Do you think it's ok that China bans religion freedom?

Started by Eis5 pages

Originally posted by ysh227
Do you think it's ok that China bans religion freedom?

Many Americans people are pretty upset about China because Chinese government disallow religion freedom; they do not allow any religion institue built in there....

and 93% of Chinese are agnostic or atheistic.....

So some people use the word "communism" to insult Chinese people...
but have you thought about why Chinese government is banning religion freedom???

I think there is a reason
China, right now, is becoming a high-tech based nation. It will not be as good as Japan in term of technology, but close.

They are afraid that if religion freedom is allowed in China, those religious fanatics will try anyway to destroy their progress.

That's my feeling
I don't know about yours...
so although banning religion freedom might seem to be rude, there are reasons...or why do they need to do that?


Your knowledge on contemporary Chinese history is absolute crap. Unless you take pleasure in humiliating yourself, refrain yourself from ever making a thread on a subject which you obviously know so little of.

Wehn technology takes over our world, banning religions will be available everywhere

Originally posted by xmarksthespot
At a personal level it can at best be credited as one of many possible motivations one may have an inquisitive nature about the mechanisms underlying the natural world, and consequently may pursue science. However these same people would likely still have other reasons to motivate them in the absence of religion.

Ok.

Originally posted by xmarksthespot

At an institutional level, religion has very often been hindrance rather than help for scientific advancement.

Well yes but I think also it has been very often not a hindrance. Again Islam in the middle ages, the Christian monks were very educated and studied medicine and some of them architecture. Then there are the druids.....

Re: Do you think it's ok that China bans religion freedom?

Originally posted by ysh227
Do you think it's ok that China bans religion freedom?

Many Americans people are pretty upset about China because Chinese government disallow religion freedom; they do not allow any religion institue built in there....

I am an Athiest, and I don't agree with banning religion, as such, although I do think religious freedom should perhaps be somewhat restricted. I believe there is, in fact, too much religious freedom.

I also don't understand why Americans are so upset over this. It is not their country, therefore none of their concern.

I also don't understand why Americans are so upset over this. It is not their country, therefore none of their concern.

By that logic Darfur and Rawanda shouldn't haven been/be touched either.

Originally posted by ysh227
Wehn technology takes over our world, banning religions will be available everywhere

Thats a load of crap you haven't heard anything I have just said.

Originally posted by ysh227
Do you think it's ok that China bans religion freedom?

Many Americans people are pretty upset about China because Chinese government disallow religion freedom; they do not allow any religion institue built in there....

and 93% of Chinese are agnostic or atheistic.....

So some people use the word "communism" to insult Chinese people...
but have you thought about why Chinese government is banning religion freedom???

I think there is a reason
China, right now, is becoming a high-tech based nation. It will not be as good as Japan in term of technology, but close.

They are afraid that if religion freedom is allowed in China, those religious fanatics will try anyway to destroy their progress.

That's my feeling
I don't know about yours...
so although banning religion freedom might seem to be rude, there are reasons...or why do they need to do that?

I think it's wrong to ban religion. However I think there should be a complete and total seperation of church and state. Churches should be taxed. Known religious leaders should be banned from running for political office. And a very descisive line should be drawn between what is up for public debate and what is a matter of personal concerns that need not be debated in a public manner.

I don't think it's possible to wipe out religion. It may be possible to severely restrict organized religions. But I doubt any government can squash religion on every level. It's existence is a result of the human condition.

I'm not sure where the correlation between religious freedom and technology is coming from in your mind.

Originally posted by Eis
Your knowledge on contemporary Chinese history is absolute crap. Unless you take pleasure in humiliating yourself, refrain yourself from ever making a thread on a subject which you obviously know so little of.

Speak up and tell us where he's wrong. You're in a position to enlighten us.

Speak up and tell us where he's wrong. You're in a position to enlighten us.

