Creation vs Evolution

Started by Shalimar_fox221 pages

i got mad and i wanna say i'm sorry,you all are not like pigs.i just wanna wish the best of luck in live to each of you,even to those of you who use words that were not cuased for.i just hope you all have an wonderful life

Originally posted by Shalimar_fox
i got mad and i wanna say i'm sorry,you all are not like pigs.i just wanna wish the best of luck in live to each of you,even to those of you who use words that were not cuased for.i just hope you all have an wonderful life

Why do we all get angry?

thats not importan .just know that each of you are held dear to my heart

Originally posted by Shalimar_fox
thats not importan .just know that each of you are held dear to my heart

But it is important. It proves evolution. If we lived in a world with a god like in the bible, we would never be angry. We live in a world were other animals can take your life without any justice for you. So we have evolved to defend ourselves. If anyone takes away anything that is ours, and the one thing we own the most is our ego, we will fight them, and stop them. The first step is anger.

Originally posted by ~Flamboyant~
I like his tie.

Yes, it isn't to bad.

So the previous line of posts has just exemplified the creationist stance. A U.S. Gallup poll on views about origin of species found that 80% of respondents questioned thought they were informed about evolution. 50% of the same respondents believe in Creationism, and 40% believe evolution has no evidence.

Basically ignorant arrogant bliss.

Originally posted by Alliance
why is that?

The "Cyclic model theory," that the Universe begins and dies in a endless cycle... It's a possibility right? Maybe it is eternal, who knows?
If I knew the answer, i'd be a rich man... It's beyond my capacity no doubt. It may be beyond mankinds capacity to explain(although we'll keep trying.) If you compare us to the size and scope of the Universe, we're rather trivial. That's why religion/creationism has stuck around so long, it provides an answer; although, it's a really weak one.

The older theory of the universe slowing it's expansion to a halt and then contracting back into singularity, to once again renew itself is less popular these days. Investigation of Type 1a supernovae suggests the universe is actually accelerating, and rather than end in a Big Crunch it will end in a Big Rip. Universal expansion will weaken the fundamental forces to the point that everything is essentially torn apart.

Originally posted by Jim Reaper
The "Cyclic model theory," that the Universe begins and dies in a endless cycle... It's a possibility right? Maybe it is eternal, who knows?
If I knew the answer, i'd be a rich man... It's beyond my capacity no doubt. It may be beyond mankinds capacity to explain(although we'll keep trying.) If you compare us to the size and scope of the Universe, we're rather trivial. That's why religion/creationism has stuck around so long, it provides an answer; although, it's a really weak one.

Its not the answer...its the meaning.

Originally posted by xmarksthespot
Investigation of Type 1a supernovae suggests the universe is actually accelerating, and rather than end in a Big Crunch it will end in a Big Rip. Universal expansion will weaken the fundamental forces to the point that everything is essentially torn apart.

That's the power of destruction at its finest. 😈

Evolution at work in the real world:

http://www.livescience.com/animalworld/061218_cricket_parasites.html

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
Evolution at work in the real world:

http://www.livescience.com/animalworld/061218_cricket_parasites.html

It's like the species has been drugged or something.

Originally posted by lord xyz
It's like the species has been drugged or something.

They are responding in a way that will change them over time. Given enough time (millions of year) they will change to a new species.

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
They are responding in a way that will change them over time. Given enough time (millions of year) they will change to a new species.
Which is what drugs do, I understand it Shakya, I'm just being random because it looks like the creationists are silent.

Originally posted by lord xyz
Which is what drugs do, I understand it Shakya, I'm just being random because it looks like the creationists are silent.

But you are wrong about drugs, and really bumming my high. 😂

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
Evolution at work in the real world:

http://www.livescience.com/animalworld/061218_cricket_parasites.html


I'm going to take a leap of faith and say that this is microevolution rather than macroevolution.

Originally posted by FeceMan
I'm going to take a leap of faith and say that this is micro-evolution rather than macro-evolution.

It does not matter; there is no true separation of micro-evolution & macro-evolution. Evolution maybe expressed in ways that divide it into subgroups, but this is only man's way of categorizing something that is extremely complex. Evolution does not always divide in that way.

Originally posted by FeceMan
I'm going to take a leap of faith and say that this is microevolution rather than macroevolution.
And as the typical person uneducated on evolution, you would of course not understand that macroevolution is not really an accepted part fo the Modern Synthesis.

Adaptation is different than evolution though. I doubt even micro-evolution would occur in this case. I didn't read closely, but this adaptation doesn't seem to really indicate a beginning of evolution.

Thats entirely incorrect on almost every level of analysis.