N00bs Are Taking Over The Otf!!!

Started by smoker413 pages
Originally posted by lord xyz
barker So what's it like on cocaine?

Brilliant at the time, horrible the next day

Originally posted by ILoveMyDaniel
WTF was the point of adding my Captain Jack Sparrow avatar up there? *Raises an eyebrow*

for kicks and giggles 😛

Originally posted by Lana
You did cut it apart to take it out of context, though. He was saying that he wasn't sure if he'd ever had a sock check run on him, and you posted just the bit that said "I'm not sure".

And as I said, we're not in the habit of telling someone when they've had a check run on them, unless it says they are a sock, in which case they're banned.

I posted a part of that article, I did not edit it.

In order to edit something, I would have to change it.

What did I change, exactly?

Originally posted by Naz
"N00bs are taking over the OTF"

They've been taking it over since the start of KMC. Now shut up, n00b.


petpet

Originally posted by §P0oONY
Doing sock checks if fun... (Not on KMC for you fools who think I've been a mod here)
I wouldn't know. I don't sock check on the forum I mod, I just ban people 😈

Originally posted by Lucid Shogun
I posted a part of that article, I did not edit it.

In order to edit something, I would have to change it.

What did I change, exactly?

You changed the context, and you changed the continuation, as though it didn't exist.

Originally posted by §P0oONY
Doing sock checks if fun... (Not on KMC for you fools who think I've been a mod here)
You are a mod, didn't you know?

Originally posted by TheKingofKINGS!
True, but I didn't say that to his comment. I said it in a different context. Meaning you edited the quote's context. Quote editor!

And you did preform a double negitive. Don't try to lie. Regardless of how I spelt something, you also made a mistake, making you look even worse.

It was intended for the purpose of a pun, but I still didn't edit anything. For all I know, you mean't it in that context. Abide, you have no proof that it was in the primary context you claim it was.

Re: Re: N00bs Are Taking Over The Otf!!!

Originally posted by The Pict
You're hardly one of the older members here, however i see your point. There does seem to be more new guys than before.

yeah thats whats hilarious about his logic is he is still pretty much a noob himself. 😆

Originally posted by lord xyz
You are a mod, didn't you know?
How can he be a mod if he a junior member?!? 😂

Originally posted by lord xyz
You are a mod, didn't you know?

Don't think I am now... haven't been on the forums in an age... I'm not even sure if their still running.... *goes to check*

Edit: It appears I still am... Not a lively forum anymore though... 🙁

Originally posted by Lucid Shogun
It was intended for the purpose of a pun, but I still didn't edit anything. For all I know, you mean't it in that context. Abide, you have no proof that it was in the primary context you claim it was.
That rivals the stupidity of Mr. Parker in the 9/11 thread.

Originally posted by Lucid Shogun
I said it on hypothetical grounds, Itzak. Not literal grounds.

Oh well in that case we can all sit back and have a drink or two, now that we know not "everyone" is equal. 😊

Originally posted by Lucid Shogun
I posted a part of that article, I did not edit it.

In order to edit something, I would have to change it.

What did I change, exactly?

You edited the post by deleting the majority of it, thus changing the post.

Originally posted by Lana
You edited the post by deleting the majority of it, thus changing the post.

I did not delete the majority, it still exists upon a differential level. The post was not changed, only a small portion of it was shown once again. This is not editing. Editing would be changing. Nothing was changed, only parts were shown.

Originally posted by Lucid Shogun
I did not delete the majority, it still exists upon a differential level. The post was not changed, only a small portion of it was shown once again. This is not editing. Editing would be changing. Nothing was changed, only parts were shown.
And now you're arguing with a mod. You're on a roll Junior!

Originally posted by Lucid Shogun
I did not delete the majority, it still exists upon a differential level. The post was not changed, only a small portion of it was shown once again. This is not editing. Editing would be changing. Nothing was changed, only parts were shown.

Anything other than showing the full post is editing it, because you are leaving parts out.

And I'd say that quoting three words of a three-line post is cutting out the majority of it.

Originally posted by TheKingofKINGS!
That rivals the stupidity of Mr. Parker in the 9/11 thread.
Yes, the guy hates Clinton, how can you hate Clinton exactly?

Originally posted by TheKingofKINGS!
And now you're argueing with a mod. You're on a roll Junior!

You are allowed to argue with a mod... they're not immortal you know?

Originally posted by §P0oONY
You are allowed to argue with a mod... they're not immortal you know?
I'm aware. I've argued with Dusty. I just figured I'd tell him before he starts bashing, like he does everyone who disagrees with him.