Creation vs Evolution

Started by lord xyz221 pages

Originally posted by Dreampanther
Creationists believe:

Sixth day: Land animals are created, and God calls them good. Man and woman are created in God's image. They are told to "be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth, and subdue it." Humans and animals are given plants to eat. The totality of creation is described by God as "very good".

So God, according to Creationists (who don't believe in Evolution, I understand - so biology, geology, archeology, chemistry, biology and all othe natural sciences, especially carbon-dating are all wrong, according to them), so God, let me repeat, according to Creationists, created man in one day.

You think He (or She) might have rushed the job, in the case of Creationists?

Well, I was created in 9 months, so it makes sense for them to be created in 1 day.

Originally posted by lord xyz
Well, I was created in 9 months, so it makes sense for them to be created in 1 day.

He he. I am really starting to enjoy your responses - I just wish a Creationist would make a comment - I am feeling a bit feisty tonight. 😈

Originally posted by Dreampanther
He he. I am really starting to enjoy your responses - I just wish a Creationist would make a comment - I am feeling a bit feisty tonight. 😈
They're usually banned though. srug

Oh well - I guess I'll go back to reading my Marilyn Manson autobiography. Let me tell you, though - he is one sick puppy, even for me!

Calling all Creationists - surely you cannot let a mention of Marilyn Manson slip past your-all-judging eyes!

http://www.livescience.com/humanbiology/070223_chimp_split.html

First Humans: Time of Origin Pinned Down
By Robin Lloyd

The lineages of humans and chimpanzees, our closest relatives, diverged from one another about 4.1 million years ago, according to a new estimate that is said to be far more precise than previous ranges for this critical evolutionary moment.

Asger Hobolth of North Carolina State University and his colleagues arrived at the estimate of "the time we became human," or the time in the past when descendents of the human-chimp ancestor split into human and chimp, by statistically comparing DNA from four regions of the human, chimp and gorilla genomes.

The new divergence date is considered fairly recent. Previous estimates, based on fossil evidence, put the most recent common ancestor of humans and chimps on Earth anywhere from 2 million to 10 million years ago.

"Primate evolution is a central topic in biology and much information can be obtained from DNA sequence data," Hobolth said in a prepared statement.

The team also came up with a fairly large estimate for the size of the ancestral population of the primates just before human and chimp species evolved from it—about 65,000 individuals. Other primates would have existed at the time, too, but not all were ancestors of ours.

The divergence date has been a matter of hot debate at least since the publication in 1859 of Charles Darwin's "The Origin of Species."

The new estimate supports claims that recently discovered primate fossils, the Millennium man (Orrorin tugenesis) and Sahelanthropus, are not on the human lineage but belong rather to an ancestral lineage from which both humans and chimps evolved.

Creation VS Evolution....

Why couldn't both be possible at the same time ?

Originally posted by Lord Urizen
Creation VS Evolution....

Why couldn't both be possible at the same time ?

Evolution does not silence Creation, it is Creation that tries to silence Evolution.

Creationism silences evolution.

Evolution does not silence creation.

Creation does not silence evolution.

Originally posted by Alliance
Creationism silences evolution.

Evolution does not silence creation.

Creation does not silence evolution.

I was talking metaphorically. 🙄 I was not talking about the actual Creation or Evolution; I was talking about the advocates.

Then actually address the concepts you are addressing.

Originally posted by Alliance
Then actually address the concepts you are addressing.

I was trying to turn a phrase. I have said my concept plain and simple so many times on this thread that I'm blue in the face. Sometimes I like to get peoples attention with a tricky phase.

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
I was trying to turn a phrase. I have said my concept plain and simple so many times on this thread that I'm blue in the face. Sometimes I like to get peoples attention with a tricky phase.
"God doesn't exist." is tricky enough for the people agianst evolution.

God is a prankster.

He gave us brains and science to test our faith. When we die and get to the Pearly Gates He is going to laugh His silly little ass off and damn us to the eternal fire for not believing the Earth is 12,000 years old and for not believing the Earth was literally created in 7 days.

"But science seemed so plausible!" We will protest. "What about carbon-dating, and geology, and history, and archeology? What about all those dinosaur fossils?"

"Fools!" He will cry out triumphantly. "They were put there to test your faith! Now burn, suckers!"

Originally posted by Dreampanther
God is a prankster.

He gave us brains and science to test our faith. When we die and get to the Pearly Gates He is going to laugh His silly little ass off and damn us to the eternal fire for not believing the Earth is 12,000 years old and for not believing the Earth was literally created in 7 days.

"But science seemed so plausible!" We will protest. "What about carbon-dating, and geology, and history, and archeology? What about all those dinosaur fossils?"

"Fools!" He will cry out triumphantly. "They were put there to test your faith! Now burn, suckers!"

6,000

Originally posted by TRH
6,000
Some also say 8,000, the figure's fiction anyway, why does it matter?

Originally posted by Dreampanther
God is a prankster.

He gave us brains and science to test our faith. When we die and get to the Pearly Gates He is going to laugh His silly little ass off and damn us to the eternal fire for not believing the Earth is 12,000 years old and for not believing the Earth was literally created in 7 days.

"But science seemed so plausible!" We will protest. "What about carbon-dating, and geology, and history, and archeology? What about all those dinosaur fossils?"

"Fools!" He will cry out triumphantly. "They were put there to test your faith! Now burn, suckers!"

So, you believe God lies to us? Either way, the lie exists if the Bible time-line is taken as entirely literal.

Originally posted by lord xyz
Some also say 8,000, the figure's fiction anyway, why does it matter?
Me and god have a big gambleing ring

My thoughts are... Creation happened, but not in the way the bibles say, just as evolution happens but not in the way scientist say, and evolution is the product of creation.

I would love to know how evolution happens, "but not in the way scientist say."

Originally posted by Alliance
I would love to know how evolution happens, "but not in the way scientist say."
Truth is, no one may ever truly know.