ANIME Fighters VS AMERICAN Superheros

Started by dvampire173 pages

Originally posted by carver9
Oh, you're talking about the blast that was>>>>>> a planet destroying blast.

Now if you want another example of just a planet destroying blast, look at the 1st blast kid buu shot and vegeta redirected it or how about the vegeta vs goku fight (there 1st fight), goku stopped a planet destroying blast then.

Planet destroying blast aint nothing to goku or krillin for the matter. 😕

Then why do they deflect them? And when has it ever been stated that Krillin could destroy a planet?

Originally posted by StyleTime
There is no logical reason why he would not blow up the planet to kill Frieza if his life was threatened....which it was.

Blowing up the planet would not kill Freeza, it didn't kill Freeza when he was just a half dead torso. Freeza wasn't worried much at all about being on Namek during its explosion. I didn't read the rest of that, too tired to read that much right now, but nobody mentions lack of big environment damage to discredit what happens in comics, its just dbz that people try to do that with. Vegeta was a planet buster before namek ends, to say he wasn't during the Buu saga is just not reasonable.

Originally posted by dvampire
Then why do they deflect them? And when has it ever been stated that Krillin could destroy a planet?

Same reason anybody dodges anything, pain. Vegeta took the kameha that overpowered him to the face. and when they do get hit by it then you say it wasn't planet busting anyway.

Originally posted by TheBadguy
Blowing up the planet would not kill Freeza, it didn't kill Freeza when he was just a half dead torso. Freeza wasn't worried much at all about being on Namek during its explosion. I didn't read the rest of that, too tired to read that much right now, but nobody mentions lack of big environment damage to discredit what happens in comics, its just dbz that people try to do that with. Vegeta was a planet buster before namek ends, to say he wasn't during the Buu saga is just not reasonable.

Same reason anybody dodges anything, pain. Vegeta took the kameha that overpowered him to the face. and when they get hit by it then you say it wasn't planet busting anyway.

Vegeta has been a planet buster since he learned the Galic Gun so he should still be at Buu saga, but being a sun or solar system destroyer is just weird IMO.

Originally posted by Wei Phoenix
Vegeta has been a planet buster since he learned the Galic Gun so he should still be at Buu saga, but being a sun or solar system destroyer is just weird IMO.

Yeah I was being generous to the people that try and say he was lying about his Galic Gun. To me if it happened in the manga and Goku or Vegeta needed to take out a sun then I don't doubt the sun would be taken out. As far as the Solar System, it depends on if you believe Cell or think he was lying. I can understand people not believing either of these, but to argue Vegeta wasn't a planet buster in the Buu saga is just crazy.

Originally posted by TheBadguy
Blowing up the planet would not kill Freeza, it didn't kill Freeza when he was just a half dead torso. Freeza wasn't worried much at all about being on Namek during its explosion. I didn't read the rest of that, too tired to read that much right now, but nobody mentions lack of big environment damage to discredit what happens in comics, its just dbz that people try to do that with. Vegeta was a planet buster before namek ends, to say he wasn't during the Buu saga is just not reasonable.

I may have been a bit unclear. Vegeta wanted to kill t Frieza and knew he'd need all his power to do so. Even if destroying the planet would not destroy Frieza, Vegeta did not have this knowledge. There's no reason he wouldn't have attempted to do it to try and kill Frieza since his other efforts were obviously in vain. I did not intend to comment on Frieza's durability. I hope that clears it up.

As for the comics thing, I and many others will admit when environmental damage should occur in comics. So far I haven't brought up something that was unreasonable in a comic. In fact, I just used a scan of a comic where collateral damage happened as it should. I'm not sure of what specific instances you refer to, but I'm sure comic fans would happily discuss the issue with you. In all honesty, the hyperbole used by dbz arguments seems far, far worse considering we generally don't allow the same hyperbole for comics. If we did, Cyclops would be a planet buster.

Can Edward Elric beat Doctor Strange?

