Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
So then explain to me why Ushgarak invariably interposes himself between me and another forum member but in favor of the other poster and never me? I mean off top he has come to Alliance's aid, yours, and Shakes.Me: 0
Others: 3You do the math. Your right moderators don't have to be unbiased and impartial, but it would be nice. Hey, I don't have to brush my teeth either, but it would be nice. If I was a moderator I would just instinctively know that I should--not that I must--but should show some equal treatment, just because. I treat all members the same, I don't have any favorites, but I think Ushgarak does. Hmmm...I wonder who they are?
The maths is very simple- the reason is, it is because you keep making absurd and silly posts that invite my intervention. The common link is your inability in that area.
You are also completely wrong about mods being neutral in debates. That is not in any way desirable. Outside enforcing the rules, it is right and proper that mods be as opinionated as the rest of the posters, else they could not take part in debates. I DO treat members all the same. When I see stupidity being displayed in an argument, I am inclined to come in. Also when I see a possible mistake being made. You just happen to do this a ot more than everyone else.
But if you want a literal refutation of your idea that I always come in against you because I am biased against you- what about the Tactitus thing, hmm?
And I am sorry, but you ARE evasive. You demonstrate that on just about every argument you get called out on. This issue about 'admitting' is one of them. JFK did not admit anything, he stated a belief. All the other stuff you try and make out is irrelevant is in fact VERY relevant. People have been attempting to work out what your argument is, the point of what you are saying is. You are avoiding that. It is evasive and cowardly and once more reflects badly upon you.