Originally posted by biensalsaWith a cheapshot like in the book yes I do. If it's canon I can't just ignore it.
No, I don't, I'm looking at the context. and if it does not check then you take it for what it is.A clear Example RULK vs The Watcher
Shock value of new character all over the place.
Do you think Rulk can defeat a Watcher?
Originally posted by quanchi112
With a cheapshot like in the book yes I do. If it's canon I can't just ignore it.
Then you are very innocent Quan.
You know, I know Superman cannot defeat EJ and He did just because , well is Superman, but apparently you think something similar in Marvel is part of power set and maybe you do really believe that Rulk paks the punch to ko a watcher, even though it was later retcon.
Is kind of sad, that you being 33 year old man cannot see this differences.
Originally posted by biensalsaSave your pity for someone who needs it. Rulk beat up a watcher with a cheapshot. Superman can't just beat EJ straight up in a fight. You usually do ignore context unlike myself.
Then you are very innocent Quan.You know, I know Superman cannot defeat EJ and He did just because , well is Superman, but apparently you think something similar in Marvel is part of power set and maybe you do really believe that Rulk paks the punch to ko a watcher, even though it was later retcon.
Is kind of sad, that you being 33 year old man cannot see this differences.
Originally posted by quanchi112
Pis is subjective. Who are you to define what's pis and what isn't. My debating is consistent.
If PIS is subjective then the rule will have no meaning.
Aren't watchers at least skyfather level?
Do you think Rulk can do that to Odin or Zues with a cheapshot?
Your debating is definitely consistent. You use the classic highball lowball con game almost everytime. Both that and mentioning PIS to use as evidence would consist of trolling.
Originally posted by quanchi112
Save your pity for someone who needs it. Rulk beat up a watcher with a cheapshot. Superman can't just beat EJ straight up in a fight. You usually do ignore context unlike myself.
Poor Quan, this is why you are the hero of herochat and Kmc (snickers).........
not really 🙄
Originally posted by h1a8You don't know enough to know what highball or lowballing is for either character.
If PIS is subjective then the rule will have no meaning.
Aren't watchers at least skyfather level?
Do you think Rulk can do that to Odin or Zues with a cheapshot?Your debating is definitely consistent. You use the classic highball lowball con game almost everytime. Both that and mentioning PIS to use as evidence would consist of trolling.
Pis can be used by others but it's subjective and isn't factual hence the point. I don't use pis I didn't say others couldn't but I remain steadfast in my consistencies.
I don't think Rulk could oneshot Zeus or Odin since I believe both can defeat a Watcher.
Originally posted by biensalsaThat's why no one really knows who you are save the broken english guy.
Poor Quan, this is why you are the hero of herochat and Kmc (snickers).........not really 🙄
Thanos wins.