Originally posted by Nemesis X
Can Edward Elric beat Doctor Strange?

No.

Originally posted by StyleTime
I'll address your two reasons for Vegeta's reluctance to destroy Namek before I proceed to my main point. Firstly, since you want to accept Arlia as being something more than filler, I guess I'll go ahead and use it. Vegeta clearly stands outside his spaceship when he fires his blast at Arlia. Saying he can't survive is rediculous as he already did. Heck, he even spoke while he was in space. Either you disregard Arlia and admit that the feat Vegeta gains here is rediculous, or you must accept that he breathes in space and would not refrain from destroying a planet because of it. Secondly, the dragon balls would be useless to Vegeta if he is dead. There is no logical reason why he would not blow up the planet to kill Frieza if his life was threatened....which it was.

I don't recall actually saying I accepted Arlia as canon- sure, I brought it up, but that was only in response to your saying that Vegeta wasn't portrayed as planet-destroying. All the specifics of Arlia are worthless, it's only the general intent that's approximately in line with the actual canon.
Originally posted by StyleTime

As for my main point here, I brought that up in my last post to show how Vegeta is virtually always displayed at less than planet busting. Even if he didn't destroy the planet, the guy should have done far more collateral damage than he did. Again, these are life and death situations. Vegeta has no reason to hold back. If I may illustrate my meaning, I ask that you look at this Silver Surfer vs Morg picture. In it, Surfer and Morg destroy a planet as a side effect of their battle.

Was Surfer's goal to destroy the planet? No, but he couldn't help it. This isn't about Silver Surfer of course, but I am trying to illustrate a point. If you have even near planet destroying power and have to use it to defeat your foe, the planet will be destroyed or severely damaged whether you want it to or not. Even if Vegeta was holding back for whatever convenient reason you wish to offer him, he should still at least wreak some large scale havok in any of the situations I've mentioned. Why didn't he? He can't destroy the planet.


I disagree- all the Z fighters, but Vegeta in particular (Final Flash) are shown as having extraordinary control over their energy and bodies. Energy that goes into creating an enormous crater is energy that doesn't go into damaging your opponent, after all. So Surfer can't control attacks that precisely- I'm not surprised, he's not a martial artist. So it's not that Vegeta's holding back- on the contrary, he's focusing as much of his energy as possible on his opponent.
Originally posted by StyleTime

This would be fine, but again Arlia works against you here. Vegeta charged his planet busting attacking in less than two seconds. Time would most certainly not factor into his decision.


See above. This sort of inconsistency is exactly why Arlia would never be accepted as canon.
Originally posted by StyleTime

It is surprising actually. Again, the Arlia blast was like...2 seconds. There's not much difference between ki blasts other than the screaming of a name beforehand.


Again, see above. Further, how do you know he wasn't charging the Arlia blast in the ship?
Originally posted by StyleTime

I don't think he is that stupid either. Which is why self-destructed. He knew he could not blow up the planet. There is a scenario that satisfies both requirements AND is consistent with Vegeta's typical power output. He can't destroy the planet. He died the second he exploded. There is no control beyond that point. He was dead. If he had even half of his planet destroying power, he would gave caused global damage. As for Vegeta being stronger than Cell, this just goes back to what I said earlier. Power level in DBZ only means you can beat an opponent with a lower power level than you. It does not mean you can cause the same damage he or she can.


He's not an emo either. If he was actually incapable of destroying the planet, then blowing himself up would have obviously been pointless. But to actually destroy the planet would have been just as bad. The only way that he could possibly have hoped for victory is if he can focus all his power around Buu. Again, why is this unusual? All he's doing is focusing a ki sphere- just like his Big Bang attack, or Goku's Genki Dama.

Look, let's take a look at it from the same starting perspective. Hypothetically, let's say that Vegeta had exactly the amount of energy needed to destroy Buu, which would also be enough to destroy the planet if he directly blasted the planet.
Under what circumstances could he attack Buu? Only if he's confident that he can control his energy to hit only Buu, right? Regardless of how powerful he is, if he can't control his energy to hit Buu alone then he would never attack.

