Civil War Report

Started by Grimm22258 pages
Originally posted by BlaqChaos
That's why you don't resist arrest. Dr. King never resisted, Rosa Parks never resisted. When you resist arrest, you assume the risk that go along with it.

Point 😬

They seem to think I'm advocating the SRA. The law is the law. They are the very foundation of any society. If you choose to break the law for whatever reason, don't quival about it. Don't "I had no choice." Don't "They made me do it." Don't "It was the right thing to do." And don't "It was an unjust law."

Acknowledge your actions and don't use excuses to defend what you've done. The law doesn't tell you what is right or wrong to do. It tells you what you can or cannot do without punishment. It doesn't make excuses, it doesn't rationalise.

Originally posted by willRules
And I'm guessing this is the part where you go on to say Tony is doing the same thing and I reply with "That still doesn't make it right."

Reference my post about right and wrong being base on our beliefs.

I have to say the book that looks at both sides the best is Heroes for Hire 😬

It dosen't make the Anti-Reg look like terrorists and it dosen't make the pro-reg look like facists

Originally posted by BlaqChaos
Which part of my post did you nopt read? Where I said there were [b]millions of slave, or where I said the majority were not in direct combat? Because in almost NONE of your examples were there the majority of people fighting. [/B]

If your going to be like that about then what don't you understand in my post that the majorty doesn't always have the luxury of standing up in direct combat if they did then obviously things would be alot different than they are today it's always the miniority fighting the majority always has been always will be we've come to accept it as a race, society binds it. Rememeber that history is always written by the victors.

Originally posted by S-Ranger
If your going to be like that about then what don't you understand in my post that the majorty doesn't always have the luxury of standing up in direct combat if they did then obviously things would be alot different than they are today it's always the miniority fighting the majority always has been always will be we've come to accept it as a race, society binds it. Rememeber that history is always written by the victors.
Actually no, that not the case. Let's take WWII for instance. Those who weren't in direct combat were still doing things to support those who were.

Originally posted by BlaqChaos
Acknowledge your actions and don't use excuses to defend what you've done. The law doesn't tell you what is right or wrong to do. It tells you what you can or cannot do without punishment. It doesn't make excuses, it doesn't rationalise.

..........It doesn't make it right.

And for me and many, many other people, the fact that it isn't considered right means we are more likely to do something about it. This response can range from complaining to going Captain America and being violent ✅

Originally posted by BlaqChaos
Actually no, that not the case. Let's take WWII for instance. Those who weren't in direct combat were still doing things to support those who were.

But here's the road i've been leading you down...Who do you think was the majority and miniority in WW2

Originally posted by willRules
..........It doesn't make it right.
Once again, right and wrong are matters of personal opinion, not fact.

It's all on your perception on who is right or who is wrong.

Plus i'd say 80% of war's have had non-combatant contributions made. But at then end of the day the importnant decisions that changed the world are usually made on a battlefield only now as humanity has progressed dimplomacy is used more yet there is still conflicts everyday for people pushing what they think is right or wrong in the world.

p.s. George Bush know's alot about that.

Originally posted by S-Ranger
But here's the road i've been leading you down...Who do you think was the majority and miniority in WW2
Are you saying the majority of Jews fought back?

Originally posted by BlaqChaos
Are you saying the majority of Jews fought back?

Are you saying they shouldn't have because they were in the minority and it was the law?

Originally posted by Stupid Rookie
Are you saying they shouldn't have because they were in the minority and it was the law?

Hot dang took the word's right out of my mouth.

Originally posted by BlaqChaos
Once again, right and wrong are matters of personal opinion, not fact.

Hence me saying it's a fact that many people don't consider it right.

Originally posted by willRules
the fact that it isn't considered right

People may agree or disagree with it which is their opinion. If they choose to disagree with it, then it is a fact that they choose to disagree. ✅

which leads onto the whole people taking action statement ✅

Originally posted by Stupid Rookie
Are you saying they shouldn't have because they were in the minority and it was the law?
I'm saying they broke the law.

Originally posted by willRules
Hence me saying it's a fact that many people don't consider it right.
But in the Marvel U, most people in the US argee with the SHRA.

Originally posted by willRules
People may agree or disagree with it which is their opinion. If they choose to disagree with it, then it is a fact that they choose to disagree. ✅
It may be a fact that they choose to agree or disagree, but it's still not a fact that it's either right or wrong.

Originally posted by willRules
which leads onto the whole people taking action statement ✅
"Taking action" is a wide statement. it encompasses everything from passive to agressive resistance.

...

Or...