Originally posted by nvrbeenwthagirl
I think ur missing the whole basis of my point. Stop looking for something to go against and just read what i'm saying. I'm saying that Someone said Superman had more strength feats and better ones than diana therefor he is way stronger. I replied that Cap Marvel and Doomsday dont' have that many strength feats either. so why are they considered equal to superman and doomsday is stronger yet they dont' have any feats?
And. Who. is. saying. otherwise? Its the third time ive said this just today. Doomsday has no worthy feats of pure strength but hes conidered stronger than SM in some incarnations because (read it) he beat him physically.
So what is it? We cant just look at strength feats to determine who is in whos level of strenght. We have to look at the matches.
(wer talking of strength only here, get it?)
If i consider WW a top tier its because despise having pratically no solo feats of worth compared with SM, or Hulk etc she does good against top tiers. Therefore shes top tier.
Ditto for Captain Marvel.
The difference between Marvel and WW is just one. Physically speaking (strength, not overall power) she has more troubles with SM than CM. She usually switches the slug to the skill type or the weapon type. CM usually (not meaning he wont resort to lighting, but usually) doesnt switch the match for those. He keeps it strenght based, for most of it.
And also because he backs up more in order to not want to hurt the guy. Diana goes more for the kill, for a lack of a better word.
And Diana post crisis doesnt amp her strength, ok? Who started this rumor?