Originally posted by StyleTime

This is getting a little too philosophical for my tastes. There's no real way to test the whole self awareness theory and I honestly doubt the author gave much thought it. The problem here is that you assume that self awareness somehow makes the name any more "real." A child named John by his parents would still have the "real" name of John even if he was raised to believe his name was Alex. Were John's full name written in the death note, he would die without ever knowing his "real" name. Names are properties initially bestowed upon us by someone else. Going by the events of death note, it is implied that the birth name, or first name, you are given is the one needed to kill you. Furthermore, the owner of the note must have the face of the person he wishes to kill in mind, so the death note does not operate exclusively off of the self awareness of the intended victim. Self awareness doesn't appear to be requirement at all really.


That depends on whether you define "real" as "legal"...you're right, this is getting philosophical. If we keep this up I don't think we're actually going to get anywhere, so we may as well drop it.
Originally posted by StyleTime

Should he? Maybe. Again, the logic of the show prevents that.

This last bit I address earlier though. Not only did Cell never do that, but Vegeta does not gain that ability simply by being of a higher power level.

If we accept those as true, then yes, we could end the discussion here. Unfortunately, well you know I'm going to say.

I disagree- power levels are based on Ki, so it's the other way round- fighters of the same power level, using the same attack in the same way should have the same effect.
Whereas they won't necessarily win if their opponent is smarter than they are, has better attacks, or can regenerate from nothing.
So I would say that Vegeta with Final Flash should be able to destroy more than Cell with Kamehameha if he has a higher power level.

Originally posted by ThunderGodEneru
Goku and Vegeta could not stop a planet destroying blast.

Surfer uses one planet destroying blast to win. 🙂

Show me a comics portrayal that Surfer ALONE can destroy a planet in a single fire power of his energy blast.

Originally posted by ThunderGodEneru
Them running away from Kid Buu's blast. 🙂

Kid Buu's blast is off the chart, power level of 18000 is planet buster level.

Originally posted by ThunderGodEneru
Yet it only destroyed a planet, and the estimation was only that it was ten times what would normally be required. 🙂

Nothing suggests in the Japanese anime that it can destroy ten planets but it’s ten times powerful than the previous planet busting attack that was deflected by Vegeta.

In the manga, nothing suggests that it’s ten times.

Originally posted by StyleTime
I'll address your two reasons for Vegeta's reluctance to destroy Namek before I proceed to my main point. Firstly, since you want to accept Arlia as being something more than filler, I guess I'll go ahead and use it. Vegeta clearly stands outside his spaceship when he fires his blast at Arlia. Saying he can't survive is rediculous as he already did. Heck, he even spoke while he was in space. Either you disregard Arlia and admit that the feat Vegeta gains here is rediculous, or you must accept that he breathes in space and would not refrain from destroying a planet because of it. Secondly, the dragon balls would be useless to Vegeta if he is dead. There is no logical reason why he would not blow up the planet to kill Frieza if his life was threatened....which it was.

So you disregard the portrayal about power level or ki sensing as a measurement of ki or power, it was stated. You can’t disregard the portrayal in the manga or anime for your real world logical reason. In fictional world, comics portrayal beats logical reason.

Originally posted by StyleTime
As for my main point here, I brought that up in my last post to show how Vegeta is virtually always displayed at less than planet busting. Even if he didn't destroy the planet, the guy should have done far more collateral damage than he did. Again, these are life and death situations. Vegeta has no reason to hold back. If I may illustrate my meaning, I ask that you look at this Silver Surfer vs Morg picture. In it, Surfer and Morg destroy a planet as a side effect of their battle.

I know that scan and as far as I remember, in the next panel the planet is still standing or not destroyed. Can you show me the next page as a proof?

