What's worse: Pedophiles or Murderers? · General Discussion Forum

pr1983 Hey Yo!

The more disturbing motive? Paedophilia (i mean, to want to do that to someone... its disgusting imo. People can kill each other over anything nowadays, all it takes is to be incredibly greedy (in the case of muggings) or simply an assh*le: 'you insult me so i'll blow your brains out' charming...

The worst crime? Murder (Obviously imo, its someones entire life, gone. just like that.)

So murder is worse...

Just my two cents and so on.

PVS Restricted

im insulted that you didnt include timothy dalton in your sig.
i have nothing more to say to you

ThePittman "Pitt Happens"

Originally posted by Victor Von Doom
Someone kills someone. Then someone who knew someone kills the first someone for killing the second someone. The third someone is then killed by a fourth someone who knew the second someone. Then everyone kills everyone.
All because you claim murder is better than paedophilia. I hope you can live with yourself. Possibly literally, if that scenario plays out.

Give me a fricking break, really how often does that really happen, maybe in gangs but in real life that happen very rarely and I mean rarely. Does the mother that lost her child kill the person that did it? Does she want to yes but does she do it? The likelihood of someone that is abuse as a child committing crimes or suicide compared to someone that lost someone due to murder is not even comparable. You have missed my point entirely, even if someone killed the person that killed that person in normally stops there because in the mind of most civilized people that is an eye for an eye but if you convict the person or killed the person that raped you child that kid is still distraught and studies have shown to still commit crimes. If you scenario played out there would be no one left but sexually abuse children have a higher percentage of committing the same crime.

debbiejo Dreamer

Originally posted by Victor Von Doom
Someone kills someone. Then someone who knew someone kills the first someone for killing the second someone. The third someone is then killed by a fourth someone who knew the second someone. Then everyone kills everyone.
All because you claim murder is better than paedophilia. I hope you can live with yourself. Possibly literally, if that scenario plays out.

The McCoys VS....ummm I don't remember...hmmm....oh the Hatfield's???? ..Feuds.............. 🙄

ThePittman "Pitt Happens"

Let me put this scenario to you all. What would cause you more pain as a parent that your child is dead or that you get to live with your child as they try and deal with the fact that they were abused by your cousin or what ever knowing that they may kill themselves, live in depression or never be able to get over this, listening to there cries at night and folding in on themselves? Can people get over being abuse, yes but it changes them forever and they are never the same again so in essence they have been killed and they will never be that person again.

redcaped Restricted

What's worse: Pedophiles or Murderers?

Originally posted by bigbran
So, what is worse:
Someone who touches children, or someone who kills people (on purpose)?

A slide of pizza

Rogue Jedi Restricted

being killed and being molested are totally different. i cant believe they are being compared.

Roulette Freak

Re: What's worse: Pedophiles or Murderers?

Originally posted by bigbran
So, what is worse:
Someone who touches children, or someone who kills people (on purpose)?

Murderers.

Pedophiles are sick people, but murderers are worse....they're on a completely different level.

Victor Von Doom Latverian Diplomat

Originally posted by ThePittman
Give me a fricking break, really how often does that really happen

Why, it happened yesterday.

Originally posted by ThePittman

Does the mother that lost her child kill the person that did it? Does she want to yes but does she do it? The likelihood of someone that is abuse as a child committing crimes or suicide compared to someone that lost someone due to murder is not even comparable. You have missed my point entirely, even if someone killed the person that killed that person in normally stops there because in the mind of most civilized people that is an eye for an eye but if you convict the person or killed the person that raped you child that kid is still distraught and studies have shown to still commit crimes. If you scenario played out there would be no one left but sexually abuse children have a higher percentage of committing the same crime.

I didn't miss your point, I was satirising it. It's not even relevant to the question.

Globally destructive nuclear holocaust: can only happen once.

Drug crimes- can turn into a continual cycle.

Which is worse? Don't deviate from your own logic- which is worse?

Secondly, did I just read you saying 'even if someone killed the person that killed that person in normally stops there because in the mind of most civilized people that is an eye for an eye' ?

Are you seriously claiming that revenge murders stop after the first retaliation, because someone is going to say 'ah well. That's quite clearly an eye for an eye- let's leave it at that' ?

It's comical how the murderers named in the thread title are apparently good old fashioned murderers, kill one and be done.

