No guns = Better world ?

use a little common sense here.

War fought with Guns -

People hide in holes and shoot at each other. People die, but also anyone has a chance of living.

War fought with swords -

People run at each other and start hacking with swords. Once someone dies, the person that was fighting that person will go look for someone else to fight.

In "modern" wars (anything since the US civil war) We would be completely agast if casualties reached even 10 percent.

In ancient warfare it wouldn't be surprising for the winning army to have casualties approaching 30%. Losing armies could be close to completely wiped out.

The difference? In the ancient method the only way for you to survive was for you to kill. In modern warfare you have the option of killing or hiding with hiding being the more effective of the 2.

Of course ancient war was more bloody. And we really wouldn't have much choice in how we fought our wars if the technology level were returned to that level.

as i said, only cops and soldiers should have guns.

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
as i said, only cops and soldiers should have guns.

And hunters

and anyone who wants to be able to protect their family.

Originally posted by docb77
And hunters

and anyone who wants to be able to protect their family.

Everyone sounds just about fair.

Originally posted by JacopeX
When I say no weaponds

Please never say weaponds again.

Originally posted by docb77
And hunters

and anyone who wants to be able to protect their family.

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
hunters? you can buy meat at the supermarket. protecting your families? if the criminals have no guns, why do we need them?

For the Illuminati and the secret world government come to take over the world 🙂

Otherwise no reason, hunters are good though we need them to stop animals from breeding to much, we don't want animals in our living area now do we?

Not because of the weapons though. But because of the different state of mind.

You think if the weapins had been available to Hitler he wouldn't have used them? Also, you think if we all had sticks nowwe would go back to that mentality?

This is true, but if the state of mind today would go from controlled damage to mass destruction it would ruin us all, so controlled damage is probably going to stay important for a very long time, besides I don't see wars where we blow up entire city's becoming more popular suddenly. And if we would go back to swords and whatnot we would go back to mass destruction techniques, seeing as controlled destruction with swords is kinda hard.

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
hunters? you can buy meat at the supermarket. protecting your families? if the criminals have no guns, why do we need them?

Apparantly no hunters live near an Albertsons.

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
hunters? you can buy meat at the supermarket. protecting your families? if the criminals have no guns, why do we need them?

Because they are still criminals, not having guns isnt't going to stop them from committing acts of violence.

Originally posted by Fishy
For the Illuminati and the secret world government come to take over the world 🙂

Otherwise no reason, hunters are good though we need them to stop animals from breeding to much, we don't want animals in our living area now do we?

This is true, but if the state of mind today would go from controlled damage to mass destruction it would ruin us all, so controlled damage is probably going to stay important for a very long time, besides I don't see wars where we blow up entire city's becoming more popular suddenly. And if we would go back to swords and whatnot we would go back to mass destruction techniques, seeing as controlled destruction with swords is kinda hard.

Guns= Equality.

No guns, small people get crushed by big people.
Guns, small people shoot big people.

Of course, I'm big for my age and good at swordfighting. Maybe I oughta shut up.

Then again, I belong to the NRA.

Small people shoot big people. Roight.

last time i checked, any person, despite their stature, can shoot someone else.

Originally posted by Bardock42
Small people shoot big people. Roight.

They have the opportunity. The Colt was reffered to as "The Great Equalizer" for good reason.

Originally posted by Darth Godzilla
Guns= Equality.

No guns, small people get crushed by big people.
Guns, small people shoot big people.

Of course, I'm big for my age and good at swordfighting. Maybe I oughta shut up.

Then again, I belong to the NRA.

Originally posted by Darth Godzilla
They have the opportunity. The Colt was reffered to as "The Great Equalizer" for good reason.

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
last time i checked, any person, despite their stature, can shoot someone else.

My God. You actually meant stature.

their physical stature. as in their size.

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
their physical stature. as in their size.

Yes.

Originally posted by Bardock42
My God. You actually meant stature.

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
then why this?

Because it signaled my disbelieve.