Did you just say that “Surfer and Morg destroy a planet as a side effect of their battle”?
Is there any proof that Surfer alone or Morg alone can destroy a planet with a single fire power of their energy blast and not just some side effect of the clash of energy?
And take note, what matters most in the fictional world is comics portrayal not logical reason from our world. Comics portrayal usually beats logic. There are no comics portrayal that Surfer alone or Morg alone can destroy a planet with a single fire power of energy blast.

Originally posted by StyleTime
Was Surfer's goal to destroy the planet? No, but he couldn't help it. This isn't about Silver Surfer of course, but I am trying to illustrate a point. If you have even near planet destroying power and have to use it to defeat your foe, the planet will be destroyed or severely damaged whether you want it to or not. Even if Vegeta was holding back for whatever convenient reason you wish to offer him, he should still at least wreak some large scale havok in any of the situations I've mentioned. Why didn't he? He can't destroy the planet.

You only proved us that there were no comics portrayal that Surfer alone can destroy a planet with a single FIRE POWER of his energy blast.

Originally posted by StyleTime
I don't think he is that stupid either. Which is why self-destructed. He knew he could not blow up the planet. There is a scenario that satisfies both requirements AND is consistent with Vegeta's typical power output. He can't destroy the planet. He died the second he exploded. There is no control beyond that point. He was dead. If he had even half of his planet destroying power, he would gave caused global damage. As for Vegeta being stronger than Cell, this just goes back to what I said earlier. [B]Power level in DBZ only means you can beat an opponent with a lower power level than you. It does not mean you can cause the same damage he or she can.

Their power levels rise of course. I won't deny that. [/B]

It was not stated or portrayed in the manga that “power level SIMPLY means you can beat an opponent with a lower power level than you” but it is a measurement of ki. Read the namek arc, it was stated that it power level is a measurement of power. You do know what measurement means do you? It only proves and shows how much progress they gain in time.

Originally posted by StyleTime

This is getting a little too philosophical for my tastes. There's no real way to test the whole self awareness theory and I honestly doubt the author gave much thought it. The problem here is that you assume that self awareness somehow makes the name any more "real." A child named John by his parents would still have the "real" name of John even if he was raised to believe his name was Alex. Were John's full name written in the death note, he would die without ever knowing his "real" name. Names are properties initially bestowed upon us by someone else. Going by the events of death note, it is implied that the birth name, or first name, you are given is the one needed to kill you. Furthermore, the owner of the note must have the face of the person he wishes to kill in mind, so the death note does not operate exclusively off of the self awareness of the intended victim. Self awareness doesn't appear to be requirement at all really.

What you're saying doesn't really apply in fictional worlds. Dragon Ball and other comics are fictional worlds, what was measured inside that fictional world or what was portrayed is what matters most and not the logical reason or theories from our world.

As for Surfer's matter manipulation, I still believe that it will not work because Surfer couldn't matter manipulate Tyrant, Champion, Runner and Obliterator's body. And the names that I mentioned were not matter manipulator or reality warper.

haha goku or vegeta could not stop a planet destroying attack, that guy should be a comedian 😛

Considering they IIRC were not able to during the Buu saga?

Originally posted by nij-ayias
Show me a comics portrayal that Surfer [B]ALONE can destroy a planet in a single fire power of his energy blast.

Kid Buu's blast is off the chart, power level of 18000 is planet buster level.

Nothing suggests in the Japanese anime that it can destroy ten planets but it’s ten times powerful than the previous planet busting attack that was deflected by Vegeta.

In the manga, nothing suggests that it’s ten times.

So you disregard the portrayal about power level or ki sensing as a measurement of ki or power, it was stated. You can’t disregard the portrayal in the manga or anime for your real world logical reason. In fictional world, comics portrayal beats logical reason.

I know that scan and as far as I remember, in the next panel the planet is still standing or not destroyed. Can you show me the next page as a proof?

Did you just say that “Surfer and Morg destroy a planet as a side effect of their battle”?
Is there any proof that Surfer alone or Morg alone can destroy a planet with a single fire power of their energy blast and not just some side effect of the clash of energy?
And take note, what matters most in the fictional world is comics portrayal not logical reason from our world. Comics portrayal usually beats logic. There are no comics portrayal that Surfer alone or Morg alone can destroy a planet with a single fire power of energy blast.

