Originally posted by sithsaber408
Again, what are your thoughts then on the effect of children seeing nudity?
its too vague of a question.
does this turn you on?
or this?
get your kleenex ready:
and for the ladies to get hot and bothered over undersized genetalia:
oh damn, im posting porn!!! better report me before the kmc teen-abortion rate skyrockets!
Originally posted by Lana
This is reminding me of an argument that occured in the artwork forum a couple years ago, where someone was convinced that ALL nudity was pornographic.
Well obviously it is, cause nudity makes children have sex, and lack of education makes children stay away from sex. Every smart person knows that....
Originally posted by Fishy
Well obviously it is, cause nudity makes children have sex, and lack of education makes children stay away from sex. Every smart person knows that....
yes, you are correct. sex is not instinctive. if a kid never knows what genetalia is used for they will never have the urge to use it. like when we all had to read the "how to whack off" manual before we knew what to do.
Originally posted by PVS
yes, you are correct. sex is not instinctive. if a kid never knows what genetalia is used for they will never have the urge to use it. like when we all had to read the "how to whack off" manual before we knew what to do.
So, now I'm just wondering is someone's going to try and say that seeing artistic nudes in a museum can turn a kid gay.
Originally posted by sithsaber408
Well, that was all very informative.You have all proved Lana wrong, she can still have hope in humanity.
Plenty of people think kids and nudity is O.K.! 👆
Have you even read the post I posted on the second page, shouldn't be to hard to find all the way at the bottom. Second to last post or something I think, read it...
It actually shows Lana is right, although i'm sure you will probably just ignore that and any other scientifical data that comes your way because it doesn't really help your case.
Originally posted by PVS
awww, is it time to ignore the fact that you're little speech was proven logically false? baby
Originally posted by Fishy
Have you even read the post I posted on the second page, shouldn't be to hard to find all the way at the bottom. Second to last post or something I think, read it...It actually shows Lana is right, although i'm sure you will probably just ignore that and any other scientifical data that comes your way because it doesn't really help your case.
You two are amazing.
Scientific facts?
What, that our country should be more like the netherlands?
Allow drug use and prostitution, lower our standards enough that people are so numbed by crap that they don't let themselves pull it any more?
How bout no, Scott.
As for PVS, you got me.
Kids+nudity=not thinking about sex, not having sex, no teen pregnancy or abortions.
My logic of kids shouldn't be exposed to nudity was WAY off-base.
Seriously, have any of you ever pulled your heads out of your liberal asses long enough to realize that people were living with a much different mind-set only 50 years ago, and they were living much better lives?
But I guess all that matters is the free-expression that we have created in the last part of the 20th century, in our superiority over the inferior generations of the past, with their restricting morals, low crime, low teen pregnancy, and prosperity.
I'll leave you to your laptops and your Starbucks now, I'm glad you've made the world so much "better" for everybody.
How were people living better lives 50 years ago? That’s right, women were second class citizens, and racism was still OK and so on. People were just as screwed up then as they are now the only difference is that with the information age more people know about what has been going on and we can share it more freely.