For everyone who calls themself a Christian...

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
Not true. If that was true then there would be only on Christian denomination, and not this many:

African Methodist Episcopal
African Methodist Episcopal Zion
African Orthodox Church
American Baptist Churches USA
Amish
Anabaptist
Anglican Catholic Church
Anglican Church
Antiochian Orthodox
Armenian Evangelical Church
Armenian Orthodox
Assemblies of God
Associated Gospel Churches of Canada
Association of Vineyard Churches
Baptist
Baptist Bible Fellowship
Branch Davidian
Brethren in Christ
Bruderhof Communities
Byzantine Catholic Church
Calvary Chapel
Calvinist
Catholic
Cell Church
Celtic Orthodox
Charismatic Episcopal Church
Christadelphian
Christian and Missionary Alliance
Christian Churches of God
Christian Identity
Christian Reformed Church
Christian Science
Church of God (Anderson)
Church of God (Cleveland)
Church of God (Seventh Day)
Church of God in Christ
Church of God of Prophecy
Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints
Church of Scotland
Church of South India
Church of the Brethren
Church of the Lutheran Brethren of America
Church of the Nazarene
Church of the New Jerusalem
Church of the United Brethren in Christ
Church Universal and Triumphant
Churches of Christ
Churches of God General Conference
Congregational Christian Churches
Coptic Orthodox
Cumberland Presbyterian Church
Disciples of Christ
Episcopal Church
Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahedo Church
Evangelical Congregational Church
Evangelical Covenant Church
Evangelical Formosan Church
Evangelical Free Church
Evangelical Lutheran Church
Evangelical Methodist Church
Evangelical Presbyterian
Family, The (aka Children of God)
Fellowship of Christian Assemblies
Fellowship of Grace Brethren
Fellowship of Independent Evangelical Churches
Free Church of Scotland
Free Methodist
Free Presbyterian
Free Will Baptist
Gnostic
Great Commission Association of Churches
Greek Orthodox
Hutterian Brethren
Independent Fundamental Churches of America
Indian Orthodox
International Church of the Foursquare Gospel
International Churches of Christ
Jehovah's Witnesses
Living Church of God
Local Church
Lutheran
Lutheran Church - Missouri Synod
Mar Thoma Syrian Church
Mennonite
Messianic Judaism
Methodist
Moravian Church
Nation of Yahweh
New Frontiers International
Old Catholic Church
Orthodox
Orthodox Church in America
Orthodox Presbyterian
Pentecostal
Plymouth Brethren
Presbyterian
Presbyterian Church (USA)
Presbyterian Church in America
Primitive Baptist
Protestant Reformed Church
Reformed
Reformed Baptist
Reformed Church in America
Reformed Church in the United States
Reformed Churches of Australia
Reformed Episcopal Church
Reformed Presbyterian Church
Reorganized Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints
Revival Centres International
Romanian Orthodox
Rosicrucian
Russian Orthodox
Serbian Orthodox
Seventh Day Baptist
Seventh-Day Adventist
Shaker
Society of Friends
Southern Baptist Convention
Spiritist
Syrian Orthodox
True and Living Church of Jesus Christ of Saints of the Last Days
Two-by-Twos
Unification Church
Unitarian-Universalism
United Church of Canada
United Church of Christ
United Church of God
United Free Church of Scotland
United Methodist Church
United Reformed Church
Uniting Church in Australia
Unity Church
Unity Fellowship Church
Universal Fellowship of Metropolitan Community Churches
Virtual Churches
Waldensian Church
Way International, The
Web Directories
Wesleyan
Wesleyan Methodist
Worldwide Church of God

Meh, regardless of human *interpretation*(or denominations) - God(or Love) stays the same. If one is truly looking for love(or God) - they can easily find him, he does not make himself hard to find, and graciously offers his *love* to everyone who is willing to accept it.

