Originally posted by Emperor Ashtar
When did I say it's a law, I said it's a tradtion and it shouldn't be changed just to adhere to someone's beliefs. The book that members of the legistrative body make an oath on bearly has any bearings in there policy. It becomes a religuos issue when we start bringing other "sacred" text in. We don't live in a theocracy, so, it shouldn't matter or be a big deal the book he swears on.
Exactly - this isn't a theocracy, so it shouldn't matter or be a big deal what book it is he swears on.
So why is it a big deal that he decided to not use the bible?