The New Official "What do you look like" Thread

Started by Rogue Jedi2,838 pages

Originally posted by Robtard
I feel that this scene correctly captures what we just witnessed:

FF to 2:45
PRHwdOcYQbI&

crylaugh

Originally posted by Syren
Fair enough.

Fair enough.

Good then. Good then.

Originally posted by Bardock42
Personally I don't find that creepy, but I guess some people think there must be a gap in maturity and that it is weird he seems to only go for those younger girls (whether that is a deserved reputation or not).

Well, I wouldn't expect one pedo to point the accusing finger at another.

He's the Bundy to your Gacy, you two should hand out together.

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi

You made your decision, live with it. Move on, I certainly have. And don't tell me you have moved on, the mere fact that you posted what you said proves you haven't.

moving on? what? what subject of conversation are you on?

i was merely correcting dadudeman with FACTS. he was representing his arguments with WRONG information regarding you. i gave him the RIGHT information.

but really? the moving on bit? my response to dadudeman had nothing to be with "moving on" or the lack there of. stop projecting your issues on to me.

Originally posted by Fallen
to my recollection, the last two major relationships he had that stemmed from here were with girls that were CURRENTLY IN HIGH SCHOOL at the time those relationships began.

i think i would know. 😉

My bad. I should clarify that I meant that no physical relationship started until after highschool (not necessarily sex, just meeting...but, apparently, I'm even wrong about that), which is what the Law enforces in most states. 17 is the legal age of consent in Texas so was still acceptable in both situations you mention and both of you were over 18 when things got...steamy. 🙂

But that means one of two things, which contradicts one assumption I had of you:

1. You were held back a year because you were 18 when you met him for the first time.

2. You were put into school late by one year (which is common) because you were 18 when you met him for the first time.

I just took for granted, since you are smart/educated, that you had already graduated before you met him in the fall/winter. John may not realize it, but I can create real facts that were never told to me from facts that were told to me (aggregate information creates a holistic picture using logical connections.) He keeps pretty nill on facts about his past relationships when we shoot the shit...simply out of respect for his exes. It's like pulling teeth with him...but I have my ways of tricking him into telling me more than just the face value of information presented. heh heh heh

Originally posted by dadudemon
My bad. I should clarify that I meant that no physical relationship started until after highschool (not necessarily sex, just meeting...but, apparently, I'm even wrong about that), which is what the Law enforces in most states. 17 is the legal age of consent in Texas so was still acceptable in both situations you mention and both of you were over 18 when things got...steamy. 🙂

But that means one of two things, which contradicts one assumption I had of you:

1. You were held back a year because you were 18 when you met him for the first time.

2. You were put into school late by one year (which is common) because you were 18 when you met him for the first time.

I just took for granted, since you are smart/educated, that you had already graduated before you met him in the fall/winter. John may not realize it, but I can create real facts that were never told to me from facts that were told to me (aggregate information creates a holistic picture using logical connections.) He keeps pretty nill on facts about his past relationships when we shoot the shit...simply out of respect for his exes. It's like pulling teeth with him...but I have my ways of tricking him into telling me more than just the face value of information presented. heh heh heh

odd. you claim to know so much about john (more than anyone, even me), but you don't even know the basic information. hmmm. interesting.

Can we pleeeeease just go back to posting pictures of white women? I'm really not interested even a little bit in RJ's history of seducing high school girls and leaving them bitter and bitchy. That's really really not the topic of this thread like at all.

Originally posted by RE: Blaxican
Can we pleeeeease just go back to posting pictures of white women? I'm really not interested even a little bit in RJ's history of seducing high school girls and leaving them bitter and bitchy. That's really really not the topic of this thread like at all.

http://www.google.com/imghp?hl=en&tab=wi

Google is not the topic of this thread!

edit- also, link doesn't work properly. Well, it's not doing what I think you meant for it to do. Nevermind.

Originally posted by Fallen
odd. you claim to know so much about john (more than anyone, even me), but you don't even know the basic information. hmmm. interesting.

That comment completely side-stepped all information I presented. I did not see that coming.

lol...just kidding. That was definitely the type of reply I expected from you. 😊

Would you like to remain more anonymous?: I can drop this conversation completely if you do. I figured you wanted to be more open since you corrected a thought I had with some very specific information. If this is not the case, definitely say so because I'm all about privacy for those who want it.

Originally posted by RE: Blaxican
Google is not the topic of this thread!

What I posted was google image search. Helping a brother out in perving over our women.

[edit] Well, works fine for me, I guess I'll keep them.

I'd much prefer if they could just stfu and post the pictures themselves. Thanks though my honorary brother.

Originally posted by RE: Blaxican
I'd much prefer if they could just stfu and post the pictures themselves. Thanks though my honorary brother.

And the world must bend to your will.

No. Only females. AS YOU KNOW.

Originally posted by RE: Blaxican
No. Only females. AS YOU KNOW.

You should post a pic.

Do it!

I AM NOT A WHITE WOMAN!

Originally posted by dadudemon
But the women we're talking about were not in highschool. That's not the same thing. That dude in the video was talking about freshmen highschool girls: 14-15 years old.

If we were talking about you and Sarah, this would apply. And, no, I'm not joking. No one thinks you're a creeper like they do RJ. (BTW, I do not think you're a creeper for liking a 14 year old girl when you wer 19/20. That' perfectly within "natural" attraction especially if Sarah developed into a women earlier than most.)

You probably shouldn't, on KMC, at least: it could get you banned/in trouble. That's why I told RJ that it's good he edited his post: he would have gotten in trouble.

Also...you English people and your English spellings. schmoll

Man, what the hell happened when I left?

...And can I still at least be creepy?

Originally posted by RE: Blaxican
I AM NOT A WHITE WOMAN!

How would we know if you refuse to post a pic?

Originally posted by dadudemon
That comment completely side-stepped all information I presented. I did not see that coming.

lol...just kidding. That was definitely the type of reply I expected from you. 😊

Would you like to remain more anonymous?: I can drop this conversation completely if you do. I figured you wanted to be more open since you corrected a thought I had with some very specific information. If this is not the case, definitely say so because I'm all about privacy for those who want it.

everything that i corrected you on is PUBLIC knowledge. anyone who even knew me or john KNEW i was in high school.

its ALSO public knowledge that DA was in high school. she posted things about her school dances and graduation. you knew RJ at this time. how do you not know this?

Originally posted by Bardock42
How would we know if you refuse to post a pic?
I knew you closed your eyes when we had sex. You ****.