Originally posted by usagi_yojimbo
Actually - I agree with you. But at the same time, it is still necessary for us to correct(not *judge*) our peers. If you love your brother - you will correct him. And if he loves you, he will accept this correction with love(love that's not expressed in a sexually speaking way of course).

Originally posted by usagi_yojimbo
Meh, regardless of human *interpretation*(or denominations) - God(or Love) stays the same. If one is truly looking for love(or God) - they can easily find him, he does not make himself hard to find, and graciously offers his *love* to everyone who is willing to accept it.

If one is truly looking for love(or God) - they can easily find him, he does not make himself hard to find,

Are you gay? 😂

Originally posted by PVS
no, its not really the place of a good christian to correct anyone. that would be an act of forcing change. perhaps to respectably suggest correction, but no further than that.

Meh - as long as one doesn't attach punishment to the *correction* - they are showing the individual they've corrected respect(and are not judging). The intentions of the heart of the correcter and the correctee(sp?) are also important. Sometimes the truth(or the correct answer may hurt the individual who has the wrong(incorrect one - but in the end, its the most loving answer one should give to their brother(again - this love is expressed in a non-sexual way).

Originally posted by usagi_yojimbo
Meh - as long as one doesn't attach punishment to the *correction* - they are showing the individual they've corrected respect(and are not judging). The intentions of the heart of the correcter and the correctee(sp?) are also important. Sometimes the truth(or the correct answer may hurt the individual who has the wrong(incorrect one)) - but in the end, its the most loving answer one should give to their brother(again - this love is expressed in a non-sexual way).

Can you please give an example of proper correction?

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
Will you please give an example of proper correction?

fixed..He..He..

Originally posted by usagi_yojimbo
fixed..He..He..

OK. I'm waiting...

Originally posted by usagi_yojimbo
Meh - as long as one doesn't attach punishment to the *correction* - they are showing the individual they've corrected respect(and are not judging). The intentions of the heart of the correcter and the correctee(sp?) are also important. Sometimes the truth(or the correct answer may hurt the individual who has the wrong(incorrect one - but in the end, its the most loving answer one should give to their brother(again - this love is expressed in a non-sexual way).

you keep it very vague. do you feel that 'correcting' should be politely suggested or forcably imposed??

Originally posted by PVS
You keep it very vague. Do you feel that 'correcting' should be politely suggested or forcibly imposed??

Fixed - and included is the answer to your question. You still have several more mintues to edit your post by the way...just a polite suggestion..He..He..

😂 That was clever.

ok, no nuthugging. thats homosexuality

anyway, usagi, you still fail to answer the question. i speak in the scope of law, and not superficial misspelling on teh intranetz

Originally posted by Nellinator
😂 That was clever.

I thought it was stupid. He did not answer the question, because the subject was not grammar.

He did answer the question. It took me a little while to see it too.

Originally posted by Nellinator
He did answer the question. It took me a little while to see it too.

He did not, he dodged.

Triple read it then, and maybe you'll see it. Grammar was not the real purpose of his post.

ahh, so we have a cheerleader 🙄

defy logic just to defend your hero, why dont ya?

Originally posted by Nellinator
😂 That was clever.

Every now and again it happens - but when it does happen, you know it's gonna be good..He..He..

a foolish person gives a foolish answer, but a true fool avoids the question

Ok, it sounds like some clarification is needed.
The answer was clearly 'politely suggest'. Using your grammar as an example, he politely suggested that you correct it and showed you how without forcibly imposing you into it. It was pretty obvious.

It might have been just a tiny, TINY bit clever were it not for the fact that usagi's first correction was wrong. Shakya's use of 'can' was correct.

But even if totally correct, it would have far more smug than clever, and in repetition in answering PVS, usagi is apparently answering that correction should be forced, from which, as Christian history shows, it is not many steps until you reach the Inquisition.

nellinator, you seem under the strange impression that no-one saw what usagi was doing. The misconception is yours- in fact everyone saw it, they just had well-deserved contempt for it.