Originally posted by Punkyhermy
babes.love can't be fallen out of. lust can and always does. love is not something initiated by flow of hormonal chemicals.and don't exaggerate the situation. its got nothing to do with you slitting your wrists. its got to do with you truely loving someone you only claim to have "loved". the feeble picture you painted above proves nohing more than your apparent very feeble grasp on the concept. 😬
Love can't be fallen out of completely, I agree there. I think if you've truly loved a person then that love you had for them will never be totally gone, if that makes sense.
Lust is usually the first thing we feel when we come across someone we find attractive on the most basic level, physically. Secondary to that would be the mental attraction which, of course, requires at least one conversation. Those things combined would probably be the best things to lay the foundations for love to be built upon. I'm not suggesting we're all shallow, but physical attraction is clearly going to come first in most cases because, if I'm honest, if I were repulsed by someone or even didn't happen to notice them, then a conversation leading to appreciation for that person isn't likely to occur.
Love is developed. After the foundations for a friendship and more have been laid, one might fall in love. So, theoretically, love is something initiated by a flow of chemicals because without the lust, the love may never happen.
As for your referring to Kelly as feeble, I think you're way out of line. She's discussing her relationship, her feelings and her subsequent decisions. Who are you to tell her how she really felt? I'm sorry, but when you combine the fact that you're practically a stranger to her with the fact that you've never experienced 'love' and all its elements personally, you would be the last person I'd trust to pass judgement on as delicate a situation as this. No matter how intellectual you may sound or how condescending you try not to be.
Originally posted by ADarksideJedi
If I was a **** maybe.jm
Again, we're not all whores and s.luts 🙂
Originally posted by BobbyD
Please tell me that you're kidding me, or I'm being clear enough.....
Originally posted by Syren
Love can't be fallen out of completely, I agree there. I think if you've truly loved a person then that love you had for them will never be totally gone, if that makes sense.Lust is usually the first thing we feel when we come across someone we find attractive on the most basic level, physically. Secondary to that would be the mental attraction which, of course, requires at least one conversation. Those things combined would probably be the best things to lay the foundations for love to be built upon. I'm not suggesting we're all shallow, but physical attraction is clearly going to come first in most cases because, if I'm honest, if I were repulsed by someone or even didn't happen to notice them, then a conversation leading to appreciation for that person isn't likely to occur.
Love is developed. After the foundations for a friendship and more have been laid, one might fall in love. So, theoretically, love is something initiated by a flow of chemicals because without the lust, the love may never happen.
As for your referring to Kelly as feeble, I think you're way out of line. She's discussing her relationship, her feelings and her subsequent decisions. Who are you to tell her how she really felt? I'm sorry, but when you combine the fact that you're practically a stranger to her with the fact that you've never experienced 'love' and all its elements personally, you would be the last person I'd trust to pass judgement on as delicate a situation as this. No matter how intellectual you may sound or how condescending you try not to be.
Again, we're not all whores and s.luts 🙂