The paedophiles seem to be rampant lunatics creating worldwide butterfly effects of touching.

xmarksthespot CEO, BS Comics

Originally posted by Victor Von Doom
The paedophiles seem to be rampant lunatics creating worldwide butterfly effects of touching.

Hmm... somehow you made molestation seem whimsical.

Alpha Centauri Restricted

If anything, paedophila is the better option BECAUSE the person can actually carry on living. Yet it seems to be the argument for it being worse.

Continual effects and trauma from paedophilia differ from person to person, murder results in death without exception, and for eternity.

-AC

Bardock42 Junior Member

Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
If anything, paedophila is the better option BECAUSE the person can actually carry on living. Yet it seems to be the argument for it being worse.
Continual effects and trauma from paedophilia differ from person to person, murder results in death without exception, and for eternity.
-AC

Yeah, well, but they are still dead. So they won't care too much I assume.

Victor Von Doom Latverian Diplomat

Originally posted by xmarksthespot
Hmm... somehow you made molestation seem whimsical.

Are you jealous?

On another note: would you (plural) prefer a close friend or family member to be murdered or abused?

Bardock42 Junior Member

Originally posted by Victor Von Doom
Are you jealous?
On another note: would you (plural) prefer a close friend or family member to be murdered or abused?

One I like, I assume. I don't know. I guess whatever they would prefer.

Victor Von Doom Latverian Diplomat

Ever the pragmatist (bastard).

xmarksthespot CEO, BS Comics

Originally posted by Victor Von Doom
Are you jealous?
On another note: would you (plural) prefer a close friend or family member to be murdered or abused?

That's quite the loaded question. I'm assuming this is an absolute either or situation and that I must make the decision independently. Long story short, I'd rather let him or her stay over with Batman than Joker.

Victor Von Doom Latverian Diplomat

Originally posted by xmarksthespot
That's quite the loaded question. I'm assuming this is an absolute either or situation. Long story short, I'd rather let him or her stay over with Batman than Joker.

Bardock will be annoyed (or overjoyed) with that implication.

Bardock42 Junior Member

Originally posted by xmarksthespot
That's quite the loaded question. I'm assuming this is an absolute either or situation and that I must make the decision independently. Long story short, I'd rather let him or her stay over with Batman than Joker.

Not bad, not bad.

Bardock42 Junior Member

Originally posted by Victor Von Doom
Bardock will be annoyed (or overjoyed) with that implication.

This happens to be true. I think I typed out 4 to 5 different replies to it, one more insane than the other due to me not being sure if I liked it or hated it. I then settled for the most reasonable one. I have so much self control.

ThePittman "Pitt Happens"

Originally posted by Victor Von Doom
Why, it happened yesterday.

How many murders have you heard off that they have killed the killer out of revenge? There are thousands of murders each years and by your logic every one would be dead. Did I say it didn’t happen, no it is very rare that it happens and as I said more or less in gangs.

Originally posted by Victor Von Doom
I didn't miss your point, I was satirising it. It's not even relevant to the question.
Globally destructive nuclear holocaust: can only happen once.
Drug crimes- can turn into a continual cycle.
Which is worse? Don't deviate from your own logic- which is worse?

Nice way to stack the question and comparing something that kills millions to billions to drug crimes is laughable. You have missed my point entirely.

Originally posted by Victor Von Doom
Secondly, did I just read you saying 'even if someone killed the person that killed that person in normally stops there because in the mind of most civilized people that is an eye for an eye' ?

In the mind of most civilized people that is a just punishment, and as I said (which you keep missing) I said most not all, you will have you people that will want to kill the entire family for killing their kid but again that is very VERY rare.

Originally posted by Victor Von Doom
Are you seriously claiming that revenge murders stop after the first retaliation, because someone is going to say 'ah well. That's quite clearly an eye for an eye- let's leave it at that' ?

Again you do not understand my post and miss that I say most and not all.

Originally posted by Victor Von Doom
It's comical how the murderers named in the thread title are apparently good old fashioned murderers, kill one and be done.
The paedophiles seem to be rampant lunatics creating worldwide butterfly effects of touching.

Again and not all, can one killing start lots of killing, yes and they are called wars with your logic. No one would be alive with your logic. You really need to study criminology and psychology and learn and see the effects of sexual abuse on a minor and see what it does to their lives and then maybe you would fricken understand. Watching your friend wishing they were dead then waking up every night with the same nightmare of them abusing you over and over again is a F*CKING living death. It’s nice to know that you would rater be tortured for the rest of you life then for someone to waste a bullet on you.