Originally posted by Deadline
I know but my point is based on how he debates we can pretty much assume that he probably took events out of context, or hes lowballing. Hell look at his underwater argument, guy gets away with murder.
proving my point that you don't debate topics but you go after people, cant you grow up?
anyways you have yet to prove he was wrong, and you take everything far to literally. What did he low ball? or took out of context in this thread?
Originally posted by King Castle
obviously he does otherwise he be arguing just to argue.what be the point of defending and backing up midnighter.
Nope I've just seen his respect thread. I was going to actually state that it maybe a little hard to say who wins cos MN comes from another universe so you may have trouble making comparisons. However my beef yet again is with certain posters making assumptions and not analsying their own arguments the way they analyse others.
However based on what I've seen MN wins.
Originally posted by Deadline
Nope I've just seen his respect thread. I was going to actually state that it maybe a little hard to say who wins cos MN comes from another universe so you may have trouble making comparisons. However my beef yet again is with certain posters making assumptions and not analsying their own arguments the way they analyse others.However based on what I've seen MN wins.
Originally posted by Dum Dum Dugan
he was being sarcastic, and making fun of you
Dunno about that.
Originally posted by srankmissingnin
I also know who the characters where, their powers and their previous history with the Mercs, unlike you who is just being contrary as usual.
My point is based on what I know about you it means nothing. You always interpret things the way you want to see them.
Originally posted by Deadline
Hell look at his underwater argument, guy gets away with murder.
You mean that other thing I am right about?
Water is 800 times denser than water. It would 800 times the power to accomplish that feat under water as it would on land. I have facts and science behind my statement... you don't. You are just being contrary again because you get off on it.
Originally posted by Dum Dum Dugan
No, that is what he doing, he making fun of you for talking out your ass.
Nope hes serious. See what I mean about backing up everything he says?
Originally posted by srankmissingnin
You mean that other thing I am right about?Water is 800 times denser than water. It would 800 times the power to accomplish that feat under water as it would on land. I have facts and science behind my statement... you don't. You are just being contrary again because you get off on it.
Bruv I can see a normal human being ble to push another person at least 1 ft through water using both their arms or both there legs. I can't say for sure because im not underwater if this is true you're argument is nonsense.
Originally posted by Starscream M
whatever. you're just starting shit but can't back it up. 🙄
Originally posted by Dum Dum Duganyou can't accuse someone of having a vendetta and then refuse to elaborate what they have a vendetta against...that's simply irresponsible 😬
can't back what up? If you really are to slow on the upkeep I not gunna waste my time telling you. Honestly I do that enough with debates, but with this I have zero obligation to explain why I say he on a vendetta, though it obvious to anyone with have a brain.
Originally posted by Dum Dum Dugan
No he not, do i really need to PM him and have him explain that he was poking fun at you and your arguement?Me and him were just talking about how much of a tool you are over pm's.
Of course you would you guys think you're right about everything. 😬
Anyway this is getting out of hand.
Originally posted by Deadline
My point is based on what I know about you it means nothing. You always interpret things the way you want to see them.
No, I analyze facts and use deductive reasoning, unlike you who makes huge leaps of logic to support your opinion with very little in terms of concrete evidence. So while you say "Blade was shot, he must have a healing factor!" I say "Blade's never been shown to heal on panel and that evidence you brought up similarly exists for other characters who are established as not having healing factors. It isn't conclusive." See the difference? I could make an arguement that Wolverine is a telepath with empathic abilities with more credibility than the Blade has a healing factor arguement.