Creation vs Evolution

Hentai = gross.

Back on topic:

"Transitional" fossils are better described as "mosaic" fossils.

Originally posted by Burnt Pancakes
I'm asking you simply because you're the smartest person I know in terms of Science and theory, other then my Integrated Science teacher 😬

slurp slurp

Originally posted by FeceMan
Hentai = gross.

Back on topic:

"Transitional" fossils are better described as "mosaic" fossils.

Seeing as evolution can happen rapidly and that its rather difficult to properly fossilize something and then rediscover it...what the issue?

I was unaware the central pillars of evolution relied on the fossil record.

Originally posted by Bardock42
slurp slurp

Okay then. Can you answer the question I asked him? No?

'tis what I thought.

Originally posted by Alliance
I was unaware the central pillars of evolution relied on the fossil record.

They didn't turn into anything...they shared a relatively recent common ancestor

Originally posted by Alliance
They didn't turn into anything...they shared a relatively recent common ancestor

They seem to think that animals (including humans) somehow jumped from one species to another over night. 🙄

Maybe evolution isn't the whole story..

Originally posted by debbiejo
Maybe evolution isn't the whole story..

What? Like little green men? 😆 😐

No shaky, they're invisible. 🙄 😂

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
They seem to think that animals (including humans) somehow jumped from one species to another over night. 🙄

I doubt Fece does, I think that was just a slip.

But yes, some people think so... the best part is no theory of evolution that I've studied has ever involved such a characteristic.

Joke missed, proceed to next post:

EvoWiki's rebuttals of creationism are ridiculous. They criticized Genesis for allegedly contradicting itself. (I'll take "Basic Biblical Comprehension" for 200.)

Genesis 1 and 2 DO conflict...even St. Augustine wrote on this.

I'm not concerned about EvoWiki.

What exactly is evowiki?

Anyway, developmental biology, molecular genetics, palaeontology... ergo evolution.

Originally posted by Burnt Pancakes
Okay then. Can you answer the question I asked him? No?

'tis what I thought.

Should give me time to answer before you assume that I can't.

But as you probably understand that is all highly theoretical. It's not like we can give sound scientific theories supported by evidence. It is basically speculation. So there are multiple things that could happen if any of those theories is correct...basically, no, no one can answer your question, it is simply guessing.

Where was the question anyway? I couldn't find it.

Originally posted by Alliance
Where was the question anyway? I couldn't find it.

I thought I explained that...each is self contianed within its own universe.

Originally posted by Alliance
I thought I explained that...each is self contianed within its own universe.

But that's just one view. It's not like we actually have a clue about it, now is it?

...as I have said.