Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
I hate evil ad infinitum.
However, your dogmatic views on the subject lead to a descisive perspective on it. Good and evil are defined ony by your frame of reference, which are based soley on your religion. You fail in your attempts because you recuse all others from validity. And if your attempts are not defined by your intentions, then you must believe that there are far too many intentions that apply to your idea of professing your own faith.
Originally posted by Devil King
However, your dogmatic views on the subject lead to a descisive perspective on it. Good and evil are defined ony by your frame of reference, which are based soley on your religion. You fail in your attempts because you recuse all others from validity. And if your attempts are not defined by your intentions, then you must believe that there are far too many intentions that apply to your idea of professing your own faith.
Do you understand what you just said? That was so deep that it went right over my head. In laymen terms, what are you trying to say?
Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
That was not the point.The point is that you do not have to [b]experience
pain, bad, evil, or sin (all one and the same somewhat) in order to know what pain, bad, evil, or sin is. [/B]
Pain is not evil. Bad is not evil, even if evil can be bad. Sin depends on what religion you are.
You seem to not know what evil is.
Evil is a path that people take in their life.
Originally posted by Shakyamunison
Pain is not evil. Bad is not evil, even if evil can be bad. Sin depends on what religion you are.You seem to not know what evil is.
Evil is a path that people take in their life.
Pain is evil. Bad is evil. Sin is painful, evil, and bad. Evil is sin and sin is evil plus bad. Evil is a principle that is adopted, embraced, committed, or shunned.
Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
Do you understand what you just said? That was so deep that it went right over my head. In laymen terms, what are you trying to say?
Good and Evil, in your opinion and preaching, are based only on your religion. The Bible is valid because it's the bible...that's all the actual justification you require. If your attempt to convert is not based on your own self-interest, then they must be based on concern for the soul of others. If so, then that concern is limited by your intention to preach at them based on the requirements of your religion.
Originally posted by Devil King
Good and Evil, in your opinion and preaching, are based only on your religion. The Bible is valid [b]because it's the bible...that's all the actual justification you require. If your attempt to convert is not based on your own self-interest, then they must be based on concern for the soul of others. If so, then that concern is limited by your intention to preach at them based on the requirements of your religion. [/B]
Are you a philosopher?
Really folks, I really don't have a religion, but a relationship with God through Jesus Christ.
Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
Pain is evil. Bad is evil. Sin is painful, evil, and bad. Evil is sin and sin is evil plus bad. Evil is a principle that is adopted, embraced, committed, or shunned.
😆 Pain is not evil. Pain is good, like a fire alarm is good. The rest of what you said was nonsense to me.
Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
Society would say so, but I do not. Jesus did not call it that.
then why do you use social methods for justifying it to others; ie scripture, websites, etc? Jesus is an interesting person, no doubt. As soon as you limit your preaching to his words only, you may be on to something.