Creation vs Evolution

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
Tenuous? I thought Mithlond gave a good response. I think you simple reject anything that does not fit your narrow way of thinking. If I remember right, that is the definition of fool.

Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
Bro, I am just plain biased to believe that God is responsible for life and the origin of the universe including everything therein. I will not even lend my ear to any theories about how we got here. That is all there is to it.

You had a dog Shakymunison and his name was BINGO!

Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
No, our understanding is way more developed than an ant. I simply used the ant as an illustration. What God has permitted us to know about Him is revealed in His holy Word. You must be able to at least read (proof that we are more intellectually advanced and more intelligent than ants) in order to understand the Bible. So, no, our intelligence exceeds that of any insect.

The bible has been changed and translated too many times to be creatable.

Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
No, our understanding is way more developed than an ant. I simply used the ant as an illustration. What God has permitted us to know about Him is revealed in His holy Word. You must be able to at least read (proof that we are more intellectually advanced and more intelligent than ants) in order to understand the Bible. So, no, our intelligence exceeds that of any insect.

Curious, did God write the words or did a human write the words while God spoke?

Originally posted by Robtard
You had a dog Shakymunison and his name was BINGO!

Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
In this thread, page 4, article entitled, "New Definition of Science?"

Issue Date: November/December 2005

By Thomas Heinze

Check out these articles that I posted.

Hmm...just but one of my many responses to evolution. So maybe bingo is Shak's dog's name after all. I have even responded to your questions Robtard so why the attitude. Shall I prove that I have responded to you? It would be no sweat off my nose at all.

Originally posted by Robtard
Curious, did God write the words or did a human write the words while God spoke?

Could you imagine the trouble that the scribe would get into if he screwed up during dictation. 😱

Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
[B]In this thread, page 4, article entitled, "New Definition of Science?"

Issue Date: November/December 2005

By Thomas Heinze

Check out these articles that I posted.

Hmm...just but one of my many responses to evolution. So maybe bingo is Shak's dog's name after all. I have even responded to your questions Robtard so why the attitude. Shall I prove that I have responded to you? It would be no sweat off my nose at all.
[/B]

What are you talking about?

Mithlond gave you a decent example, you dismissed it and called it "tenuous". Shakymunison said that you dismiss anything that does not fit your biased views. I posted your own words saying that you do exactly that. Like I said, this is a debate forum, one cannot debate if you come to the debate with closed mind.

And as far as attitude goes, I actually like you; but not in a male to male up the butt sort of way.

SO why debate with him? Its like talking to a brick wall.

What he believes is right and everyone else is wrong. He is never gonna change, so why try to enlighten him and pull him out of his pit of ignorance?

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
Could you imagine the trouble that the scribe would get into if he screwed up during dictation. 😱

Explains why the bible was written by so many people. And changed by so many...

They were all smote.

Originally posted by fini
SO why debate with him? Its like talking to a brick wall.

What he believes is right and everyone else is wrong. He is never gonna change, so why try to enlighten him and pull him out of his pit of ignorance?

Becuase no person is beyond saving...and he hasn't been banned yet.

(personally, i like having humor at his expense)...(and the occasional exasperation)

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
Tenuous? I thought Mithlond gave a good response. I think you simple reject anything that does not fit your narrow way of thinking. If I remember right, that is the definition of fool.

You and Robtard's bias is why you think every argument against creation is "a good response." Take off your biased lenses, be obective and neutral and then respond to my posts.

You are a fool. Everyone responds to you and you...

A. Put them on ignore like me.

B. Just dismiss their argument.

C. Pretend they didn't respond and then complain about how no one responds to you.

Originally posted by Robtard
What are you talking about?

Mithlond gave you a decent example, you dismissed it and called it "tenuous". Shakymunison said that you dismiss anything that does not fit your biased views. I posted your own words saying that you do exactly that. Like I said, this is a debate forum, one cannot debate if you come to the debate with closed mind.

And as far as attitude goes, I actually like you; but not in a male to male up the butt sort of way.

Question: have "you" personally taken the time to read the above articles? Ah, ha, just the answer I was expecting: the answer is no.

Thes best part is...I'm on ignore...so really...this is just JIA posting 84 posts in a row.

Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
You and Robtard's bias is why you think every argument against creation is "a good response." Take off your biased lenses, be obective and neutral and then respond to my posts.

I'm not bias; I used to be a Baptist. I've been where you are and I know what it is like.

Originally posted by Robtard
...And as far as attitude goes, I actually like you; but not in a male to male up the butt sort of way.

😆

Originally posted by Robtard
What are you talking about?

Mithlond gave you a decent example, you dismissed it and called it "tenuous". Shakymunison said that you dismiss anything that does not fit your biased views. I posted your own words saying that you do exactly that. Like I said, this is a debate forum, one cannot debate if you come to the debate with closed mind.

And as far as attitude goes, I actually like you; but not in a male to male up the butt sort of way.

😆

Though Robtard, you should really push the "up the butt" way...it might scare him off. (or get you on ignore)

Why does every statement of male bonding need to have an anti-homosexual disclaimer?

Originally posted by Robtard
What are you talking about?

Mithlond gave you a decent example, you dismissed it and called it "tenuous". Shakymunison said that you dismiss anything that does not fit your biased views. I posted your own words saying that you do exactly that. Like I said, this is a debate forum, one cannot debate if you come to the debate with closed mind.

And as far as attitude goes, I actually like you; but not in a male to male up the butt sort of way.

You have me rollin' all the time man. Alliance is laughs to but I just can't have a normal conversation with him like I can with the rest of you.

HEY. A converstaion goes two ways...you have to talk to me to have a conversation.

Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
Question: have "you" personally taken the time to read the above articles? Ah, ha, just the answer I was expecting: the answer is no.

You still did not answer this post Robtard.

You don't answer anything.