which immortality would you rather have?

Started by capt it up8 pages

Originally posted by StarsNeverFall7
Do I really need to post scans of both of them "DYING" and their regeneration alone bringing them back to life? Neither of them need immortality at all, DP got his because of a story arc, Wolverine was handed his just because, thats what I was referring to as being "stupid". The words "I dislike or hate Wolverine" were never typed in any of my post, im actually a fan of his. Like I said neither of them need it as both have died and came back, if scans are necessary I can get them. Deadpools has a story arc behind it and he wasnt just handed his for the hell of it, hence why I said DP's made sense and Wolvies didnt.

first off lgoans went with his story arc. Also Logan has died for real before to the point were his healing factor was not bringing him back.

If he has "died for real" before and his healing didnt bring him back, then its bad writing on the characters abilities. Unless he was obliderated into nothing, which with an adamantium skeleton I highly doubt. Both occurances im refering to, Wolverine has his heart exploded from the inside, and DP's had his ripped out, both died. Both came back, like I said neither one of them NEED it, Wolverines was handed to him, DP's is a curse.

As far as immortality goes, Ill still take DP's.

Originally posted by StarsNeverFall7
If he has "died for real" before and his healing didnt bring him back, then its bad writing on the characters abilities. Unless he was obliderated into nothing, which with an adamantium skeleton I highly doubt. Both occurances im refering to, Wolverine has his heart exploded from the inside, and DP's had his ripped out, both died. Both came back, like I said neither one of them NEED it, Wolverines was handed to him, DP's is a curse.

As far as immortality goes, Ill still take DP's.


hand to him he was born with it. DP got cursed.

Logan has died in comic to the point were he was dead like no lfie sighns and just dead. He came back ounce and saved jeans life she thought it was to save her and maybe it was it was never discussed by logan.

Dead usually means no life signs. I think you're getting their HF and immortality confused. Just because they can heal, doesn't make them immortal. Maybe able to live for a few thousand years, but not immortal.
The being "dead with no life signs" doesn't make a difference unless you destroy every one of his cells. If they didnt. take that into account, it was bad writing to the characters abilities

Originally posted by StarsNeverFall7
Dead usually means no life signs. I think you're getting their HF and immortality confused. Just because they can heal, doesn't make them immortal. Maybe able to live for a few thousand years, but not immortal.
The being "dead with no life signs" doesn't make a difference unless you destroy every one of his cells. If they didnt. take that into account, it was bad writing to the characters abilities

logan was just explained to be immortal. trust me I know the character about 100 times better then you. Logan has had his healing factor taxed out to the fact he was dead fully dead how ever he came back to live through the means of his immortality.

You still don't seem to be able to understand what I'm saying, so its really a mute point, because now im just trying to argue Wolverine Fanboyism, which god knows, is a battle we cant win.

Hard to choose here.

Originally posted by StarsNeverFall7
You still don't seem to be able to understand what I'm saying, so its really a mute point, because now im just trying to argue Wolverine Fanboyism, which god knows, is a battle we cant win.

you clearly don't read wolverine comics that I am certain

Originally posted by capt it up
whats the problem with that? lets see they enevr been staed to have it. secondary mutations came out like last year. They have never onces been said or stated to have a secondary mutation.

did I ever say I was the word of marvel?

Does the comic have to SPECIFICALLY state in-panel whether or not it's a secondary mutation?

Originally posted by Metalmanx
Does the comic have to SPECIFICALLY state in-panel whether or not it's a secondary mutation?

yes it does. Its a enw concepted and every one who has had one has been stated

Originally posted by capt it up
yes it does. Its a enw concepted and every one who has had one has been stated

I was not aware this was a required thing. So, how much are they paying you as a writer down at Marvel? A good fee, I hope.

Magneto didn't gain his powers until adulthood. Secondary mutation just means that the power is secondary to their primary mutation.

Originally posted by Metalmanx
I was not aware this was a required thing. So, how much are they paying you as a writer down at Marvel? A good fee, I hope.

first off you know dam right well ever eprson with a second mutation has been stated with such. it was a big deal when it came out and yet if ngith crawler had one the whole time then why were they so surpized when they al found out about secondary mutations?

Originally posted by capt it up
you clearly don't read wolverine comics that I am certain

I am certain that you clearly don't read and comprehend posts.

With writers like this, its no wonder Wolverine beats Galactus...

Originally posted by StarsNeverFall7
I am certain that you clearly don't read and comprehend posts.

With writers like this, its no wonder Wolverine beats Galactus...


yup ypou proved you do not read wolverine with that post.

Logan was unable to hurt galactus.