You only proved us that there were no comics portrayal that Surfer alone can destroy a planet with a single FIRE POWER of his energy blast.

It was not stated or portrayed in the manga that “power level SIMPLY means you can beat an opponent with a lower power level than you” but it is a measurement of ki. Read the namek arc, it was stated that it power level is a measurement of power. You do know what measurement means do you? It only proves and shows how much progress they gain in time.

What you're saying doesn't really apply in fictional worlds. Dragon Ball and other comics are fictional worlds, what was measured inside that fictional world or what was portrayed is what matters most and not the logical reason or theories from our world.

As for Surfer's matter manipulation, I still believe that it will not work because Surfer couldn't matter manipulate Tyrant, Champion, Runner and Obliterator's body. And the names that I mentioned were not matter manipulator or reality warper. [/B]

Ummm just curious did Surfer even try and matter manip any of those guys,I just read through the some of the fights he never tried matter manip on Champion or Obliterator except for his weapons which worked easily,unless you can provide proof of him trying in another fight I'm unaware of and I don't think he did Tyrant either unless once again you can provide some proof.Also you want proof of Surfer's planet busting capabilities here you go......

http://img260.imageshack.us/img260/1787/annihilationsilversurfemi9.jpg

http://img183.imageshack.us/img183/4227/annihilationsilversurfegj7.jpg

Not to mention Surfer has enough power to create a massive black hole with a simple discharge of energy I'm sure even without the proof provided he would have enough to destroy a planet fairly easy.

Originally posted by StyleTime
I may have been a bit unclear. Vegeta wanted to kill t Frieza and knew he'd need all his power to do so. Even if destroying the planet would not destroy Frieza, Vegeta did not have this knowledge. There's no reason he wouldn't have attempted to do it to try and kill Frieza since his other efforts were obviously in vain. I did not intend to comment on Frieza's durability. I hope that clears it up.

As for the comics thing, I and many others will admit when environmental damage should occur in comics. So far I haven't brought up something that was unreasonable in a comic. In fact, I just used a scan of a comic where collateral damage happened as it should. I'm not sure of what specific instances you refer to, but I'm sure comic fans would happily discuss the issue with you. In all honesty, the hyperbole used by dbz arguments seems far, far worse considering we generally don't allow the same hyperbole for comics. If we did, Cyclops would be a planet buster.

Vegeta wanted eternal life, he tried his hardest to avoid Freeza when possible. Destroying the planet would be suicide because if at that point he was strong enough to survive the explosion he'd eventually die in space. Regardless, If Vegeta chose suicide which I doubt he would at this point, he would never have the opportunity to do it. If he tried to put Freeza in the scenario he did Goku during their beam struggle, Freeza would have killed him long before he gathered the energy to blow the planet. and if Freeza let him gather it, Freeza would would over power it easily. and you are forgetting towards the end Vegeta thought he could beat Freeza straight up.

I didn't say you brought up something unreasonable in comics, my point was that if it was reversed nobody would say lack of environment damage indicates lack of power for Thor, WWH, and the like. I am a 'comic fan', I'm in the versus forum more than anywhere. I don't need someone to tell me what I see for myself all the time. and hyperbole is worse in comics, a million exploding suns is just one of the many examples that you are bound to get when you use narration panels so much. Have you seen Cyclops' limit? I haven't.

Originally posted by ThunderGodEneru
Considering they IIRC were not able to during the Buu saga?

Vegeta stopped one and the other was too big to deflect safely.

Originally posted by TheBadguy
a million exploding suns is just one of the many examples that you are bound to get when you use narration panels so much.

That and don't forget how the man with the power of a million exploding suns couldn't take a little fire from the original human torch.

Vegeta's plan wouldn't have been "blow up the planet."

