whats worse: Incest Or Rape

Started by Victor Von Doom10 pages

Yeah. We even cover the contingency plans, because all of our sex laws tend to mention anus, vagina or mouth, whereas:

70 Sexual penetration of a corpse


(1) A person commits an offence if-

(a) he intentionally performs an act of penetration with a part of his body or anything else,
(b) what is penetrated is a part of the body of a dead person,

So you can't even initiate orificial improvisation.

both you sick mutha 😘

Originally posted by lord xyz
Yep, so much for that $2000 coffin. Which, I may add, explodes due to the release of fluids from the body.

Men would shove their dick in anything, women would shove anything in their fanny.

Never heard that before, 'exploding coffins'. Doesn't make much sense though as any fluid released from the body would already be present in the corpse, so not sure how pressure would increase inside the coffin considering the amount of mass would remain the same. But it is morbidly funny if true.

I keep forgetting that to you Brits, "fanny" means vagina and not ass/anus.

Originally posted by Robtard
Never heard that before, 'exploding coffins'. Doesn't make much sense though as any fluid released from the body would already be present in the corpse, so not sure how pressure would increase inside the coffin considering the amount of mass would remain the same. But it is morbidly funny if true.

I keep forgetting that to you Brits, "fanny" means vagina and not ass/anus.

Yes it does. And you shouldn't forget. Oh how Stewie Griffin told the goat to stop eating at his fanny...

But anyway, yes, I'm sure their is exploding coffins, because of the reactions taking place within. The air in the coffin reacts with your bodily fluids making more and more and... boom.

Answer" Incest......IMO....<-- look Bardock, I said "IMO"....lol

The reason I say this is because an adult can handle a rape of most kinds, but incest cripples ones mind and views that are quite hard to over come.

Originally posted by debbiejo
Answer" Incest......IMO....<-- look Bardock, I said "IMO"....lol

The reason I say this is because an adult can handle a rape of most kinds, but incest cripples ones mind and views that are quite hard to over come.

What kind of statement is that? The incest isn't even necessarily forced, how could you possibly claim that rape is better then two consenting adults who happen to be family members having sex?

Originally posted by debbiejo
Answer" Incest......IMO....<-- look Bardock, I said "IMO"....lol

The reason I say this is because an adult can handle a rape of most kinds, but incest cripples ones mind and views that are quite hard to over come.

Yeah I mean it's not like children are raped.

Originally posted by lord xyz
Yeah I mean it's not like children are raped.
Children raped to me, yet i may be wrong, is called incest.......

Adults are raped.........Yet, I may be wrong with my view on how I see things...............

Originally posted by debbiejo
Children raped to me, yet i may be wrong, is called incest.......

Adults are raped.........Yet, I may be wrong with my view on how I see things...............

Incest is when people two or more people of the same family have sex. Incest alone does not imply "rape", though there can be incestuous rape. i.e. A father has sex with his daughter against her will.

Originally posted by debbiejo
Answer" Incest......IMO....<-- look Bardock, I said "IMO"....lol

The reason I say this is because an adult can handle a rape of most kinds, but incest cripples ones mind and views that are quite hard to over come.

Well, the difference is that when I say "imo" I am right.

Originally posted by debbiejo
yet i may be wrong

Run with it.

Originally posted by Robtard
Incest is when people two or more people of the same family have sex. Incest alone does not imply "rape", though there can be incestuous rape. i.e. A father has sex with his daughter against her will.

A father couldn't get meaningful consent from his daughter; too many authority issues.

[

Originally posted by Gregory
A father couldn't get meaningful consent from his daughter; too many authority issues.

If she's an adult and agrees to it, then it can't be considered rape, not sure what law could be used against him, maybe one or more Indecency Laws? But not rape.

There are laws against incest itself.

Originally posted by Victor Von Doom
There are laws against incest itself.

They vary from state to state and I highly doubt the punishments are as severe as being charged with rape.

-Edit: I did a little research, seems that the worse case scenario, close-blood incest sex could be punishable with up to four years in prison. Funny thing, most of these laws are for penile to vaginal contact only, so you could theoretically have oral and anal sex (gay or otherwise)with your siblings (as long as they are of the age of consent) and/or parents without fear (This is for the U.S. only). Just wrong I think.

Originally posted by Robtard
They vary from state to state and I highly doubt the punishments are as severe as being charged with rape.

It wouldn't be as severe as rape, obviously.

Also, I was referring to the UK, not your 5 dollar legal system.

Crazy Americans.

Crazy?
damn right

Originally posted by Victor Von Doom
It wouldn't be as severe as rape, obviously.

Also, I was referring to the UK, not your 5 dollar legal system.

Crazy Americans.

Why don't you post the punishments for incest under UK law and we can compare. I know inter-family marriage is outlawed in the UK, but what about incestuous sex?

Still bitter about that whole revolution thing eh?

Originally posted by Robtard
Still bitter about that whole revolution thing eh?

I actually like Britains...except the arrogant ones.