Originally posted by Marchello
*["Actually that is about as far from the truth as possible. The earth has been around for billions of years. All geological/geographical/physical evidence supports this.The is no proof it has only existed for a Biblical 5000 year or whatever. Especially as there is archaeological evidence of things like Aboriginals in Australia for 20,000 years.
The only place that claim the earth existed for a shorter period is... well, books written in periods where they lacked the scientific knowledge to know better. Like the Bible. That, I am afraid to say, is not a volume of evidence."]
***All you present are conjectures, speculations, and denials...NONE of which are supported by ANY proof whatsoever.
Marchello
Yes, because I know the claims of a publicly debunked figure whose theories are largely based upon scientific misunderstandings are more valid then archaeological and anthropological finds that show the Aboriginals have been in Australia that long at least - you know, they find bones and camp sites and shell mounds which all support that dating.
Are you implying that all the experts have been completely and consistently wrong to the figure of 20,000 years when it comes to Aboriginals? Care to explain how such a consistent mistake was made over the years? And how no evidence has arisin that comes close to debunking it? Other then the likes of what you pasted "It can't be true because it can't be."
As it is, even the most conservative date has them there for a period of 7,000 years, and that figure is viewed as outdated due to discoveries and research done over the past two decades.
Originally posted by Marchello
***All you present are the rantings of a ignorant man (with an empty head)...speculations, conjectures, and denials...but NO PROOF of anything.Marchello
Heheheh. The irony here is quite sweet.
As I asked: "Which secret base did you sneak into in order to discover the "secret age of the earth."
Likewise - archaeological proof of cultures and humans older then "6,000" years.
And since 6,000 years is your figure that would mean the Egyptians and Sumerian's and the rest were having to deal with... gasp... dinosaurs! Care to explain why these cultures make no reference to them? I mean they are happy to list every other type of beast in tomb art and the like -why no dinosaurs? And the rate of extinction would be impossible.
And why does the geological science show that all the lands were once joined? And that the shifting of the tectonic plates needed to put them were they are now would have had to taken more then 6,000?
Yes, I could go on, Mr. "I support a chap who has been comprehensively debunked" but I wont. I fear it is you coming of as the ignorant one - though to be fare you aren't ranting (since that would imply using your own words as opposed to cut & paste jobs)