Instead, he had a better plan. His plan was to injure himself, and have Dende heal him, causing his power level to grow even higher. When he recieved this upgrade, he was confident that he could beat Frieza, and that he was finally a "Super Saiyan."

At this point, he isn't going to attempt to blow up the planet, since he figures he can win. However, he fails, and Frieza beats continually pummels him, and then kills him.

Originally posted by ThunderGodEneru
Considering they IIRC were not able to during the Buu saga?

They couldn't stop Buu's attack which was powerful enough to destroy the Earth. But Vegeta's Galick Gun in the very first fight with Goku was also powerful enough, and that could be batted away with one hand by any significant fighter later in the series- cf. Trunks lifts Frieza's destruction ball with one hand at beginning of Android Saga. So you can't lump all planet destroying attacks in the one category in terms of energy.

Originally posted by TheBadguy
Vegeta stopped one and the other was too big to deflect safely.
Oh right, the "That's too big for us" argument.

The blast was large because it was powerful, it was too powerful for them, and hell, it killed the Z fighters still present on the planet. And it was a planet destroying blast.

They never said it was too big to be deflected safely, only that the blast he was making was too large to be meant for them.

Originally posted by jimBOFH
They couldn't stop Buu's attack which was powerful enough to destroy the Earth. But Vegeta's Galick Gun in the very first fight with Goku was also powerful enough, and that could be batted away with one hand by any significant fighter later in the series- cf. Trunks lifts Frieza's destruction ball with one hand at beginning of Android Saga. So you can't lump all planet destroying attacks in the one category in terms of energy.
Trunks never stopped a Death Ball, in the canon manga, Freeza never even used it on Trunks.

And when was Vegeta's Galick Gun in the saiyan saga ever indicated to be planet destroying? Because he only destroyed a planet with it in the noncanon filler.

So does anybody know who would win out of Casshern and Iron Man?

Originally posted by ThunderGodEneru
And when was Vegeta's Galick Gun in the saiyan saga ever indicated to be planet destroying? Because he only destroyed a planet with it in the noncanon filler.

http://i42.tinypic.com/1z2nda8.jpg

This is before Vegeta says it later during their fight

Originally posted by ThunderGodEneru
Oh right, the "That's too big for us" argument.

The blast was large because it was powerful, it was too powerful for them, and hell, it killed the Z fighters still present on the planet. And it was a planet destroying blast.

They never said it was too big to be deflected safely, only that the blast he was making was too large to be meant for them.

No it wasn't, and it killed them while they were unconscious and just dragged out of Buu. and yes Goku said it was too big to deflect. ssj3 Goku was at least equal to Kid Buu, if it was about strength he would have deflected it. Despite that Vegeta still jumped in front of it. We went over this in detail with scans a few pages ago

Originally posted by TheBadguy
Its funny the way people have tried to spin this. Size has plenty to do with it, especially when the hugeness of something is pointed out. They did not freak out about its power at all, infact you can look at the small blast just before it for proof of that.

Buu throws the small planet buster, what does Goku do? He freaks out about it, then its deflected by Vegeta. Goku even continues freaking after is been deflected.
http://s5.tinypic.com/2h4yepw.jpg

Once again not once do any of them make any remark about the power of Buu's blast, which would be the first thing they would do if they were impressed by its power. Goku specifically mentions its too big to deflect.
http://s5.tinypic.com/av0oc7.jpg

The whole point of Kid Buu was not about power, he wasn't even top 5 power wise in that arc. The point of Kid Buu was his lack of reason, he acted off pure instinct which made him dangerous. Power wise he was not above ssj3 Goku. Which further proves if it was about power then ssj3 Goku could have done whatever you think he should have. So its either PIS that they didn't try to deflect the blast or it was like Goku said, too big to deflect safely.

and after looking at it again, Vegeta had jumped in front of the blast so he planned to do something before Goku told him his plan.
http://s5.tinypic.com/2cegn43.jpg

Further, I can't recall any of the giant ball type attacks being successfully deflected, only beamstruggles.