not inconceivable that evolution was a tool used by God to create. Also, evolutionary theory doesn't contradict the possibility of other methods of creation. It is merely a description of one scientifically valid method for the creation of various forms of life that we are aware of."

Stating that it is not inconceivable that evolution was a tool used by God to create, and that evolutionary theory doesn't contradict the possibility of other methods of creation. It is merely a description of one scientifically valid method for the creation of various forms of life that we are aware of is in stark, flagrant, contradiction to God's Word. Yet you say that, "I have said naught that is in conflict with God's Word." God clearly states how He created life and I have furnished Scriptures to prove it. Yet you have not done so yet, to prove your position. Furthermore, humankind is created in the image and likeness of God. God is not an animal. So for you to say,

"it is not inconceivable that evolution was a tool used by God to create, and that evolutionary theory doesn't contradict the possibility of other methods of creation. It is merely a description of one scientifically valid method for the creation of various forms of life that we are aware of."

This is blatant disregard for the Truths contained in God's Word with regard to what it clearly states as to how God created life. It dishonors God for you to even mention evolution in the same breath in terms of how God created life. Evolution is a lie of the devil to dishonor God and to take credit away from Him as the Creator. I have tirelessly furnished Scriptures to support all that I profess on this forum. But you have not done so.

No, you have only judged what people say by your interpretation of the Word of God, not by the Word of God. The too are not the same, your interpretation is that of a man, and can be in error.

That is true, it is possible for me to be in error. That is why I study the Word and look at a variety of Scriptures on a given subject before coming to a conclusion.

Ezek. 3: 7
7 But the house of Israel will not hearken unto thee; for they will not hearken unto me: for all the house of Israel are impudent and hardhearted.

Hardhearted is the same as not being open minded. It was the sin of the Jews that denied Christ, and it appears that you follow their lead and not Christ's.

Hardhearted is not the same as not being open-minded. Heardhearted is being stubborn to God's will in the face of His revealed will. As far as the Jews I am not in the same plight that they are in. I do believe that Jesus Christ is the Mashiyach (Messiah i.e., Anointed One). I have not denied Christ so don't put me in with them.

edit

Originally posted by Regret
edit

I like the fire.

Originally posted by Regret
edit

I saw what you wrote... (now, you have to sing that with a childish voice to get the full impact). 😆

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
I saw what you wrote... (now, you have to sing that with a childish voice to get the full impact). 😆

😆 lol, yeah, it was one of those leap before you look moments. I decided that it wasn't appropriate for the public area of the forum.

Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
This is blatant disregard for the Truths contained in God's Word with regard to what it clearly states as to how God created life. It dishonors God for you to even mention evolution in the same breath in terms of how God created life. Evolution is a lie of the devil to dishonor God and to take credit away from Him as the Creator. I have tirelessly furnished Scriptures to support all that I profess on this forum. But you have not done so.

Satan seems to provide more evidense for his lies than God seems to provide for his truths. 😉

Originally posted by Mindship
Perhaps a better phrasing is, "Did Jesus demonstrate qualities which, from a Buddhist POV, are like those of a Boddhisatta?"

Pretty much what I was goind to say.

Originally posted by Lord Urizen
Satan seems to provide more evidense for his lies than God seems to provide for his truths. 😉

Of course he does. Satan is the king of this world.

Originally posted by FeceMan
Of course he does. Satan is the king of this world.

Do you have any evidense to back this fairy tale up ?

Originally posted by FeceMan
Pretty much what I was goind to say.

Of course he does. Satan is the king of this world.

Technically satan is the "god" of this age (world).