Well first of all I am quite sure it is illegal for private organizations to conduct surveys on religion here. All the info that's available is most likely government given.
Second Taoism is very hard to define but people here that practice Taoism in one or other way are by the hundreds of millions.

And also, Chinese government doesn't ban religion freedom because they are afraid of Christian fundamentalists but because they don't want people following any other kind of thought other than theirs.
By the way, almost all religions are allowed now a days anyway, I've seen Catholic churches, meccas, Mormon temples, Jewish synagogues, etc.

Originally posted by Alfheim
Thats a load of crap you haven't heard anything I have just said.

Alfmeim everything you have said has proved nothing other than religious people have made inventions. The fact is that people use religion to govern certain types of research. Stem cell research and cloning are two types of research that religion is fighting against. Bush (who is a religious nut) vetoed a bill to give funding for stem cell research because of his religion. And now we are behind 4 years on the research because of religion. In those 4 years they could have found a cure for paralysis or something like that.

So yes Religion can do nothing but hold the world back in terms of technology it has nothing to help the advancement of technology. Also take a history class the catholic church did everything in there power to disprove Galileo when he said the earth wasn’t the center of the universe.

Originally posted by ysh227
Wehn technology takes over our world, banning religions will be available everywhere

A rise in technology does not give a government to the right to infringe its people's rights.

I think there is a reason
China, right now, is becoming a high-tech based nation. It will not be as good as Japan in term of technology, but close.

They are afraid that if religion freedom is allowed in China, those religious fanatics will try anyway to destroy their progress.

Of course there's a reason. The same reason Stalin banned religious freedom; churches have power, and if there's one thing Communist dictatorships hate, it's competition.

Originally posted by dirkdirden
Alfmeim everything you have said has proved nothing other than religious people have made inventions. The fact is that people use religion to govern certain types of research. Stem cell research and cloning are two types of research that religion is fighting against. Bush (who is a religious nut) vetoed a bill to give funding for stem cell research because of his religion. And now we are behind 4 years on the research because of religion. In those 4 years they could have found a cure for paralysis or something like that.

So yes Religion can do nothing but hold the world back in terms of technology it has nothing to help the advancement of technology. Also take a history class the catholic church did everything in there power to disprove Galileo when he said the earth wasn’t the center of the universe.

Complete waste of time, just ignore everything I said and focus on the negative aspects of religon. You really need to read my posts again if you can be bothered, this is wack.

You know what:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/3745498.stm

he medical world of medieval monks
By Jane Elliott
BBC News

Soutra Aisle. Pic😛hilip Coppens
All that remains of the hospital

Anaesthetics and disinfectants are thought to be a modern medical invention but evidence is coming to light that medieval doctors knew of them too.

Evidence found at the ancient Soutra Hospital site, in Scotland, suggests the medieval Augustine monks also knew how to amputate limbs, fashion surgical instruments, induce birth, stop scurvy and even create hangover cures.

The excavations at Soutra have also unearthed fragments of pottery vessels that were once used for storing medicines such as an analgesic salve made from opium and grease and treatment for parasitic and intestinal worms.

Dressings have also been found, some still with salves or human tissues attached and the scientists have discovered a mixture of Quicklime (calcium oxide) which scientists believe was used as a disinfectant and a deodorant.

Research

The hospital, high in the Lammermuir Hills, near Edinburgh, was dedicated to looking after the poor, travellers and pilgrims as well as the sick and infirm.

Dr Brian Moffat archeo-ethno-pharmocologist and director of investigations for the Soutra Project, studies clumps of seeds from the site.

We are in the unprecedented position to evaluate this system of medicine recipe by recipe - and ask, did all of it - or any of it - work?
Dr Brian Moffat

He said the scientists trawl literature of the period to try and identify remedies the herbs could have been used to create.

They then search the site to find medical waste evidence to support their theories.

He said that, using these methods, they had made a number of extremely significant finds and are regularly turning up new evidence about how ailments were treated during medieval times.

