Originally posted by SmasandianKobe played at the level of an "alpha dog". Shaq played better in the Finals consistently, but it was Kobe who shined against much of the tougher competition Western Conference. Not trying to say he was the best player on the team but to discredit his rings(I've seen it done) is childish.
Saying that Kobe rings with Shaq are less meaningful than his rings he earned as the alpha dog is not a childish argument.
Originally posted by Darth Martin
Kobe played at the level of an "alpha dog". Shaq played better in the Finals consistently, but it was Kobe who shined against much of the tougher competition Western Conference. Not trying to say he was the best player on the team but to discredit his rings(I've seen it done) is childish.
Sure.