Thanos vs Superman

Originally posted by lightyeargee
I'm entitled to my opinion. What the hell is wrong with this board? You act as if people ant differently than others. Intelligent people tend to think outside the group. I find Batman, Reed Richards,and Metron to be greater thinkers than Thanos.

Salutes to you, Mr.Freethinker.

If you don't like this forum, GTFO

Originally posted by lightyeargee
??? Didn't know Tyrant Knew Thanos was coming.

Originally posted by Philosophía
Which won't be of much help once Superman gives him brain damage.

Originally posted by biensalsa
There is a difference between this two feats

Fist of all Hulk's was most likelly intended a joke by the writer. If you re-read the comic, the whole story is full sillyness. But lets not get into that.

Second Hulk did not PULVERIZE the asteroid. He just broke it

Third Superman did PULVERIZE IT as in DUST

Is harder to PULVERIZE something than just break it

Hulk's feats makes Superman's look pathetic by comparison.

Thanos 9.8/10 minimum

Superman 10/10 minimum. No one yet has defeated my argument of how the battle will go. You guys just arguing "The more powerful is always the victor."

Originally posted by h1a8
Superman 10/10 minimum. No one yet has defeated my argument of how the battle will go. You guys just arguing "The more powerful is always the victor."

Originally posted by h1a8
Superman 10/10 minimum. No one yet has defeated my argument of how the battle will go. You guys just arguing "The more powerful is always the victor."

Originally posted by h1a8
Superman 10/10 minimum. No one yet has defeated my argument of how the battle will go. You guys just arguing "The more powerful is always the victor."

And you are always arguing that a ZZZZSPEEDDDBLITZZZZZZZ wins, thats you whole argument. the strength factor here is obvious that supes is inferior in strength and duribility.

Originally posted by zeel
And you are always arguing that a ZZZZSPEEDDDBLITZZZZZZZ wins, thats you whole argument. the strength factor here is obvious that supes is inferior in strength and duribility.

If WM thor with the gem cant beat thanos then a sundipped superman cant let alone a unamped supes.

Originally posted by zeel
And you are always arguing that a ZZZZSPEEDDDBLITZZZZZZZ wins, thats you whole argument. the strength factor here is obvious that supes is inferior in strength and duribility.

Real life theory or physics doesnt mean shit in comics.

Thanos at his best with no amps etc...wins.

Originally posted by quanchi112
When did I say Tyrant was aware he was coming?

Superman has be beaten down by far less than Thanos. Thanos beats down guys on Superman's level while he fails to beat down peers. Destroying something twice the size of earth by going nowhere near as fast as Superman while Superman went faster and knocked himself out against something far smaller than the earth is a no contest.

Hulk's feats makes Superman's look pathetic by comparison.

Hardly

For one you do not even have the speed of the asteroid or the mass, just a vague "twice the size of earth" which could mean that it was a hollow asteroid, just like a big cocconut shell

And it seems you forget on purpose that PULVERIZATION takes more energy than breaking even IF this is twice the size of earth.

Originally posted by biensalsa
For one you do not even have the speed of the asteroid or the mass, just a vague "twice the size of earth" which could mean that it was a hollow asteroid, just like a big cocconut shell

Originally posted by biensalsa
And it seems you forget on purpose that PULVERIZATION takes more energy than breaking even IF this is twice the size of earth.

how is he reaching by saying pulverization takes more striking force than cracking. that is fact. i think supes feat is more impressive. doesnt prove hes stronger than hulk. but shows if he uses his speed, he can hit with more force.

^ Busting a moon or busting an asteroid twice the size of Earth. The latter is more impressive.

However you're trying to distinguish the two feats is also reaching.

Originally posted by OneDumbG0
^ Busting a moon or busting an asteroid twice the size of Earth. The latter is more impressive.

However you're trying to distinguish the two feats is also reaching.

Just sayin. 😛

Originally posted by Omega Vision
Did it say twice the mass of Earth or twice the size? Because it could have been hollow.

Just sayin. 😛

the whole size mass debate is whatever to me. im talking about the difference between cracking and pulverizing. pulverizing is with out a doubt harder.

^ And the difference between what Superman and Grey Hulk did has to do with sheer size. Not pulverizing. As soon as Superman hit the thing, it was fadin away. So acting like it's entire structure were reduced to dust particles outweighs busting something that is literally eight times the size of that shadow moon is reaching.

the pieces hulk broke from the asteroid were almost as big as the moon superman broke 😖hifty:

superman would have died trying to fill gray hulk's shoes

...... nevermind, he doesn't where shoes.

Originally posted by psycho gundam
the pieces hulk broke from the asteroid were almost as big as the moon superman broke 😖hifty:

superman would have died trying to fill gray hulk's shoes

...... nevermind, he doesn't where shoes.

Yes, specially because breaking something takes more energy than pulverizing something

Just do the experiment in your house, see how many blows it will take to break a big rock vs how many blows it will take to pulverize the same smaller rock

Have fun pulverizing rock