"We reckon we have stumbled upon a means of reconstructing medical practices."

Texts

He said that the methods used were considered controversial by some archaeologists, because they do not find direct evidence of the medicine in use, but their findings were always corroborated by other experts.

When ergot fungus and juniper berry seeds were found at Soutra scientists were intrigued about their use.

Searching the historical texts suggests they were used to help induce birth, despite a ban on men in holy orders assisting in any aspect of childbirth.

"When we looked at the site we found the still-born bodies of malnourished babies nearby so it is impossible not to link them," Dr Moffat said.

We began to think that the watercress was being used to ease scurvy
Dr Brian Moffat

"There was a ban on men in holy orders from interfering in childbirth, so any pregnant woman was left in the hands of an experienced village woman, but this would have been unacceptable to certain powerful people who wanted their wife or daughter to be looked after by physicians."

Another find revealed clumps of watercress lying close to a pile of teeth.

"There was no sign of forcible extractions on the tooth.

"So we searched the waste to see what might have been thrown out alongside the teeth and we found a small mass of watercress.

"We realised that watercress is very rich in vitamin C and we began to think that the watercress was being used to ease scurvy.

"Then we found one of the medieval texts which said loose teeth can be 'fastened or secured' by eating watercress.

"We consulted the World Health Organization who confirmed that a boost of vitamin C would stop teeth falling out from a bout of scurvy."

"They had noticed that scurvy is reversible if they took certain vitamins."

Hemlock

One of the exciting finds was of the abundance of hemlock in the drains. Scientists think the monks had used this as a painkiller before carrying out amputations.

Next to this they found the remains of the heel bone of a man.

Tony Busettil, regus professor of forensic medicine at Edinburgh University who corroborated the Soutra find, said the bone had ridges on it, which indicated that the man had walked on the side of his foot.

"It showed that the person appears to have had a limp so they could have been suffering from some sort of congenital palsy.

"Next to it they found evidence of very strong pain killers."

Dr Moffat said the monks' knowledge of herbs was so great it could be used to influence medicine today.

"You would not bother with strange plants at a monastery unless they were going to be used and these medieval brothers knew what to do. They knew more about plants than anyone alive today," he added.

Stop focusing on the negative and remember there are positive examples as well.

Originally posted by Green Arrow
Crowded, overpriced, and way too sexual so I'm afraid everyone's got an std.
This counts as racism.

Originally posted by lord xyz
This counts as racism.

You've never been to Japan, so you're ignorant on the subject. I know many people from Japan and they've told me it's not a nice place to be.

oh, you, whob from the intranetz, know someone who told you. well, i guess this issue is closed 🙄

Originally posted by PVS
oh, you, whob from the intranetz, know someone who told you. well, i guess this issue is closed 🙄

Guess so. Don't you just feel crunchy.

Originally posted by PVS
oh, you, whob from the intranetz, know someone who told you. well, i guess this issue is closed 🙄

PVS, you think every new idoitic member is whob, don't you? 😂

Originally posted by Quiero Mota
PVS, you think every new idoitic member is whob, don't you? 😂

no, i just know whob's patterns of posting.
i am correct regardless of how funny and silly it all is.
he has a dynamic i.p. or is using a proxy. either way the mods cant
i.p. ban his loser ass, and so there are quite a few active whob accounts.

The same could be said about you. It's not very welcoming to come here for the first time to have some pissy liberal point his finger "Whob! Whob! Sock account Sock account!" Foaming at the mouth.

You know, for someone that does drugs, you sure are high strong.. (And yes, I know you do drugs cause you're liberal heehee.)

Originally posted by Green Arrow
The same could be said about you. It's not very welcoming to come here for the first time to have some pissy liberal point his finger "Whob! Whob! Sock account Sock account!" Foaming at the mouth.

You know, for someone that does drugs, you sure are high strong.. (And yes, I know you do drugs cause you're liberal heehee.)

-fin 😉