Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
You and Robtard's bias is why you think every argument against creation is "a good response." Take off your biased lenses, be obective and neutral and then respond to my posts.
WTF Chuck? How can you label me or anyone biased when you have said yourself "I am just plain biased to believe that God is responsible for life and the origin of the universe including everything therein."
Don't you think that is a little hypocritical? Even just a smidgen?
Originally posted by Robtard
WTF Chuck? How can you label me or anyone biased when you have said yourself "I am just plain biased to believe that God is responsible for life and the origin of the universe including everything therein."Don't you think that is a little hypocritical? Even just a smidgen?
One huge smidgen...
Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
Question: have "you" personally taken the time to read the above articles? Ah, ha, just the answer I was expecting: the answer is no.
Give me an "H" give me a "Y" give me a "P" give me a "O" give me a "C" give me a "R" give me a "I" give me a "T" give me a "E"... What's that spell?
"I will not even lend my ear to any theories about how we got here. That is all there is to it." One guess on to who is the person who said that JIA?
To answer you, I looked through them. I have read other articles in the past that basically say the same thing, posting proof that evolution is impossible, but they of course are flawed as the laws of science can disprove them with physical evidence.
Repost the link for me and I will read (in essence re-read) what you have to offer if you wish.
Originally posted by Alliance
Though Robtard, you should really push the "up the butt" way...it might scare him off. (or get you on ignore)Why does every statement of male bonding need to have an anti-homosexual disclaimer?
I don't know, gays for a long time have been at the butt (no pun intended) end of male bonding jokes.
Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
You have me rollin' all the time man. Alliance is laughs to but I just can't have a normal conversation with him like I can with the rest of you.
Sure you can, you just haven't tried hard enough I think... Ask yourself, 'What would Jesus do?' if faced with Alliance. Would Jesus put Alliance on ignore or would Jesus try and reach him?
Bro, I am just plain biased to believe that God is responsible for life and the origin of the universe including everything therein. I will not even lend my ear to any theories about how we got here. That is all there is to it.
no-one is saying that you dont believe it....they take exception because you are saying tht God creating the Earth is absolute fact despite the fact that you have no evidence
you put forward and argument that radioactive polonium made holes in solid rock, therefor god must've created the earth
where is the basis for that assumption?
for a start...to prove that God created the earth...you must first prove the existance of God...given that, contrary to your claim, men wrote the bible and not God...then that isn't evidence
and given that there is no documented evidence of any kind for the existance of God...and given that there is no proof of god creating any of the species which exist on the planet at any time during its history
then any claim you have...even for the existence of God, let alone him/her/it creating the earth/universe is completely based on belief rather than evidence
http://www.nwcreation.net/young.html
I got to commend you for at least attempting to respond even if your response was tenuous. Anyhoo more evidence for the Bible's explanation about the origin of the universe. [/B][/QUOTE]
Tenuous. Mmmm. Ironic.
I looked at your link - I have an interest in bizarre theories.
I was going to post a link for evolution evidence, then decided I would just advise you to look on google. Type "evidence for creation" as a quote. 55,100 hits. Type "evidence for evolution" as a quote. 251,000 hits. That's virtually 5 times the number.
My point is, there is more EVIDENCE for evolution than creation. So, for each link you can post, there are 5 other links that say it's rubbish.
Originally posted by Mithlond
http://www.nwcreation.net/young.htmlI got to commend you for at least attempting to respond even if your response was tenuous. Anyhoo more evidence for the Bible's explanation about the origin of the universe.
Tenuous. Mmmm. Ironic.
I looked at your link - I have an interest in bizarre theories.
I was going to post a link for evolution evidence, then decided I would just advise you to look on google. Type "evidence for creation" as a quote. 55,100 hits. Type "evidence for evolution" as a quote. 251,000 hits. That's virtually 5 times the number.
My point is, there is more EVIDENCE for evolution than creation. So, for each link you can post, there are 5 other links that say it's rubbish.
Why didn't you post all of the links to the 55,100 sites? 😱 I think that is what JIA would do. 😆
I don't want to condemn anyone's beliefs - as I've said on this thread, I do not dispute the existence of God in whatever form you believe in him, and I believe Jesus walked on this earth and he spoke a tremendous amount of sense. What I find hard to digest is how anyone can take the Bible as a fax from God when it was compiled in the 4th Century by a man called Bishop Arthansius (or something like that - can't remember off hand) and was heavily politicised in its contruction. It omitted all of the Gnostic teachings including the Gospels of Peter, Mary, etc who were surely all as valid as Matthew, Mark, Luke and John? Furthermore, it has gone through countless translations and interpretations.
So, I am not anti-Christian, anti-religion, etc. BUT, I do think the Christian church was so heavily politicised and - for want of a better phrase - 'corrupted' when it was concepted in the 4th Century that it does not represent the true, COMPLETE, teachings of Christ.
I am very open minded - I believe minds are like Parachutes - but I'm sorry JIA, but the evidence is overwheming in favour of Evolution.
Hey, heres a thought, y'know that the creationists say "If humanists say evolution is right, why do they always try to debunk ID." it's kinda funny that every single one of these threads, have been made by a creationist, either wondering which one is fact (even though it's neither) or someone thinking they're debunking evolution by saying some random crap meaning complexity proves ID. Do I hear the words "Confused hypocrites"?
Originally posted by Alliance
Yes. You are one of his "intelligent 2 women"...who hapen to disagree with him on everyhting of consequence.
Not sure that how that happened. He went from saying Debbiejo is an Antichrist who tests his patience to Debbiejo is one of 2 intelligent women on this site.
I can't wait to see his most intelligent male posters list.