Originally posted by OneDumbG0How is that it's true power? It showed that it can recreate something it destroyed but that doesn't have anything to do with power levels and the fact it nullifies things.
^ So you still won't admit that the UN's true power was revealed in Abraxas? I.e., Multiverse-wide nullification AND RECREATION? kindaGuess Gems' only power was to snuff out stars one at a time per Star Gem Saga.
Originally posted by OneDumbG0That applies to the same blanket logic I could use for a strength feat for Thor, theoretically. If Thor lifts something really epic his true strength was just revealed which means I can now argue he is stronger than the Hulk despite the fact the Hulk was absent from the same situation. Giggles.
Originally posted by OneDumbG0Whoa. Now your logic is oneshotting characters proves strength superiority? I thought Thor oneshotted Abom so by your logic he should be able to easily deal with the Hulk.
^ Whenever Thor one-shots Mangog with a single punch, call me. Until then, you can't even admit that the UN's true power was revealed in Abraxas. Giggles.
Like I said absolute power. Until you can at least attempt to prove something the ig wins, resoundingly.
Originally posted by OneDumbG0Or a writer was ignorant about Thor and Mangog. Wow. Has hulk ever oneshotted classic abom?
^ If Thor one-shotted Mangog, who has perenially kicked his keester physically... then we can deduce that something in Thor has changed. Or he tapped a previously unrevealed power within. Sorry, if you couldn't follow. kindaAbsolute power except against Maelstrom. So. Not absolute. shocklaugh
Originally posted by OneDumbG0It's power remained the same. It can recreate what it destroys though it appears.
^ Like you're ignorant that the UN could never recreate that which it nullified until Abraxas? Or that such effects could be so powerful that it would be the entire Marvel Multiverse that would be destroyed/nullified? dopedNice dodge on Maelstrom btw. shocklaugh
A blast from an ig can't even defeat Eternity. I already put up the scans showing that on certain levels of power hand blasting from the ig isn't enough. Wow.
^ The same way the Gems' power remained the same when Ironman blew up the Star Gem? kinda
But if you truly believe this... then say it: "I'm quanchi112, and I believe that the UN nullifying a small marble is just as powerful a feat as nullifying AND RECREATING the entire Marvel Multiverse."
The stage is yours! Go forth and amaze the crowd! excellent
Originally posted by OneDumbG0If you want to say that they are the same thing and continue to ignore the facts because you lost this debate keep going.
^ The same way the Gems' power remained the same when Ironman blew up the Star Gem? kindaBut if you truly believe this... then say it: "[b]I'm quanchi112, and I believe that the UN nullifying a small marble is just as powerful a feat as nullifying AND RECREATING the entire Marvel Multiverse.
"The stage is yours! Go forth and amaze the crowd! excellent [/B]
Absolute power, nuff said.
Originally posted by quanchi112What's the same thing? "Ironman >>> Gems' power because he blew up Star Gem" is as unbelievably stupid as "IG >>> UN's power because Magus pwned a tiny nullification sphere"? kinda
If you want to say that they are the same thing and continue to ignore the facts because you lost this debate keep going.Absolute power, nuff said.
Speaking about the UN? Good. 👆
Originally posted by Omega VisionThe fact the ig is absolute power and was cited as being the most powerful in the 616 reality hence Eternity sought it. A writer also acted like it's not much of a comparison at all. He ignores the entire meeting where Lt ruled against the gems and with how the gems power was described because he realizes it destroys his case.
What, pray tell, are these vaunted facts he's ignoring?
Originally posted by OneDumbG0See, right on cue. You are still ignoring Eternity referring to the power as absolute when he sought it. Why doesn't Eternity seek the un's power if it's more powerful than the ig?
What's the same thing? "Ironman >>> Gems' power because he blew up Star Gem" is as unbelievably stupid as "IG >>> UN's power because Magus pwned a tiny nullification sphere"? kindaSpeaking about the UN? Good. 👆
Originally posted by quanchi112Right on cue. Changing the topic again because you realize Magus pwning tiny nullification sphere is worth as much as Ironman blowing up Star Gem. shocklaugh
See, right on cue. You are still ignoring Eternity referring to the power as absolute when he sought it. Why doesn't Eternity seek the un's power if it's more powerful than the ig?
Originally posted by OneDumbG0So all the ig has to do to defeat Eternity is handblast him? Hahahahaha, I guess all the abstracts he later imprisoned but was blasting were around the same level as Maelstrom, eh?
^ The fact that it couldn't even effect Maelstrom means it wasn't absolute power. lulzgasmYou're ignoring Ironman blowing up the Gems' power with a single repulsor blast. stoned
Originally posted by OneDumbG0Magus didn't even have the reality gem and still pwned it which hurts your case. With a thought he controls what happens to the energies even without the reality gem.
Right on cue. Changing the topic again because you realize Magus pwning tiny nullification sphere is worth as much as Ironman blowing up Star Gem. shocklaugh
Originally posted by OneDumbG0So you think a brief angry blast is the best the ig can produce hence my entire problem with your argument. You don't even know what the ig is capable of and I've put up scans where Eternity acknowledged that an angry blast wouldn't have an effect on him outside the situation and his representation at the time.
^ IG just couldn't do crap to Maelstrom. Hence, not absolute power. stonedYes. Pwned a tiny sphere of nullification. Ironman pwned the Star Gem. Ironman >> Gems' power. doped
Actual comparison and the words absolute power.