Originally posted by Mithlond
[QUOTE=7267398
[b]The Male - Female Problem
The simplest and most compelling argument for Creation is the male/female pairing issue.Abstract: If an animal mates with another animal not of its exact species, the result will be a sterile creature (e.g. a horse mating with a donkey produces a sterile mule). If animals of a given species mate and produce an abnormal offspring (i.e. a mutant), it also is sterile. Therefore, how could the macro evolutionary process advance? How could a "mutant" (i.e. advances in form) reproduce? It would first have to be fertile itself. It would have to find a sexually compatible mate who was also fertile during its relatively miniscule life span on the overall evolutionary time scale. Thirdly, their offspring would also have to be fertile and be able to continue the advance. So if single celled animals formed in the primordial soup and they were asexual (not have either male or female characteristics, but reproducing by themselves, how would they advance to a hermaphroditic state (having both male and female sexual organs) and then to the higher orders of animals which almost always have distinct male and female reproductive organs? All in-between states are sterile.
The Details: Evolution can only explain asexual or self-fertilizing hermaphroditic reproduction. Yet we have tens of thousands of the higher orders of species with perfectly matched sexually sets of males and females. And any deviations from a normal union and offspring is sterile (not capable of reproduction). Why? How could evolutionary processes possibly explain what we see all around us today?" [/B]
...Because Evolution doesn't happen over a matter of a few generations. It occurs over millions of years. The evolution is too gradual to be considered mutation. An ape didn't have a baby ape that could suddenly walk - over thousands of generations, the ape went gradually from being a quadruped to biped. This enabled the ape's front legs to be used for other things than walking, so they became hands. Having hands enabled the ape to begin to make tools, to think about things like problem solving. Again this happened over thousands of generations. As the brain developed, so we thought about other things. Like having a debate.
Evidence of recent physical changes to humans is very easy to see. If any of you live in Britain, or have visited Britain, you no doubt would have visited Tudor or earlier houses, built 500 years ago, or about 20 generations (roughly). You may, like me, have to stoop through the doorways in these houses, as humans 500 years ago were several inches shorter than today. We are always changing physically, always 'evolving'. That in itself doesn't prove or disprove evolution, but it does disprove your argument above. [/B][/QUOTE]
http://www.nwcreation.net/young.html
I got to commend you for at least attempting to respond even if your response was tenuous. Anyhoo more evidence for the Bible's explanation about the origin of the universe.